{"title":"血友病的基因治疗。","authors":"J Walter, K A High","doi":"10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many lines of evidence that suggest the eventual success of gene therapy as a treatment strategy for hemophilia. Because current treatment protocols using plasma-derived or recombinant proteins are far from ideal, the safe and efficient substitution of the defective gene by a normal copy of the gene, or at least its addition, would be of great benefit to the patient and may even be a potential cure. However, the construction of efficient gene therapy vehicles has proven quite difficult in the past and, so far, there is no system that promises to have all the desired features without any serious disadvantages. In general, either the levels of transgene expression are too low (because of the low titers achieved during the generation of the virus) or shortlived (e.g., because of the specific shut-off of the transferred promoter) as is often seen with retroviruses, or in the case of adenoviral vectors, expression is limited because of a strong immune response of the host. Clearly, much work remains to be done to optimize these promising though still imperfect vector systems. In the case of adenovirus, the development of less immunogenic vectors or in vivo modulation of the host immune system may hold promise for improvements. Reports by Yang et al. (1995) and Kay et al. (1995) are promising steps in the direction of immunomodulation. Both attenuate the immune reaction to the adenoviral vector by simultaneous application of either an interleukin or an immunoglobulin, respectively. When IL-2 was administered, the amounts of IgA were reduced and successful administration of a second dose of virus was possible. When CTLA4-Ig, an immunoglobulin that blocks the second signal during antigen presentation, was administered, a markedly prolonged expression of the transgene resulted. In vivo trials with AAV vectors have been carried out for some diseases (Flotte et al., 1993; Kaplitt et al., 1994) but not for hemophilia. Advances in high-titer AAV vector preparation will make this approach more feasible. The pace continues to quicken in the development of nonviral modes of gene delivery (Perales et al., 1994). Although these results are encouraging for the future of gene therapy as a treatment for genetic diseases, much work remains to be done to make this potential alternative a reality for treatment of hemophilia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72111,"journal":{"name":"Advances in veterinary medicine","volume":"40 ","pages":"119-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gene therapy for the hemophilias.\",\"authors\":\"J Walter, K A High\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are many lines of evidence that suggest the eventual success of gene therapy as a treatment strategy for hemophilia. Because current treatment protocols using plasma-derived or recombinant proteins are far from ideal, the safe and efficient substitution of the defective gene by a normal copy of the gene, or at least its addition, would be of great benefit to the patient and may even be a potential cure. However, the construction of efficient gene therapy vehicles has proven quite difficult in the past and, so far, there is no system that promises to have all the desired features without any serious disadvantages. In general, either the levels of transgene expression are too low (because of the low titers achieved during the generation of the virus) or shortlived (e.g., because of the specific shut-off of the transferred promoter) as is often seen with retroviruses, or in the case of adenoviral vectors, expression is limited because of a strong immune response of the host. Clearly, much work remains to be done to optimize these promising though still imperfect vector systems. In the case of adenovirus, the development of less immunogenic vectors or in vivo modulation of the host immune system may hold promise for improvements. Reports by Yang et al. (1995) and Kay et al. (1995) are promising steps in the direction of immunomodulation. Both attenuate the immune reaction to the adenoviral vector by simultaneous application of either an interleukin or an immunoglobulin, respectively. When IL-2 was administered, the amounts of IgA were reduced and successful administration of a second dose of virus was possible. When CTLA4-Ig, an immunoglobulin that blocks the second signal during antigen presentation, was administered, a markedly prolonged expression of the transgene resulted. In vivo trials with AAV vectors have been carried out for some diseases (Flotte et al., 1993; Kaplitt et al., 1994) but not for hemophilia. Advances in high-titer AAV vector preparation will make this approach more feasible. The pace continues to quicken in the development of nonviral modes of gene delivery (Perales et al., 1994). Although these results are encouraging for the future of gene therapy as a treatment for genetic diseases, much work remains to be done to make this potential alternative a reality for treatment of hemophilia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"119-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3519(97)80006-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
有许多证据表明基因疗法作为血友病治疗策略的最终成功。由于目前使用血浆衍生蛋白或重组蛋白的治疗方案远不理想,因此用正常基因拷贝安全有效地替代缺陷基因,或至少添加缺陷基因,将对患者大有裨益,甚至可能成为潜在的治愈方法。然而,有效的基因治疗载体的构建在过去被证明是相当困难的,到目前为止,还没有一个系统承诺具有所有期望的特征而没有任何严重的缺点。一般来说,转基因表达水平太低(因为在病毒产生过程中达到的滴度很低)或寿命很短(例如,因为转移的启动子的特异性关闭),这在逆转录病毒中很常见,或者在腺病毒载体的情况下,由于宿主的强烈免疫反应,表达受到限制。显然,要优化这些有前途但仍不完善的矢量系统,还有很多工作要做。在腺病毒的情况下,开发免疫原性较低的载体或在体内调节宿主免疫系统可能有改善的希望。Yang等人(1995)和Kay等人(1995)的报告是在免疫调节方向上有希望的一步。这两种方法分别通过同时应用白细胞介素或免疫球蛋白来减弱对腺病毒载体的免疫反应。当给予IL-2时,IgA的数量减少,并且成功地给予第二剂病毒是可能的。当CTLA4-Ig(一种在抗原呈递过程中阻断第二信号的免疫球蛋白)被施用时,转基因的表达明显延长。对一些疾病进行了AAV载体的体内试验(Flotte等人,1993年;Kaplitt et al., 1994),但对血友病无效。高滴度AAV载体制备的进展将使这种方法更加可行。基因传递的非病毒模式的发展速度继续加快(Perales等人,1994)。尽管这些结果对基因治疗作为一种遗传性疾病的治疗方法的未来是令人鼓舞的,但要使这种潜在的替代方法成为治疗血友病的现实,还有很多工作要做。
There are many lines of evidence that suggest the eventual success of gene therapy as a treatment strategy for hemophilia. Because current treatment protocols using plasma-derived or recombinant proteins are far from ideal, the safe and efficient substitution of the defective gene by a normal copy of the gene, or at least its addition, would be of great benefit to the patient and may even be a potential cure. However, the construction of efficient gene therapy vehicles has proven quite difficult in the past and, so far, there is no system that promises to have all the desired features without any serious disadvantages. In general, either the levels of transgene expression are too low (because of the low titers achieved during the generation of the virus) or shortlived (e.g., because of the specific shut-off of the transferred promoter) as is often seen with retroviruses, or in the case of adenoviral vectors, expression is limited because of a strong immune response of the host. Clearly, much work remains to be done to optimize these promising though still imperfect vector systems. In the case of adenovirus, the development of less immunogenic vectors or in vivo modulation of the host immune system may hold promise for improvements. Reports by Yang et al. (1995) and Kay et al. (1995) are promising steps in the direction of immunomodulation. Both attenuate the immune reaction to the adenoviral vector by simultaneous application of either an interleukin or an immunoglobulin, respectively. When IL-2 was administered, the amounts of IgA were reduced and successful administration of a second dose of virus was possible. When CTLA4-Ig, an immunoglobulin that blocks the second signal during antigen presentation, was administered, a markedly prolonged expression of the transgene resulted. In vivo trials with AAV vectors have been carried out for some diseases (Flotte et al., 1993; Kaplitt et al., 1994) but not for hemophilia. Advances in high-titer AAV vector preparation will make this approach more feasible. The pace continues to quicken in the development of nonviral modes of gene delivery (Perales et al., 1994). Although these results are encouraging for the future of gene therapy as a treatment for genetic diseases, much work remains to be done to make this potential alternative a reality for treatment of hemophilia.