全科医生如何管理有中风风险的病人?

G E Mead, H Murray, C N McCollum, P A O'Neill
{"title":"全科医生如何管理有中风风险的病人?","authors":"G E Mead,&nbsp;H Murray,&nbsp;C N McCollum,&nbsp;P A O'Neill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed by means of a postal questionnaire how general practitioners (GPs) manage patients at risk from stroke. Of the 640 GPs sent a questionnaire, 294 (46%) replied. In patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, 24% of responding GPs would not arrange any investigations. Sixty-one per cent refer under half of their patients for further investigation, although 99% of GPs would commence aspirin. Seventy-seven per cent of GPs were aware of the benefits of carotid surgery. For patients in atrial fibrillation, most GPs (77%) thought that warfarin reduced stroke rates, but only 20% would consider commencing warfarin, although 26% would commence aspirin. In hypertensive patients, the GPs' threshold for treatment ranged from 135 to 200mmHg systolic (median 160mmHg), and from 90 to 110mmHg diastolic (median 100mmHg). Most GPs (84%) would treat isolated systolic hypertension with a median threshold of 180mmHg (range 140-240mmHg). The results of this study suggest that some patients at risk from stroke may not receive optimal investigation and treatment in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"50 8","pages":"426-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do general practitioners manage patients at risk from stroke?\",\"authors\":\"G E Mead,&nbsp;H Murray,&nbsp;C N McCollum,&nbsp;P A O'Neill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed by means of a postal questionnaire how general practitioners (GPs) manage patients at risk from stroke. Of the 640 GPs sent a questionnaire, 294 (46%) replied. In patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, 24% of responding GPs would not arrange any investigations. Sixty-one per cent refer under half of their patients for further investigation, although 99% of GPs would commence aspirin. Seventy-seven per cent of GPs were aware of the benefits of carotid surgery. For patients in atrial fibrillation, most GPs (77%) thought that warfarin reduced stroke rates, but only 20% would consider commencing warfarin, although 26% would commence aspirin. In hypertensive patients, the GPs' threshold for treatment ranged from 135 to 200mmHg systolic (median 160mmHg), and from 90 to 110mmHg diastolic (median 100mmHg). Most GPs (84%) would treat isolated systolic hypertension with a median threshold of 180mmHg (range 140-240mmHg). The results of this study suggest that some patients at risk from stroke may not receive optimal investigation and treatment in the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"426-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过邮寄问卷的方式评估全科医生(全科医生)如何管理有中风风险的病人。在640名全科医生中,有294名(46%)回复了问卷。在近期发生过短暂性缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中的患者中,24%的受访全科医生不安排任何检查。尽管99%的全科医生会开始服用阿司匹林,但61%的人会将不到一半的病人转介给进一步的调查。77%的全科医生知道颈动脉手术的好处。对于房颤患者,大多数全科医生(77%)认为华法林可以降低卒中发生率,但只有20%的人会考虑开始使用华法林,而26%的人会开始使用阿司匹林。在高血压患者中,全科医生的治疗阈值范围为135 - 200mmHg收缩压(中位数160mmHg)和90 - 110mmHg舒张压(中位数100mmHg)。大多数全科医生(84%)会治疗孤立性收缩期高血压,中位阈值为180mmHg(范围140-240mmHg)。这项研究的结果表明,一些有中风风险的患者可能没有在社区得到最佳的调查和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do general practitioners manage patients at risk from stroke?

This study assessed by means of a postal questionnaire how general practitioners (GPs) manage patients at risk from stroke. Of the 640 GPs sent a questionnaire, 294 (46%) replied. In patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, 24% of responding GPs would not arrange any investigations. Sixty-one per cent refer under half of their patients for further investigation, although 99% of GPs would commence aspirin. Seventy-seven per cent of GPs were aware of the benefits of carotid surgery. For patients in atrial fibrillation, most GPs (77%) thought that warfarin reduced stroke rates, but only 20% would consider commencing warfarin, although 26% would commence aspirin. In hypertensive patients, the GPs' threshold for treatment ranged from 135 to 200mmHg systolic (median 160mmHg), and from 90 to 110mmHg diastolic (median 100mmHg). Most GPs (84%) would treat isolated systolic hypertension with a median threshold of 180mmHg (range 140-240mmHg). The results of this study suggest that some patients at risk from stroke may not receive optimal investigation and treatment in the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CANCER PREVENTION. COLIC. Diabetes mellitus. Renal artery stenosis. Tirofiban--spinning the data from fact to hype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1