德克萨斯州狂犬病动物流行病的分子流行病学研究

Rodney E. Rohde , Susan U. Neill , Keith A. Clark , Jean S. Smith
{"title":"德克萨斯州狂犬病动物流行病的分子流行病学研究","authors":"Rodney E. Rohde ,&nbsp;Susan U. Neill ,&nbsp;Keith A. Clark ,&nbsp;Jean S. Smith","doi":"10.1016/S0928-0197(97)10003-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Texas is in the midst of two independent epizootics of rabies, involving coyotes (<em>Canis latrans</em>) and domestic dogs (<em>Canis familiaris</em>) in southern Texas and grey foxes (<em>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</em>) in west central Texas. The domestic dog/coyote (DDC) and grey fox (TF) rabies virus variants cannot be differentiated by antigenic typing with currently available monoclonal antibodies. These two variants also cannot be distinguished from a third variant, Sonora dog (SD) rabies, that is not enzootic in Texas, but occasionally occurs in animals along the western border with Mexico.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To determine a method for the differentiation of the DDC, TF and SD variants, which is essential for epidemiologic monitoring of the Oral Rabies Vaccination Program (ORVP), a program instituted to control rabies in coyotes and grey foxes in Texas.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Primers complementary to nucleoprotein sequence of either the DDC or TF rabies virus permit specific reverse transcription and amplification by polymerase chain reaction. In addition, general primers, which recognize a broad range of rabies variants, used in conjunction with a restriction digest for the differentiation of DDC, TF or SD rabies virus were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results and Conclusions:</strong> Of 122 specimens tested with specific primers, 111 (91%) were specifically identified as either DDC (33 samples) or TF (78 samples). Overly stringent conditions, enzyme inhibitors, or limiting RNA may account for the 11 non-amplifications. Amplification of RNA under less stringent conditions, with primers recognizing a broad range of rabies variants followed by digestion with either restriction enzyme <em>Desulfovibrio desulfuricans I</em> (<em>Dde</em>I) or <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em> Rf. (<em>Hin</em>fI), was used to identify the 11 isolates that did not amplify with specific primers (6 DDC, 4 TF and 1 SD). In addition to these 11 isolates, the less stringent method of amplification, followed by enzyme digestion has identified a total of 125 additional specimens (26 DDC, 94 TF and 5 SD) that were not tested by variant-specific amplification. These data provide a means to track the spread of the different rabies virus variants and allow the ORVP to plan its vaccine disbursement by defining the two epizootic boundaries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79479,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(97)10003-4","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular epidemiology of rabies epizootics in Texas\",\"authors\":\"Rodney E. Rohde ,&nbsp;Susan U. Neill ,&nbsp;Keith A. Clark ,&nbsp;Jean S. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0928-0197(97)10003-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Texas is in the midst of two independent epizootics of rabies, involving coyotes (<em>Canis latrans</em>) and domestic dogs (<em>Canis familiaris</em>) in southern Texas and grey foxes (<em>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</em>) in west central Texas. The domestic dog/coyote (DDC) and grey fox (TF) rabies virus variants cannot be differentiated by antigenic typing with currently available monoclonal antibodies. These two variants also cannot be distinguished from a third variant, Sonora dog (SD) rabies, that is not enzootic in Texas, but occasionally occurs in animals along the western border with Mexico.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> To determine a method for the differentiation of the DDC, TF and SD variants, which is essential for epidemiologic monitoring of the Oral Rabies Vaccination Program (ORVP), a program instituted to control rabies in coyotes and grey foxes in Texas.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Primers complementary to nucleoprotein sequence of either the DDC or TF rabies virus permit specific reverse transcription and amplification by polymerase chain reaction. In addition, general primers, which recognize a broad range of rabies variants, used in conjunction with a restriction digest for the differentiation of DDC, TF or SD rabies virus were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results and Conclusions:</strong> Of 122 specimens tested with specific primers, 111 (91%) were specifically identified as either DDC (33 samples) or TF (78 samples). Overly stringent conditions, enzyme inhibitors, or limiting RNA may account for the 11 non-amplifications. Amplification of RNA under less stringent conditions, with primers recognizing a broad range of rabies variants followed by digestion with either restriction enzyme <em>Desulfovibrio desulfuricans I</em> (<em>Dde</em>I) or <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em> Rf. (<em>Hin</em>fI), was used to identify the 11 isolates that did not amplify with specific primers (6 DDC, 4 TF and 1 SD). In addition to these 11 isolates, the less stringent method of amplification, followed by enzyme digestion has identified a total of 125 additional specimens (26 DDC, 94 TF and 5 SD) that were not tested by variant-specific amplification. These data provide a means to track the spread of the different rabies virus variants and allow the ORVP to plan its vaccine disbursement by defining the two epizootic boundaries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic virology\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 209-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-0197(97)10003-4\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019797100034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928019797100034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

