{"title":"[从法律责任的角度看民事和刑事医学专家鉴定]。","authors":"H J Kümper","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In view of the wide range of liability claims, expert medical reports constitute part of the basis of the work of liability insurers. However, the very different qualifications of experts often present the so-called \"corporate physician\" with great problems, since some expert reports are hardly acceptable, as the author discovered during many years of study of a large number of liability files. In addition, the most striking and frequently occurring criteria are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23879,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","volume":"90 7","pages":"589-90; discussion 591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint].\",\"authors\":\"H J Kümper\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In view of the wide range of liability claims, expert medical reports constitute part of the basis of the work of liability insurers. However, the very different qualifications of experts often present the so-called \\\"corporate physician\\\" with great problems, since some expert reports are hardly acceptable, as the author discovered during many years of study of a large number of liability files. In addition, the most striking and frequently occurring criteria are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"volume\":\"90 7\",\"pages\":\"589-90; discussion 591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law from the legal liability viewpoint].
In view of the wide range of liability claims, expert medical reports constitute part of the basis of the work of liability insurers. However, the very different qualifications of experts often present the so-called "corporate physician" with great problems, since some expert reports are hardly acceptable, as the author discovered during many years of study of a large number of liability files. In addition, the most striking and frequently occurring criteria are discussed.