S R Berger, P B Kurnik, H L Waxman, W C Groh, W J Untereker, W H Matthai
{"title":"使用新的球囊阻塞导管进行乳腺内动脉造影,无选择性插管。","authors":"S R Berger, P B Kurnik, H L Waxman, W C Groh, W J Untereker, W H Matthai","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":"39 2","pages":"198-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter.\",\"authors\":\"S R Berger, P B Kurnik, H L Waxman, W C Groh, W J Untereker, W H Matthai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"198-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter.
Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.