{"title":"基准流程图。","authors":"M W Corbett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benchmarking is the process used to search for best-in-class, compare results, discover the enablers of superior process performance, and take action to achieve quantum process improvement. It sounds simple, but all too often benchmarking efforts fail. The first obstacle often is failing to understand how work is currently being performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through linear flow charts, connection charts, and cross-functional flow charts, teams identify each step in a process, see how the people in the process interact, follow the work flow, and label the type of a step. When this is accompanied by supporting documentation, this method provides teams a way to visually see the work flow and know where there are glitches and where things are going well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through flow charting, benchmarking teams can understand what they are doing so they know what to look for in a benchmarking partner and how to identify the enablers of a superior performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Without flow charting, teams will not get the maximum benefit from benchmarking.</p>","PeriodicalId":79476,"journal":{"name":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","volume":"1 3","pages":"161-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow chart to benchmark.\",\"authors\":\"M W Corbett\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benchmarking is the process used to search for best-in-class, compare results, discover the enablers of superior process performance, and take action to achieve quantum process improvement. It sounds simple, but all too often benchmarking efforts fail. The first obstacle often is failing to understand how work is currently being performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through linear flow charts, connection charts, and cross-functional flow charts, teams identify each step in a process, see how the people in the process interact, follow the work flow, and label the type of a step. When this is accompanied by supporting documentation, this method provides teams a way to visually see the work flow and know where there are glitches and where things are going well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through flow charting, benchmarking teams can understand what they are doing so they know what to look for in a benchmarking partner and how to identify the enablers of a superior performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Without flow charting, teams will not get the maximum benefit from benchmarking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"161-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基准测试是用于搜索同类最佳,比较结果,发现卓越工艺性能的推动因素,并采取行动实现量子工艺改进的过程。这听起来很简单,但基准测试的努力往往会失败。第一个障碍通常是无法理解当前的工作是如何执行的。方法:通过线性流程图、连接图和跨功能流程图,团队确定过程中的每个步骤,查看过程中的人员如何交互,遵循工作流程,并标记步骤的类型。当这与支持文档相结合时,该方法为团队提供了一种直观地查看工作流程的方法,并知道哪里有故障,哪里工作进展顺利。结果:通过流程图,基准测试团队可以了解他们在做什么,这样他们就知道在基准测试合作伙伴中寻找什么,以及如何确定卓越绩效的促成因素。结论:没有流程图,团队将无法从基准测试中获得最大的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flow chart to benchmark.

Background: Benchmarking is the process used to search for best-in-class, compare results, discover the enablers of superior process performance, and take action to achieve quantum process improvement. It sounds simple, but all too often benchmarking efforts fail. The first obstacle often is failing to understand how work is currently being performed.

Methods: Through linear flow charts, connection charts, and cross-functional flow charts, teams identify each step in a process, see how the people in the process interact, follow the work flow, and label the type of a step. When this is accompanied by supporting documentation, this method provides teams a way to visually see the work flow and know where there are glitches and where things are going well.

Results: Through flow charting, benchmarking teams can understand what they are doing so they know what to look for in a benchmarking partner and how to identify the enablers of a superior performance.

Conclusions: Without flow charting, teams will not get the maximum benefit from benchmarking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring patient satisfaction in healthcare organizations: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Clinical risk modification, quality, and patient safety: interrelationships, problems, and future potential. Disease management: Lovelace Health Systems episodes of care--a case study. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process. Academic health center teaching hospitals in transition: a perspective from the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1