院前护理,早期干预对预后的重要性。

G Regel, M Stalp, U Lehmann, A Seekamp
{"title":"院前护理,早期干预对预后的重要性。","authors":"G Regel,&nbsp;M Stalp,&nbsp;U Lehmann,&nbsp;A Seekamp","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF) In a retrospective analysis 1223 polytraumatized patients treated during 1984 and 1994, with an injury severity of more than 20 points according to the Injury Severity Score = ISS, on-scene therapy (\"field stabilization\") was evaluated. We could show that a sufficient preclinical airway management has major influence on late prognosis (MOF). We therefore definitely recommend early intubation at the scene in these patients. The intravenous access at the emergency place is always necessary independent whether the patient is in hemorrhagic shock or not. Loss of time can increase shock mechanisms making intravenous access even more difficult. If there is already a peripheral vasoconstriction and the localisation of an peripheral vein renders more difficult, one possibility is a venae section to get safe access. Concerning the amount of preclinical infusion controverse opinions exist. Our evaluation could not give an satisfactory statement because of a differing high incidence of mass bleeding in the groups with low (< 1000 ml) and high (> 2000 ml) preclinical infusion. The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. Especially in those injuries, that are directly associated with the development of early death, i.e. intracranial bleeding, massive hemorrhage from thoracic and intraabdominal lesions these regimens on scene improved survival significantly (Fig 1) (Trunkey 1983). Nevertheless it is still discussed whether a longer rescue time is then justified to intensify on scene therapy. Recent publications demonstrate for instance that infusion therapy beginning on scene is not always necessary and sometimes especially in severe hemorrhagic shock can even aggrevate bleeding (Bickell 1989, Bickell 1991, Bickell 1993, Crawford 1991, Gross 1988, Stern 1993). On the other hand the value of on scene intubation and ventilation and chest tubing in these patients is critically discussed (Mattox 1989). Most of these studies however have their origin in the USA and are related exclusively to penetrating trauma (knife and gunshot wounds), which is completely different from underlying pathomechanisms (pure hemorrhagic shock). Only one reports of the same experience with blunt trauma (Barone 1986). Thus for severe blunt trauma the question is still open: \"field stabilization\" or \"load and go\" (Krausz 1992). A decision that always has to be related to the definite rescue time (Smith 1985). It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF).</p>","PeriodicalId":75373,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"110 ","pages":"71-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x","citationCount":"79","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital care, importance of early intervention on outcome.\",\"authors\":\"G Regel,&nbsp;M Stalp,&nbsp;U Lehmann,&nbsp;A Seekamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF) In a retrospective analysis 1223 polytraumatized patients treated during 1984 and 1994, with an injury severity of more than 20 points according to the Injury Severity Score = ISS, on-scene therapy (\\\"field stabilization\\\") was evaluated. We could show that a sufficient preclinical airway management has major influence on late prognosis (MOF). We therefore definitely recommend early intubation at the scene in these patients. The intravenous access at the emergency place is always necessary independent whether the patient is in hemorrhagic shock or not. Loss of time can increase shock mechanisms making intravenous access even more difficult. If there is already a peripheral vasoconstriction and the localisation of an peripheral vein renders more difficult, one possibility is a venae section to get safe access. Concerning the amount of preclinical infusion controverse opinions exist. Our evaluation could not give an satisfactory statement because of a differing high incidence of mass bleeding in the groups with low (< 1000 ml) and high (> 2000 ml) preclinical infusion. The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. Especially in those injuries, that are directly associated with the development of early death, i.e. intracranial bleeding, massive hemorrhage from thoracic and intraabdominal lesions these regimens on scene improved survival significantly (Fig 1) (Trunkey 1983). Nevertheless it is still discussed whether a longer rescue time is then justified to intensify on scene therapy. Recent publications demonstrate for instance that infusion therapy beginning on scene is not always necessary and sometimes especially in severe hemorrhagic shock can even aggrevate bleeding (Bickell 1989, Bickell 1991, Bickell 1993, Crawford 1991, Gross 1988, Stern 1993). On the other hand the value of on scene intubation and ventilation and chest tubing in these patients is critically discussed (Mattox 1989). Most of these studies however have their origin in the USA and are related exclusively to penetrating trauma (knife and gunshot wounds), which is completely different from underlying pathomechanisms (pure hemorrhagic shock). Only one reports of the same experience with blunt trauma (Barone 1986). Thus for severe blunt trauma the question is still open: \\\"field stabilization\\\" or \\\"load and go\\\" (Krausz 1992). A decision that always has to be related to the definite rescue time (Smith 1985). It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"71-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x\",\"citationCount\":\"79\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05508.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

