{"title":"评估坏账在新罕布什尔州和佛蒙特州的办公室为基础的做法。","authors":"S J Weiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bad debt is one measure of the cost of medical indigence on health care institutions. This two-part study identifies a methodology for and presents findings from measuring bad debt in a collection of office-based practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Part I of the study, data were gathered on site from 26 practices in Sullivan County, New Hampshire, after first conducting a survey of bad debt losses at these offices. Survey findings were compared to on-site findings and it was determined that only the practices with computerized record-keeping systems were able to supply accurate data by survey alone. In Part II, 71 randomly chosen computerized practices in New Hampshire and Vermont (identified in a screen of 275 practices) were surveyed on bad debt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The practices from Part II wrote off an average of $23,115 per physician in 1990 from bad debt in a region in which primary care physician income averages approximately $70,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The author calculates that bad debt losses are greater than either Medicare or Medicaid losses. Uninsured patients account for 21.6% of office visits but 45% of practice write-offs. Bad debt accounts for a 16% loss from total earnings from regular office visits. Office-based practices in this study are shouldering a significant portion of the cost of care of their uninsured and underinsured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"13 4","pages":"331-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing bad debt in New Hampshire and Vermont office-based practices.\",\"authors\":\"S J Weiner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bad debt is one measure of the cost of medical indigence on health care institutions. This two-part study identifies a methodology for and presents findings from measuring bad debt in a collection of office-based practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Part I of the study, data were gathered on site from 26 practices in Sullivan County, New Hampshire, after first conducting a survey of bad debt losses at these offices. Survey findings were compared to on-site findings and it was determined that only the practices with computerized record-keeping systems were able to supply accurate data by survey alone. In Part II, 71 randomly chosen computerized practices in New Hampshire and Vermont (identified in a screen of 275 practices) were surveyed on bad debt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The practices from Part II wrote off an average of $23,115 per physician in 1990 from bad debt in a region in which primary care physician income averages approximately $70,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The author calculates that bad debt losses are greater than either Medicare or Medicaid losses. Uninsured patients account for 21.6% of office visits but 45% of practice write-offs. Bad debt accounts for a 16% loss from total earnings from regular office visits. Office-based practices in this study are shouldering a significant portion of the cost of care of their uninsured and underinsured patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice research journal\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"331-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing bad debt in New Hampshire and Vermont office-based practices.
Objective: Bad debt is one measure of the cost of medical indigence on health care institutions. This two-part study identifies a methodology for and presents findings from measuring bad debt in a collection of office-based practices.
Methods: In Part I of the study, data were gathered on site from 26 practices in Sullivan County, New Hampshire, after first conducting a survey of bad debt losses at these offices. Survey findings were compared to on-site findings and it was determined that only the practices with computerized record-keeping systems were able to supply accurate data by survey alone. In Part II, 71 randomly chosen computerized practices in New Hampshire and Vermont (identified in a screen of 275 practices) were surveyed on bad debt.
Results: The practices from Part II wrote off an average of $23,115 per physician in 1990 from bad debt in a region in which primary care physician income averages approximately $70,000.
Conclusions: The author calculates that bad debt losses are greater than either Medicare or Medicaid losses. Uninsured patients account for 21.6% of office visits but 45% of practice write-offs. Bad debt accounts for a 16% loss from total earnings from regular office visits. Office-based practices in this study are shouldering a significant portion of the cost of care of their uninsured and underinsured patients.