[从医学角度来看，专家意见相互矛盾]。

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung Pub Date : 1996-11-01

G Specht

{"title":"[从医学角度来看，专家意见相互矛盾]。","authors":"G Specht","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The difference of expert assessments is mainly due to individual views but may be caused by other factors from the medical part. Some assessments sound different for the non-medical listener without really being different-at least from the approach. Additionally, the language of expert witnesses are quite different, plausible phrasing goes down well. The kind of the expert assessment or diversity of clients does not influence essentially the frequency of conflicts.","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"640-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint].\",\"authors\":\"G Specht\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The difference of expert assessments is mainly due to individual views but may be caused by other factors from the medical part. Some assessments sound different for the non-medical listener without really being different-at least from the approach. Additionally, the language of expert witnesses are quite different, plausible phrasing goes down well. The kind of the expert assessment or diversity of clients does not influence essentially the frequency of conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"volume\":\"90 7\",\"pages\":\"640-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

专家评价的差异主要是由于个人的观点，但也可能是由医学方面的其他因素造成的。有些评估对非医学听众来说听起来不同，但实际上并没有什么不同——至少从方法上看是不同的。此外，专家证人的语言差异很大，可信的措辞很容易被接受。专家评估的类型或客户的多样性基本上不会影响冲突的频率。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

[Conflicting expert opinions from the medical viewpoint].

The difference of expert assessments is mainly due to individual views but may be caused by other factors from the medical part. Some assessments sound different for the non-medical listener without really being different-at least from the approach. Additionally, the language of expert witnesses are quite different, plausible phrasing goes down well. The kind of the expert assessment or diversity of clients does not influence essentially the frequency of conflicts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

[Transfusion-hemosiderosis]. [Retroperitoneal fibrosis]. [Abdominal pain]. [Healthy life style. Perspectives of prevention in modern society]. [General practice quality circles in the large city. Participation by Hamburg general physicians].