从啮齿动物和非人类灵长类动物到人类的杂环胺致癌数据的外推。

R H Adamson, U P Thorgeirsson, T Sugimura
{"title":"从啮齿动物和非人类灵长类动物到人类的杂环胺致癌数据的外推。","authors":"R H Adamson,&nbsp;U P Thorgeirsson,&nbsp;T Sugimura","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-61105-6_29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty different heterocyclic amines have been isolated and identified from cooked foods especially beef, fish, pork and fowl. Other HCAs have also been isolated but their structure remains to be elucidated and new HCAs are likely to be identified in the future. The HCAs are highly mutagenic and all ten HCAs that have been tested for carcinogenic activity, produce tumors in mice and rats. For humans the average daily intake of HCAs is in quantities of 10-20 mg/person/day. The HCAs are procarcinogens and are activated by the cytochrome P450 system especially CYP 1A2. Rodents, monkeys and humans have the capacity to activate HCAs. Studies using hepatic microsomes demonstrated that humans have a greater capacity to activate the majority of HCAs tested than rodents or cynomolgus monkeys. Three HCAs are currently under evaluation in nonhuman primates for carcinogenic activity and one, IQ, is highly carcinogenic inducing primary hepatocellular carcinomas in the majority of cynomolgus monkeys treated. Epidemiological studies, although not definitive, are supportive of an association of HCAs intake to the etiology of human cancer. Risk assessments from animal data show a risk of HCAs to humans in the range of 10(-3) to 10(-4) which is an order of magnitude greater than compounds currently regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the Environmental Protection Agency. Taken together evidence from mutagenicity data, activation by various species including humans, carcinogenicity in animals, human consumption data, epidemiological studies and risk assessment, supports the conclusion that HCAs are probable human carcinogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":8353,"journal":{"name":"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement","volume":"18 ","pages":"303-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extrapolation of heterocyclic amine carcinogenesis data from rodents and nonhuman primates to humans.\",\"authors\":\"R H Adamson,&nbsp;U P Thorgeirsson,&nbsp;T Sugimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-642-61105-6_29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty different heterocyclic amines have been isolated and identified from cooked foods especially beef, fish, pork and fowl. Other HCAs have also been isolated but their structure remains to be elucidated and new HCAs are likely to be identified in the future. The HCAs are highly mutagenic and all ten HCAs that have been tested for carcinogenic activity, produce tumors in mice and rats. For humans the average daily intake of HCAs is in quantities of 10-20 mg/person/day. The HCAs are procarcinogens and are activated by the cytochrome P450 system especially CYP 1A2. Rodents, monkeys and humans have the capacity to activate HCAs. Studies using hepatic microsomes demonstrated that humans have a greater capacity to activate the majority of HCAs tested than rodents or cynomolgus monkeys. Three HCAs are currently under evaluation in nonhuman primates for carcinogenic activity and one, IQ, is highly carcinogenic inducing primary hepatocellular carcinomas in the majority of cynomolgus monkeys treated. Epidemiological studies, although not definitive, are supportive of an association of HCAs intake to the etiology of human cancer. Risk assessments from animal data show a risk of HCAs to humans in the range of 10(-3) to 10(-4) which is an order of magnitude greater than compounds currently regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the Environmental Protection Agency. Taken together evidence from mutagenicity data, activation by various species including humans, carcinogenicity in animals, human consumption data, epidemiological studies and risk assessment, supports the conclusion that HCAs are probable human carcinogens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"303-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61105-6_29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61105-6_29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

20种不同的杂环胺已从熟食中分离和鉴定出来,特别是牛肉、鱼、猪肉和家禽。其他HCAs也被分离出来,但它们的结构仍有待阐明,未来可能会发现新的HCAs。这些HCAs具有高度的诱变性,所有10种经致癌活性测试的HCAs都能在小鼠和大鼠体内产生肿瘤。对于人类来说,HCAs的平均每日摄入量为10-20毫克/人/天。HCAs是一种前致癌物,可被细胞色素P450系统,特别是cyp1a2激活。啮齿类动物、猴子和人类都有激活HCAs的能力。利用肝微粒体进行的研究表明,与啮齿类动物或食蟹猴相比,人类激活大多数HCAs的能力更强。目前正在评估三种HCAs在非人灵长类动物中的致癌活性,其中一种,IQ,在大多数接受治疗的食蟹猴中是高度致癌的,可诱发原发性肝细胞癌。流行病学研究虽然不确定,但支持HCAs摄入量与人类癌症病因的关联。来自动物数据的风险评估显示,HCAs对人类的风险在10(-3)到10(-4)之间,这比美国食品和药物管理局或环境保护局目前监管的化合物高出一个数量级。从致突变性数据、包括人类在内的各种物种的激活、动物致癌性、人类消费数据、流行病学研究和风险评估等方面综合得出的证据支持了HCAs可能是人类致癌物的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extrapolation of heterocyclic amine carcinogenesis data from rodents and nonhuman primates to humans.

Twenty different heterocyclic amines have been isolated and identified from cooked foods especially beef, fish, pork and fowl. Other HCAs have also been isolated but their structure remains to be elucidated and new HCAs are likely to be identified in the future. The HCAs are highly mutagenic and all ten HCAs that have been tested for carcinogenic activity, produce tumors in mice and rats. For humans the average daily intake of HCAs is in quantities of 10-20 mg/person/day. The HCAs are procarcinogens and are activated by the cytochrome P450 system especially CYP 1A2. Rodents, monkeys and humans have the capacity to activate HCAs. Studies using hepatic microsomes demonstrated that humans have a greater capacity to activate the majority of HCAs tested than rodents or cynomolgus monkeys. Three HCAs are currently under evaluation in nonhuman primates for carcinogenic activity and one, IQ, is highly carcinogenic inducing primary hepatocellular carcinomas in the majority of cynomolgus monkeys treated. Epidemiological studies, although not definitive, are supportive of an association of HCAs intake to the etiology of human cancer. Risk assessments from animal data show a risk of HCAs to humans in the range of 10(-3) to 10(-4) which is an order of magnitude greater than compounds currently regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the Environmental Protection Agency. Taken together evidence from mutagenicity data, activation by various species including humans, carcinogenicity in animals, human consumption data, epidemiological studies and risk assessment, supports the conclusion that HCAs are probable human carcinogens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection of low levels of DNA damage arising from exposure of humans to chemical carcinogens. Natural antioxidants in chemoprevention. Development of in vitro models for cellular and molecular studies in toxicology and chemoprevention. Bioavailability and health effects of dietary flavonols in man. Epidemiological studies on antioxidants, lipid peroxidation and atherosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1