背景:德克萨斯州正处于两种独立的狂犬病动物流行之中,涉及德克萨斯州南部的土狼(Canis latrans)和家犬(Canis familiaris),以及德克萨斯州中西部的灰狐(Urocyon cinereogenteus)。家犬/土狼(DDC)和灰狐(TF)狂犬病毒变体无法用现有的单克隆抗体进行抗原分型区分。这两种变体也无法与第三种变体索诺拉犬狂犬病(SD)区分开来,这种变体在德克萨斯州不是地方性的,但偶尔会发生在与墨西哥接壤的西部边境的动物身上。目的:确定一种区分DDC、TF和SD变异的方法,这对口服狂犬病疫苗接种计划(ORVP)的流行病学监测至关重要,ORVP计划是为了控制德克萨斯州的土狼和灰狐的狂犬病而制定的。研究设计:与DDC或TF狂犬病毒核蛋白序列互补的引物可以通过聚合酶链反应进行特异性的逆转录和扩增。此外,还研究了识别广泛狂犬病变异的通用引物与限制性摘要结合用于区分DDC、TF或SD狂犬病病毒的方法。结果与结论:在用特异引物检测的122例标本中,111例(91%)被明确鉴定为DDC(33例)或TF(78例)。过于严格的条件,酶抑制剂或限制性RNA可能导致11个不扩增。在较不严格的条件下扩增RNA,引物识别广泛的狂犬病变异,然后用限制性内切酶脱硫弧菌I (DdeI)或流感嗜血杆菌Rf消化。(HinfI),用特异性引物鉴定了11株未扩增的分离株(6株DDC, 4株TF和1株SD)。除了这11个分离株外,采用不太严格的扩增后酶切法共鉴定出125个未进行变异特异性扩增的样本(26个DDC, 94个TF和5个SD)。这些数据为跟踪不同狂犬病毒变种的传播提供了一种手段,并使预防狂犬病办公室能够通过确定两个动物流行病边界来规划其疫苗支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular epidemiology of rabies epizootics in Texas

Background: Texas is in the midst of two independent epizootics of rabies, involving coyotes (Canis latrans) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) in southern Texas and grey foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in west central Texas. The domestic dog/coyote (DDC) and grey fox (TF) rabies virus variants cannot be differentiated by antigenic typing with currently available monoclonal antibodies. These two variants also cannot be distinguished from a third variant, Sonora dog (SD) rabies, that is not enzootic in Texas, but occasionally occurs in animals along the western border with Mexico.

Objectives: To determine a method for the differentiation of the DDC, TF and SD variants, which is essential for epidemiologic monitoring of the Oral Rabies Vaccination Program (ORVP), a program instituted to control rabies in coyotes and grey foxes in Texas.

Study Design: Primers complementary to nucleoprotein sequence of either the DDC or TF rabies virus permit specific reverse transcription and amplification by polymerase chain reaction. In addition, general primers, which recognize a broad range of rabies variants, used in conjunction with a restriction digest for the differentiation of DDC, TF or SD rabies virus were investigated.

Results and Conclusions: Of 122 specimens tested with specific primers, 111 (91%) were specifically identified as either DDC (33 samples) or TF (78 samples). Overly stringent conditions, enzyme inhibitors, or limiting RNA may account for the 11 non-amplifications. Amplification of RNA under less stringent conditions, with primers recognizing a broad range of rabies variants followed by digestion with either restriction enzyme Desulfovibrio desulfuricans I (DdeI) or Haemophilus influenzae Rf. (HinfI), was used to identify the 11 isolates that did not amplify with specific primers (6 DDC, 4 TF and 1 SD). In addition to these 11 isolates, the less stringent method of amplification, followed by enzyme digestion has identified a total of 125 additional specimens (26 DDC, 94 TF and 5 SD) that were not tested by variant-specific amplification. These data provide a means to track the spread of the different rabies virus variants and allow the ORVP to plan its vaccine disbursement by defining the two epizootic boundaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Immune mediated and inherited defences against flaviviruses Maternal recognition of foetal infection with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV)—the bovine pestivirus The conformation of hepatitis C virus NS3 proteinase with and without NS4A: a structural basis for the activation of the enzyme by its cofactor Repression of the PKR protein kinase by the hepatitis C virus NS5A protein: a potential mechanism of interferon resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1