{"title":"保持种植体螺钉紧固:解决方案。","authors":"E A McGlumphy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrievability is the major advantage of screw-retained implant restorations compared to cement retention; however, implant screw loosening continues to be a frequently cited disadvantage of this technique. This paper describes the factors involved in maintaining a stable screw joint assembly by maximizing preload on the retaining screw while minimizing joint-separating forces. Practical clinical solutions to minimize this clinical problem are suggested. Readers are cautioned to address both the occlusal and biomechanical etiologies of screw loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":79437,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dental symposia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping implant screws tight: the solution.\",\"authors\":\"E A McGlumphy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Retrievability is the major advantage of screw-retained implant restorations compared to cement retention; however, implant screw loosening continues to be a frequently cited disadvantage of this technique. This paper describes the factors involved in maintaining a stable screw joint assembly by maximizing preload on the retaining screw while minimizing joint-separating forces. Practical clinical solutions to minimize this clinical problem are suggested. Readers are cautioned to address both the occlusal and biomechanical etiologies of screw loosening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dental symposia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dental symposia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dental symposia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrievability is the major advantage of screw-retained implant restorations compared to cement retention; however, implant screw loosening continues to be a frequently cited disadvantage of this technique. This paper describes the factors involved in maintaining a stable screw joint assembly by maximizing preload on the retaining screw while minimizing joint-separating forces. Practical clinical solutions to minimize this clinical problem are suggested. Readers are cautioned to address both the occlusal and biomechanical etiologies of screw loosening.