克拉霉素混悬液与阿莫西林糖浆治疗儿童咽炎和/或扁桃体炎的比较。

N L Kearsley, A Campbell, A A Sanderson, R D Weir, M K Kamdar, S J Coles
{"title":"克拉霉素混悬液与阿莫西林糖浆治疗儿童咽炎和/或扁桃体炎的比较。","authors":"N L Kearsley,&nbsp;A Campbell,&nbsp;A A Sanderson,&nbsp;R D Weir,&nbsp;M K Kamdar,&nbsp;S J Coles","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-three general practices in the UK randomised 229 paediatric patients (aged 1-12 years, body weight > 8 kg) with clinical evidence suggestive of streptococcal tonsillitis and/or pharyngitis in this physician-blind study. Patients received either clarithromycin suspension (7.5 mg/kg twice daily) or amoxycillin syrup (125 mg/kg three times daily body weight < 25 kg, or 250 mg/kg three times daily body weight 25 kg) for 7 days and were followed up 3-8 days post treatment and 21-28 days later. Clinical and microbiological assessments were made at each visit. A total of 189 patients (98 on clarithromycin and 91 on amoxycillin) were clinically evaluable. At the post-treatment visit, clinical success rates were high and comparable: 98% on clarithromycin and 97% on amoxycillin. Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated in 88% of clarithromycin patients and 86% of amoxycillin patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, clarithromycin suspension was as safe and at least as effective as amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis in children, and would be a suitable alternative therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"51 3","pages":"133-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clarithromycin suspension and amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of children with pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis.\",\"authors\":\"N L Kearsley,&nbsp;A Campbell,&nbsp;A A Sanderson,&nbsp;R D Weir,&nbsp;M K Kamdar,&nbsp;S J Coles\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Twenty-three general practices in the UK randomised 229 paediatric patients (aged 1-12 years, body weight > 8 kg) with clinical evidence suggestive of streptococcal tonsillitis and/or pharyngitis in this physician-blind study. Patients received either clarithromycin suspension (7.5 mg/kg twice daily) or amoxycillin syrup (125 mg/kg three times daily body weight < 25 kg, or 250 mg/kg three times daily body weight 25 kg) for 7 days and were followed up 3-8 days post treatment and 21-28 days later. Clinical and microbiological assessments were made at each visit. A total of 189 patients (98 on clarithromycin and 91 on amoxycillin) were clinically evaluable. At the post-treatment visit, clinical success rates were high and comparable: 98% on clarithromycin and 97% on amoxycillin. Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated in 88% of clarithromycin patients and 86% of amoxycillin patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, clarithromycin suspension was as safe and at least as effective as amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis in children, and would be a suitable alternative therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"133-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项医生盲法研究中,英国23家全科医院随机选取229例临床证据提示链球菌扁桃体炎和/或咽炎的儿童患者(年龄1-12岁,体重> 8kg)。患者接受克拉霉素混悬液(7.5 mg/kg每日2次)或阿莫西林糖浆(125 mg/kg每日3次体重< 25 kg,或250 mg/kg每日3次体重25 kg)治疗7天,治疗后3-8天和21-28天随访。在每次访问时进行临床和微生物学评估。共有189例患者(克拉霉素组98例,阿莫西林组91例)具有临床可评价性。在治疗后的随访中,临床成功率很高且具有可比性:克拉霉素组为98%,阿莫西林组为97%。88%的克拉霉素患者和86%的阿莫西林患者的化脓性链球菌被根除。两种治疗方法均耐受良好。综上所述,克拉霉素混悬液与阿莫西林糖浆治疗儿童咽炎和/或扁桃体炎一样安全,至少同样有效,是一种合适的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of clarithromycin suspension and amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of children with pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis.

Twenty-three general practices in the UK randomised 229 paediatric patients (aged 1-12 years, body weight > 8 kg) with clinical evidence suggestive of streptococcal tonsillitis and/or pharyngitis in this physician-blind study. Patients received either clarithromycin suspension (7.5 mg/kg twice daily) or amoxycillin syrup (125 mg/kg three times daily body weight < 25 kg, or 250 mg/kg three times daily body weight 25 kg) for 7 days and were followed up 3-8 days post treatment and 21-28 days later. Clinical and microbiological assessments were made at each visit. A total of 189 patients (98 on clarithromycin and 91 on amoxycillin) were clinically evaluable. At the post-treatment visit, clinical success rates were high and comparable: 98% on clarithromycin and 97% on amoxycillin. Streptococcus pyogenes was eradicated in 88% of clarithromycin patients and 86% of amoxycillin patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, clarithromycin suspension was as safe and at least as effective as amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis in children, and would be a suitable alternative therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CANCER PREVENTION. COLIC. Diabetes mellitus. Renal artery stenosis. Tirofiban--spinning the data from fact to hype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1