{"title":"市售巨细胞病毒pp65抗原血症测定抗体试剂的比较","authors":"Kirsten St.George, Charles R. Rinaldo Jr.","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The Argene Biosoft 1C3 and the Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies are two of the most commonly used commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia assay.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> The sensitivities of these two reagents were compared in peripheral blood specimens received for CMV antigenemia testing.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> A total of 1149 peripheral blood specimens were processed for CMV antigenemia testing. Duplicate slides were stained with the Biosoft 1C3 and Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 158 specimens gave a positive result by one or both antibodies. One hundred and forty five were positive by the Biosoft antibody and 130 were positive by the Biotest antibody. Positive cell counts were significantly higher on cell preparations stained by the Biosoft antibody (Wilcoxon signed rank, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and the Biosoft antibody detected twice as many low-level positive specimens as the Biotest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Biosoft antibody reagent was superior to the Biotest reagent for the detection of CMV antigenemia. This is an important factor since early detection is essential for appropriate initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy, particularly in transplant recipients at high risk of CMV disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 147-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten St.George, Charles R. Rinaldo Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The Argene Biosoft 1C3 and the Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies are two of the most commonly used commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia assay.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> The sensitivities of these two reagents were compared in peripheral blood specimens received for CMV antigenemia testing.</p><p><strong>Study design:</strong> A total of 1149 peripheral blood specimens were processed for CMV antigenemia testing. Duplicate slides were stained with the Biosoft 1C3 and Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 158 specimens gave a positive result by one or both antibodies. One hundred and forty five were positive by the Biosoft antibody and 130 were positive by the Biotest antibody. Positive cell counts were significantly higher on cell preparations stained by the Biosoft antibody (Wilcoxon signed rank, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and the Biosoft antibody detected twice as many low-level positive specimens as the Biotest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Biosoft antibody reagent was superior to the Biotest reagent for the detection of CMV antigenemia. This is an important factor since early detection is essential for appropriate initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy, particularly in transplant recipients at high risk of CMV disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic virology\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 147-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(96)00264-4\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019796002644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019796002644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
摘要
背景:Argene Biosoft 1C3和Biotest C10、C11单克隆抗体是巨细胞病毒(CMV) pp65抗原血症检测中最常用的两种市售抗体试剂。目的:比较两种试剂对CMV抗原血症检测外周血标本的敏感性。研究设计:对1149例外周血标本进行巨细胞病毒抗原血症检测。用Biosoft 1C3和Biotest C10、C11单克隆抗体对重复的载玻片进行染色。结果:158例标本单抗体或双抗体阳性。145例Biosoft抗体阳性,130例Biotest抗体阳性。经Biosoft抗体染色的细胞制剂阳性细胞数显著增加(Wilcoxon signed rank, P <0.001), Biosoft抗体检测到的低水平阳性标本是Biotest的两倍。结论:Biosoft抗体试剂检测巨细胞病毒抗原血症优于Biotest试剂。这是一个重要的因素,因为早期发现对于适当开始先发制人的抗病毒治疗至关重要,特别是在巨细胞病毒疾病高风险的移植受者中。
Comparison of commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay
Background: The Argene Biosoft 1C3 and the Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies are two of the most commonly used commercially available antibody reagents for the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia assay.
Objectives: The sensitivities of these two reagents were compared in peripheral blood specimens received for CMV antigenemia testing.
Study design: A total of 1149 peripheral blood specimens were processed for CMV antigenemia testing. Duplicate slides were stained with the Biosoft 1C3 and Biotest C10,C11 monoclonal antibodies.
Results: A total of 158 specimens gave a positive result by one or both antibodies. One hundred and forty five were positive by the Biosoft antibody and 130 were positive by the Biotest antibody. Positive cell counts were significantly higher on cell preparations stained by the Biosoft antibody (Wilcoxon signed rank, P < 0.001) and the Biosoft antibody detected twice as many low-level positive specimens as the Biotest.
Conclusions: The Biosoft antibody reagent was superior to the Biotest reagent for the detection of CMV antigenemia. This is an important factor since early detection is essential for appropriate initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy, particularly in transplant recipients at high risk of CMV disease.