用LAL法和热原法测定干热对典型内毒素的破坏。

T Nakata
{"title":"用LAL法和热原法测定干热对典型内毒素的破坏。","authors":"T Nakata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The kinetics of destruction by dry heat of two typical endotoxins, Escherichia coli 055:B5 (E. coli endotoxin) and Salmonella abortus equi (S. abortus equi endotoxin), were determined using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) and pyrogen assays. The efficiency of recovery of these endotoxins from carriers using a pyrogen assay was also determined simultaneously. In the LAL assay 0.1-10,000 EU was used and 10-1000 EU in the pyrogen assay. Recoveries of E. coli endotoxin and S. abortus equi endotoxin were, respectively, 49.7-92.0% and 27.0-70.1% by the LAL assay, and 31.1% and 60.6% by the pyrogen assay. Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) spectra demonstrated the presence of chemical structural differences between the two endotoxins. By dry heat (200 or 250 degrees C), there were no significant differences in the destruction kinetics between the two endotoxins; either endotoxin can therefore be adapted for use in the endotoxin challenge test. Destruction in the pyrogen assay was significantly quicker than that predicted by the LAL assay for each of the two endotoxins. In this endotoxin destruction system, 3 log cycle reduction (the United State Pharmacopeia (USP) recommendation for the depyrogenation process) could not be obtained by challenge with 10,000 EU of endotoxin under the depyrogenation conditions of 200 degrees C for 60 min (a set of conditions described in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP)), though little pyrogenicity remained. On the other hand, at 250 degrees C for 30 min (a set of conditions described in the EP, USP and Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP)),a 3 log cycle reduction was achieved without any pyrogenicity remaining.</p>","PeriodicalId":16667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association","volume":"47 5","pages":"258-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Destruction of typical endotoxins by dry heat as determined using LAL assay and pyrogen assay.\",\"authors\":\"T Nakata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The kinetics of destruction by dry heat of two typical endotoxins, Escherichia coli 055:B5 (E. coli endotoxin) and Salmonella abortus equi (S. abortus equi endotoxin), were determined using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) and pyrogen assays. The efficiency of recovery of these endotoxins from carriers using a pyrogen assay was also determined simultaneously. In the LAL assay 0.1-10,000 EU was used and 10-1000 EU in the pyrogen assay. Recoveries of E. coli endotoxin and S. abortus equi endotoxin were, respectively, 49.7-92.0% and 27.0-70.1% by the LAL assay, and 31.1% and 60.6% by the pyrogen assay. Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) spectra demonstrated the presence of chemical structural differences between the two endotoxins. By dry heat (200 or 250 degrees C), there were no significant differences in the destruction kinetics between the two endotoxins; either endotoxin can therefore be adapted for use in the endotoxin challenge test. Destruction in the pyrogen assay was significantly quicker than that predicted by the LAL assay for each of the two endotoxins. In this endotoxin destruction system, 3 log cycle reduction (the United State Pharmacopeia (USP) recommendation for the depyrogenation process) could not be obtained by challenge with 10,000 EU of endotoxin under the depyrogenation conditions of 200 degrees C for 60 min (a set of conditions described in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP)), though little pyrogenicity remained. On the other hand, at 250 degrees C for 30 min (a set of conditions described in the EP, USP and Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP)),a 3 log cycle reduction was achieved without any pyrogenicity remaining.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"258-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用鲎试剂(LAL)和热原法测定了大肠杆菌055:B5 (E. coli内毒素)和马产沙门氏菌(S. abortus equi内毒素)两种典型内毒素在干热作用下的破坏动力学。利用热原测定法同时测定了从载体中回收这些内毒素的效率。LAL法使用0.1- 10000 EU,热原法使用10-1000 EU。LAL法测定大肠杆菌和产马链球菌内毒素的回收率分别为49.7 ~ 92.0%和27.0 ~ 70.1%,热原法测定大肠杆菌和产马链球菌内毒素的回收率分别为31.1%和60.6%。傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)表明两种内毒素在化学结构上存在差异。在干热(200或250℃)下,两种内毒素的破坏动力学没有显著差异;因此,任何一种内毒素都可以用于内毒素激发试验。热原法的破坏速度明显快于LAL法对两种内毒素的预测。在该内毒素破坏系统中,在200摄氏度60分钟(欧洲药典(EP)中描述的一组条件)的去热原条件下,用10,000 EU的内毒素进行挑战,无法获得3 log循环还原(美国药典(USP)推荐的去热原过程),尽管几乎没有留下热原性。另一方面,在250摄氏度下30分钟(EP, USP和日本药典(JP)中描述的一组条件),实现了3 log循环的减少,没有任何热原性残留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Destruction of typical endotoxins by dry heat as determined using LAL assay and pyrogen assay.

The kinetics of destruction by dry heat of two typical endotoxins, Escherichia coli 055:B5 (E. coli endotoxin) and Salmonella abortus equi (S. abortus equi endotoxin), were determined using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) and pyrogen assays. The efficiency of recovery of these endotoxins from carriers using a pyrogen assay was also determined simultaneously. In the LAL assay 0.1-10,000 EU was used and 10-1000 EU in the pyrogen assay. Recoveries of E. coli endotoxin and S. abortus equi endotoxin were, respectively, 49.7-92.0% and 27.0-70.1% by the LAL assay, and 31.1% and 60.6% by the pyrogen assay. Fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) spectra demonstrated the presence of chemical structural differences between the two endotoxins. By dry heat (200 or 250 degrees C), there were no significant differences in the destruction kinetics between the two endotoxins; either endotoxin can therefore be adapted for use in the endotoxin challenge test. Destruction in the pyrogen assay was significantly quicker than that predicted by the LAL assay for each of the two endotoxins. In this endotoxin destruction system, 3 log cycle reduction (the United State Pharmacopeia (USP) recommendation for the depyrogenation process) could not be obtained by challenge with 10,000 EU of endotoxin under the depyrogenation conditions of 200 degrees C for 60 min (a set of conditions described in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP)), though little pyrogenicity remained. On the other hand, at 250 degrees C for 30 min (a set of conditions described in the EP, USP and Pharmacopoeia of Japan (JP)),a 3 log cycle reduction was achieved without any pyrogenicity remaining.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating out-of-specification laboratory results. Simplifying and improving process validation. Depyrogenation of pharmaceutical solutions using submicron and ultrafilters. USP perspectives on particle contamination of injectable products. Moisture measurement: a new method for monitoring freeze-drying cycles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1