[在义务论和伦理学之间,制度变得值得尊敬吗?]

Acta psychiatrica Belgica Pub Date : 1995-01-01
M Breulet
{"title":"[在义务论和伦理学之间,制度变得值得尊敬吗?]","authors":"M Breulet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deontology draws one's inspiration from Ethics. From this occurrence it seems important to avoid confusion between the first and the second. Psychiatry belongs truly to medical training. Nevertheless considering freedom pathology is its main particularity. This is the reason why human freedom must, at all cost, be preserved. This one is essential whenever individual subjectivity is concerned. The fundamental reference remains Human Rights Convention; even if opposed to principle of reality, one is necessarily obliged to a conflictual accommodation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75415,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","volume":"95 6","pages":"337-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Between deontology and ethics, does the institution become respectable?].\",\"authors\":\"M Breulet\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deontology draws one's inspiration from Ethics. From this occurrence it seems important to avoid confusion between the first and the second. Psychiatry belongs truly to medical training. Nevertheless considering freedom pathology is its main particularity. This is the reason why human freedom must, at all cost, be preserved. This one is essential whenever individual subjectivity is concerned. The fundamental reference remains Human Rights Convention; even if opposed to principle of reality, one is necessarily obliged to a conflictual accommodation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"95 6\",\"pages\":\"337-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta psychiatrica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道义论从伦理学中汲取灵感。从这种情况来看,避免混淆第一种和第二种似乎很重要。精神病学真正属于医学训练。然而,考虑自由的病理学是其主要的特殊性。这就是为什么必须不惜一切代价维护人类自由的原因。这一点在涉及个人主观性时是必不可少的。基本参考仍然是《人权公约》;即使与现实的原则相抵触,人们也必然被迫作出冲突的妥协。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Between deontology and ethics, does the institution become respectable?].

Deontology draws one's inspiration from Ethics. From this occurrence it seems important to avoid confusion between the first and the second. Psychiatry belongs truly to medical training. Nevertheless considering freedom pathology is its main particularity. This is the reason why human freedom must, at all cost, be preserved. This one is essential whenever individual subjectivity is concerned. The fundamental reference remains Human Rights Convention; even if opposed to principle of reality, one is necessarily obliged to a conflictual accommodation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems of process-efficiency studies in psychotherapy. [Problem of indications in psychotherapy]. Costs and benefits of psychotherapy. [Psychotherapy in the institutional environment]. [Psychotherapy in children and youths].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1