{"title":"雾化吡仑氮平与异丙托溴铵对气道阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管扩张剂疗效的比较。","authors":"B Ceyhan, T Celikel, S Simsir, B Kandemir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ipratropium bromide (IB) is a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, whose bronchodilator efficacy has been shown in reversible and irreversible obstructive airway diseases. Pirenzepine is a M1 receptor antagonist and effective in vagally-induced bronchoconstriction. To investigate the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine, we compared nebulized pirenzepine with nebulized IB and nebulized isotonic saline (placebo). Eighteen patients with reversible and 18 patients with irreversible obstructive airway disease were studied. Nebulized isotonic saline (placebo), 100 mcg nebulized pirenzepine and 125 mcg nebulized IB were given on three consecutive days. Spirometry was performed prior to nebulization and repeated at 5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following nebulized medication. A dose of 125 mcg IB resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 in patients with both reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.00001, p < 0.03). IB at the same dose resulted in an increase in FVC in patients with irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.001) and an increase in FEF25-75 in patients with reversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.0003). Pirenzepine therapy resulted in no significant change in the same parameters. It is concluded that nebulized pirenzepine at a dose of 100 mcg does not have bronchodilator effect in patients with reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 10","pages":"510-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine and ipratropium bromide in patients with airway obstructive lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"B Ceyhan, T Celikel, S Simsir, B Kandemir\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ipratropium bromide (IB) is a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, whose bronchodilator efficacy has been shown in reversible and irreversible obstructive airway diseases. Pirenzepine is a M1 receptor antagonist and effective in vagally-induced bronchoconstriction. To investigate the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine, we compared nebulized pirenzepine with nebulized IB and nebulized isotonic saline (placebo). Eighteen patients with reversible and 18 patients with irreversible obstructive airway disease were studied. Nebulized isotonic saline (placebo), 100 mcg nebulized pirenzepine and 125 mcg nebulized IB were given on three consecutive days. Spirometry was performed prior to nebulization and repeated at 5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following nebulized medication. A dose of 125 mcg IB resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 in patients with both reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.00001, p < 0.03). IB at the same dose resulted in an increase in FVC in patients with irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.001) and an increase in FEF25-75 in patients with reversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.0003). Pirenzepine therapy resulted in no significant change in the same parameters. It is concluded that nebulized pirenzepine at a dose of 100 mcg does not have bronchodilator effect in patients with reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"510-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
异丙托溴铵(IB)是一种非选择性毒蕈碱拮抗剂,其支气管扩张剂作用已在可逆性和不可逆性阻塞性气道疾病中得到证实。吡伦齐平是一种M1受体拮抗剂,对迷走神经诱导的支气管收缩有效。为了研究雾化哌伦齐平的支气管扩张效果,我们将雾化哌伦齐平与雾化IB和雾化等渗盐水(安慰剂)进行了比较。研究了18例可逆性和18例不可逆性阻塞性气道疾病。连续3天给予等渗生理盐水雾化(安慰剂)、100 mcg吡仑西平雾化和125 mcg IB雾化。雾化前进行肺活量测定,雾化用药后5、30、60、90和120分钟重复肺量测定。125 mcg IB剂量导致可逆或不可逆支气管收缩患者FEV1显著增加(p < 0.00001, p < 0.03)。相同剂量的IB导致不可逆支气管收缩患者FVC升高(p < 0.001),可逆支气管收缩患者FEF25-75升高(p < 0.0003)。吡仑氮平治疗没有导致相同参数的显著变化。结论:100 mcg剂量的雾化吡仑西平对可逆性或不可逆性支气管收缩患者没有支气管扩张作用。
Comparison of the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine and ipratropium bromide in patients with airway obstructive lung disease.
Ipratropium bromide (IB) is a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, whose bronchodilator efficacy has been shown in reversible and irreversible obstructive airway diseases. Pirenzepine is a M1 receptor antagonist and effective in vagally-induced bronchoconstriction. To investigate the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine, we compared nebulized pirenzepine with nebulized IB and nebulized isotonic saline (placebo). Eighteen patients with reversible and 18 patients with irreversible obstructive airway disease were studied. Nebulized isotonic saline (placebo), 100 mcg nebulized pirenzepine and 125 mcg nebulized IB were given on three consecutive days. Spirometry was performed prior to nebulization and repeated at 5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following nebulized medication. A dose of 125 mcg IB resulted in a significant increase in FEV1 in patients with both reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.00001, p < 0.03). IB at the same dose resulted in an increase in FVC in patients with irreversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.001) and an increase in FEF25-75 in patients with reversible bronchoconstriction (p < 0.0003). Pirenzepine therapy resulted in no significant change in the same parameters. It is concluded that nebulized pirenzepine at a dose of 100 mcg does not have bronchodilator effect in patients with reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction.