辅导员评估护理学生。

O Yonge, H Krahn, L Trojan, D Reid
{"title":"辅导员评估护理学生。","authors":"O Yonge,&nbsp;H Krahn,&nbsp;L Trojan,&nbsp;D Reid","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this exploratory, descriptive survey of 295 nursing preceptors it was found that 98.3 per cent had evaluated nursing students. They cited numerous reasons as to why they should be involved in the evaluation process. Only 28.8 per cent had been taught to evaluate and 5.4 per cent had failed students. There is a discrepancy between how little preceptors are prepared for the evaluation role and how frequently they are expected to do so. Consequently, there is an onus on nurse educators to prepare clear evaluation forms, to assess students for suitability for preceptorship experiences, and to recognize evaluation as part of the preceptor's professional relationship with the student.</p>","PeriodicalId":77058,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","volume":"10 2","pages":"77-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preceptors evaluating nursing students.\",\"authors\":\"O Yonge,&nbsp;H Krahn,&nbsp;L Trojan,&nbsp;D Reid\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this exploratory, descriptive survey of 295 nursing preceptors it was found that 98.3 per cent had evaluated nursing students. They cited numerous reasons as to why they should be involved in the evaluation process. Only 28.8 per cent had been taught to evaluate and 5.4 per cent had failed students. There is a discrepancy between how little preceptors are prepared for the evaluation role and how frequently they are expected to do so. Consequently, there is an onus on nurse educators to prepare clear evaluation forms, to assess students for suitability for preceptorship experiences, and to recognize evaluation as part of the preceptor's professional relationship with the student.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"77-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这个探索性的描述性调查中,295名护理导师长发现98.3%的人评估过护理学生。他们列举了许多理由来说明为什么他们应该参与评价过程。只有28.8%的教师教过如何评价学生,5.4%的教师教过不及格的学生。教师为评价角色做准备的程度与期望他们这样做的频率之间存在差异。因此,护士教育工作者有责任准备清晰的评估表格,评估学生是否适合担任导师,并将评估视为导师与学生专业关系的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preceptors evaluating nursing students.

In this exploratory, descriptive survey of 295 nursing preceptors it was found that 98.3 per cent had evaluated nursing students. They cited numerous reasons as to why they should be involved in the evaluation process. Only 28.8 per cent had been taught to evaluate and 5.4 per cent had failed students. There is a discrepancy between how little preceptors are prepared for the evaluation role and how frequently they are expected to do so. Consequently, there is an onus on nurse educators to prepare clear evaluation forms, to assess students for suitability for preceptorship experiences, and to recognize evaluation as part of the preceptor's professional relationship with the student.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home care--when will the information age arrive? Perspective: the world, your work and you! Witmer establishes provincial task force to review nursing services. Health care issues: managing services and people in home care: today's challenge. Bridging the gap: medical directives for acute care nurse practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1