摘要

救援系统和现场治疗的改进导致早期创伤后死亡的显著减少。本研究的目的是批判性地分析院前护理在早期和延迟并发症(单= SOF或多器官衰竭= MOF)方面的价值。回顾性分析了1984年至1994年期间治疗的1223例多创伤患者,根据损伤严重程度评分= ISS,损伤严重程度超过20分,评估了现场治疗(“现场稳定”)。我们可以证明充分的临床前气道管理对晚期预后(MOF)有重大影响。因此,我们强烈建议在这些患者现场早期插管。无论病人是否发生失血性休克,急诊静脉通路始终是必要的。时间的损失会增加休克机制,使静脉注射更加困难。如果已经有周围血管收缩,并且周围静脉的定位变得更加困难,一种可能性是静脉切片以获得安全的通道。关于临床前输注量存在争议。我们的评估不能给出令人满意的结论,因为临床前低输液量(< 1000 ml)和高输液量(> 2000 ml)组的大出血发生率不同。救援系统和现场治疗的改进导致早期创伤后死亡的显著减少。特别是那些与早期死亡直接相关的损伤,如颅内出血、胸部大出血和腹腔内病变,这些方案在现场显著提高了生存率(图1)(Trunkey 1983)。然而,是否需要更长的抢救时间来加强现场治疗仍在讨论中。例如,最近的出版物表明,现场开始的输液治疗并不总是必要的,有时特别是在严重的失血性休克中甚至会聚集出血(Bickell 1989, Bickell 1991, Bickell 1993, Crawford 1991, Gross 1988, Stern 1993)。另一方面,现场插管和通气以及胸管对这些患者的价值进行了批判性的讨论(Mattox 1989)。然而,这些研究大多起源于美国,并且专门与穿透性创伤(刀伤和枪伤)有关,这与潜在的病理机制(纯粹的失血性休克)完全不同。只有一个钝性创伤的相同经验报告(Barone 1986)。因此,对于严重的钝性创伤,问题仍然是开放的:“现场稳定”还是“加载并离开”(Krausz 1992)。一个总是与确定的救援时间有关的决定(史密斯1985)。本研究的目的是批判性地分析院前护理在早期和延迟并发症(单器官= SOF或多器官衰竭= MOF)方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prehospital care, importance of early intervention on outcome.

The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF) In a retrospective analysis 1223 polytraumatized patients treated during 1984 and 1994, with an injury severity of more than 20 points according to the Injury Severity Score = ISS, on-scene therapy ("field stabilization") was evaluated. We could show that a sufficient preclinical airway management has major influence on late prognosis (MOF). We therefore definitely recommend early intubation at the scene in these patients. The intravenous access at the emergency place is always necessary independent whether the patient is in hemorrhagic shock or not. Loss of time can increase shock mechanisms making intravenous access even more difficult. If there is already a peripheral vasoconstriction and the localisation of an peripheral vein renders more difficult, one possibility is a venae section to get safe access. Concerning the amount of preclinical infusion controverse opinions exist. Our evaluation could not give an satisfactory statement because of a differing high incidence of mass bleeding in the groups with low (< 1000 ml) and high (> 2000 ml) preclinical infusion. The improvement of rescue systems and on-scene therapy has lead to a significant reduction of early posttraumatic death. Especially in those injuries, that are directly associated with the development of early death, i.e. intracranial bleeding, massive hemorrhage from thoracic and intraabdominal lesions these regimens on scene improved survival significantly (Fig 1) (Trunkey 1983). Nevertheless it is still discussed whether a longer rescue time is then justified to intensify on scene therapy. Recent publications demonstrate for instance that infusion therapy beginning on scene is not always necessary and sometimes especially in severe hemorrhagic shock can even aggrevate bleeding (Bickell 1989, Bickell 1991, Bickell 1993, Crawford 1991, Gross 1988, Stern 1993). On the other hand the value of on scene intubation and ventilation and chest tubing in these patients is critically discussed (Mattox 1989). Most of these studies however have their origin in the USA and are related exclusively to penetrating trauma (knife and gunshot wounds), which is completely different from underlying pathomechanisms (pure hemorrhagic shock). Only one reports of the same experience with blunt trauma (Barone 1986). Thus for severe blunt trauma the question is still open: "field stabilization" or "load and go" (Krausz 1992). A decision that always has to be related to the definite rescue time (Smith 1985). It was the goal of this study to critically analyse the value of prehospital care in respect to early but also to delayed complications (single = SOF or multiple organ failure = MOF).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiologists, 30th Congress, 10-13 June 2009, Odense, Denmark. Abstracts from the 29th Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 5-8 September 2007, Goteborg, Sweden. CHAPTER 7 – Brain Resuscitation Abstracts from the 28th Congress of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland. Abstracts from the 27th Congress of The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. August 16-20, 2003, Helsinki, Finland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1