人体被动脚趾运动后的体感诱发磁场和电位

Jing Xiang, Ryusuke Kakigi, Minoru Hoshiyama, Yoshiki Kaneoke, Daisuke Naka, Yasuyuki Takeshima, Sachiko Koyama
{"title":"人体被动脚趾运动后的体感诱发磁场和电位","authors":"Jing Xiang,&nbsp;Ryusuke Kakigi,&nbsp;Minoru Hoshiyama,&nbsp;Yoshiki Kaneoke,&nbsp;Daisuke Naka,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Takeshima,&nbsp;Sachiko Koyama","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00058-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and evoked potentials<span> (SEPs) following passive toe movement were studied in 10 normal subjects. Five main components were identified in SEFs recorded around the vertex around the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI). The first and second components, 1M and 2M, were identified at approximately 35 and 46 ms. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of both 1M and 2M were estimated around SI in the hemisphere contralateral to the movement toe, and were probably generated in area 3a or area 2, which mainly receive inputs ascending through muscle and joint afferents. The large inter-individual difference of 1M and 2M in terms of ECD orientation was probably due to a large anatomical variance of the foot area of SI. The third and fourth components, 3M and 4M, were identified at approximately 62 ms and 87 ms, respectively. They appeared to be a single large long-duration component with two peaks. Since the 3M and 4M components were significantly larger than the 1M and 2M components in amplitude and their ECD location was significantly superior to that of 1M and 2M, we suspected that they were generated in different sites from those of 1M and 2M, probably area 3b or area 4. Four components, 1E, 2E, 3E and 4E, were identified in SEPs, which appeared to correspond to 1M, 2M, 3M and 4M, respectively. The variation observed in the scalp distribution of the primary component, 1E, could be accounted for by the variation of the orientation of ECD of the 1M component. There was a large difference in the waveform of the long-latency component (longer than 100 ms) between SEFs and SEPs. The 5E of SEPs was a large amplitude component, but the 5M of SEFs was small or absent. We speculate that this long-latency component was generated by multiple generators.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 5","pages":"Pages 393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00058-0","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following passive toe movement in humans\",\"authors\":\"Jing Xiang,&nbsp;Ryusuke Kakigi,&nbsp;Minoru Hoshiyama,&nbsp;Yoshiki Kaneoke,&nbsp;Daisuke Naka,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Takeshima,&nbsp;Sachiko Koyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00058-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and evoked potentials<span> (SEPs) following passive toe movement were studied in 10 normal subjects. Five main components were identified in SEFs recorded around the vertex around the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI). The first and second components, 1M and 2M, were identified at approximately 35 and 46 ms. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of both 1M and 2M were estimated around SI in the hemisphere contralateral to the movement toe, and were probably generated in area 3a or area 2, which mainly receive inputs ascending through muscle and joint afferents. The large inter-individual difference of 1M and 2M in terms of ECD orientation was probably due to a large anatomical variance of the foot area of SI. The third and fourth components, 3M and 4M, were identified at approximately 62 ms and 87 ms, respectively. They appeared to be a single large long-duration component with two peaks. Since the 3M and 4M components were significantly larger than the 1M and 2M components in amplitude and their ECD location was significantly superior to that of 1M and 2M, we suspected that they were generated in different sites from those of 1M and 2M, probably area 3b or area 4. Four components, 1E, 2E, 3E and 4E, were identified in SEPs, which appeared to correspond to 1M, 2M, 3M and 4M, respectively. The variation observed in the scalp distribution of the primary component, 1E, could be accounted for by the variation of the orientation of ECD of the 1M component. There was a large difference in the waveform of the long-latency component (longer than 100 ms) between SEFs and SEPs. The 5E of SEPs was a large amplitude component, but the 5M of SEFs was small or absent. We speculate that this long-latency component was generated by multiple generators.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 393-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00058-0\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

研究了10例正常人被动脚趾运动后的体感诱发磁场(SEFs)和诱发电位(sep)。在初级感觉皮层(SI)足部周围顶点周围记录的sef中鉴定出五种主要成分。第一和第二组分1M和2M在大约35和46 ms时被识别出来。在运动趾对侧半球的SI周围估计有1M和2M的等效电流偶极子(ECDs),可能产生于3a区或2区,主要通过肌肉和关节传入神经接收上行输入。1M和2M在ECD方向上的较大个体间差异可能是由于SI足部面积的较大解剖差异。第三和第四组分3M和4M分别在大约62 ms和87 ms时被鉴定出来。它们似乎是一个具有两个峰的大而长时间的成分。由于3M和4M分量的振幅明显大于1M和2M分量,且其ECD位置明显优于1M和2M,我们怀疑它们产生于与1M和2M不同的位置,可能是3b区或4区。在SEPs中鉴定出1E、2E、3E和4E四个成分,分别对应1M、2M、3M和4M。主要成分1E在头皮分布上的变化可以通过1M成分ECD方向的变化来解释。长潜伏期分量(大于100 ms)的波形在sef和sep之间存在较大差异。SEPs的5E是一个大振幅分量,而SEFs的5M较小或不存在。我们推测这个长延迟组件是由多个生成器生成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following passive toe movement in humans

The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and evoked potentials (SEPs) following passive toe movement were studied in 10 normal subjects. Five main components were identified in SEFs recorded around the vertex around the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI). The first and second components, 1M and 2M, were identified at approximately 35 and 46 ms. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of both 1M and 2M were estimated around SI in the hemisphere contralateral to the movement toe, and were probably generated in area 3a or area 2, which mainly receive inputs ascending through muscle and joint afferents. The large inter-individual difference of 1M and 2M in terms of ECD orientation was probably due to a large anatomical variance of the foot area of SI. The third and fourth components, 3M and 4M, were identified at approximately 62 ms and 87 ms, respectively. They appeared to be a single large long-duration component with two peaks. Since the 3M and 4M components were significantly larger than the 1M and 2M components in amplitude and their ECD location was significantly superior to that of 1M and 2M, we suspected that they were generated in different sites from those of 1M and 2M, probably area 3b or area 4. Four components, 1E, 2E, 3E and 4E, were identified in SEPs, which appeared to correspond to 1M, 2M, 3M and 4M, respectively. The variation observed in the scalp distribution of the primary component, 1E, could be accounted for by the variation of the orientation of ECD of the 1M component. There was a large difference in the waveform of the long-latency component (longer than 100 ms) between SEFs and SEPs. The 5E of SEPs was a large amplitude component, but the 5M of SEFs was small or absent. We speculate that this long-latency component was generated by multiple generators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1