{"title":"开发关键路径的三种替代方法的成本和效益。","authors":"M Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.</p>","PeriodicalId":79476,"journal":{"name":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","volume":"1 3","pages":"126-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three alternative methods of developing critical pathways cost and benefits.\",\"authors\":\"M Williams\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"126-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three alternative methods of developing critical pathways cost and benefits.
Three common methods of determining optimum pathways and their attendant cost and time requirements will be evaluated. Popular methods used for the development and adaptation of pathways are the use of published guidelines, the creation of pathways within an existing health care system and the use of an automated tool. The cost and time required for each of these methods vary tremendously.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
