电化学一氧化碳监测仪在麻醉气体存在下的性能。

M Dunning, H J Woehlck
{"title":"电化学一氧化碳监测仪在麻醉气体存在下的性能。","authors":"M Dunning,&nbsp;H J Woehlck","doi":"10.1023/a:1007450826769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The passage of volatile anesthetic agents through accidentally dried CO2 absorbents in anesthesia circuits can result in the chemical breakdown of anesthetics with production of greater than 10000 ppm carbon monoxide (CO). This study was designed to evaluate a portable CO monitor in the presence of volatile anesthetic agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two portable CO monitors employing electrochemical sensors were tested to determine the effects of anesthetic agents, gas sample flow rates, and high CO concentrations on their electrochemical sensor. The portable CO monitors were exposed to gas mixtures of 0 to 500 ppm CO in either 70% nitrous oxide, 1 MAC concentrations of contemporary volatile anesthetics, or reacted isoflurane or desflurane (containing CO and CHF3) in oxygen. The CO measurements from the electrochemical sensors were compared to simultaneously obtained samples measured by gas chromatography (GC). Data were analyzed by linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall correlation between the portable CO monitors and the GC resulted in an r2 value >0.98 for all anesthetic agents. Sequestered samples produced an exponential decay of measured CO with time, whereas stable measurements were maintained during continuous flow across the sensor. Increasing flow rates resulted in higher CO readings. Exposing the CO sensor to 3000 and 19000 ppm CO resulted in maximum reported concentrations of approximately 1250 ppm, with a prolonged recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decrease in measured concentration of the sequestered samples suggests destruction of the sample by the sensor, whereas a diffusion limitation is suggested by the dependency of measured value upon flow. Any value over 500 ppm must be assumed to represent dangerous concentrations of CO because of the non-linear response of these monitors at very high CO concentrations. These portable electrochemical CO monitors are adequate to measure CO concentrations up to 500 ppm in the presence of typical clinical concentrations of anesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":77199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical monitoring","volume":"13 6","pages":"357-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007450826769","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of an electrochemical carbon monoxide monitor in the presence of anesthetic gases.\",\"authors\":\"M Dunning,&nbsp;H J Woehlck\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1007450826769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The passage of volatile anesthetic agents through accidentally dried CO2 absorbents in anesthesia circuits can result in the chemical breakdown of anesthetics with production of greater than 10000 ppm carbon monoxide (CO). This study was designed to evaluate a portable CO monitor in the presence of volatile anesthetic agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two portable CO monitors employing electrochemical sensors were tested to determine the effects of anesthetic agents, gas sample flow rates, and high CO concentrations on their electrochemical sensor. The portable CO monitors were exposed to gas mixtures of 0 to 500 ppm CO in either 70% nitrous oxide, 1 MAC concentrations of contemporary volatile anesthetics, or reacted isoflurane or desflurane (containing CO and CHF3) in oxygen. The CO measurements from the electrochemical sensors were compared to simultaneously obtained samples measured by gas chromatography (GC). Data were analyzed by linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall correlation between the portable CO monitors and the GC resulted in an r2 value >0.98 for all anesthetic agents. Sequestered samples produced an exponential decay of measured CO with time, whereas stable measurements were maintained during continuous flow across the sensor. Increasing flow rates resulted in higher CO readings. Exposing the CO sensor to 3000 and 19000 ppm CO resulted in maximum reported concentrations of approximately 1250 ppm, with a prolonged recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decrease in measured concentration of the sequestered samples suggests destruction of the sample by the sensor, whereas a diffusion limitation is suggested by the dependency of measured value upon flow. Any value over 500 ppm must be assumed to represent dangerous concentrations of CO because of the non-linear response of these monitors at very high CO concentrations. These portable electrochemical CO monitors are adequate to measure CO concentrations up to 500 ppm in the presence of typical clinical concentrations of anesthetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"357-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1007450826769\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007450826769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007450826769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:麻醉回路中挥发性麻醉剂通过意外干燥的CO2吸收剂可导致麻醉剂化学分解,产生大于10000ppm的一氧化碳(CO)。本研究旨在评估挥发性麻醉剂存在下的便携式一氧化碳监测仪。方法:对两种采用电化学传感器的便携式一氧化碳监测仪进行测试,以确定麻醉剂、气体样品流速和高浓度一氧化碳对其电化学传感器的影响。便携式一氧化碳监测仪暴露于0至500 ppm一氧化碳的气体混合物中,要么是70%的氧化亚氮,要么是1 MAC浓度的当代挥发性麻醉剂,要么是在氧气中反应的异氟烷或地氟烷(含有CO和CHF3)。将电化学传感器测得的CO值与同时获得的气相色谱(GC)测得的样品进行了比较。数据采用线性回归分析。结果:所有麻醉药物的便携式CO监测仪与GC的总体相关性r2值>0.98。隔离的样品产生测量的CO随时间呈指数衰减,而在连续流过传感器的过程中保持稳定的测量。增加流量导致CO读数升高。将CO传感器暴露在3000和19000 ppm的CO环境中,最大报告浓度约为1250 ppm,恢复时间较长。结论:隔离样品的测量浓度降低表明传感器破坏了样品,而测量值对流量的依赖表明了扩散限制。任何超过500ppm的值都必须假定为代表危险的CO浓度,因为这些监测器在非常高的CO浓度下的非线性响应。这些便携式电化学一氧化碳监测仪足以测量一氧化碳浓度高达500ppm的存在,典型的临床浓度的麻醉药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of an electrochemical carbon monoxide monitor in the presence of anesthetic gases.

Objective: The passage of volatile anesthetic agents through accidentally dried CO2 absorbents in anesthesia circuits can result in the chemical breakdown of anesthetics with production of greater than 10000 ppm carbon monoxide (CO). This study was designed to evaluate a portable CO monitor in the presence of volatile anesthetic agents.

Methods: Two portable CO monitors employing electrochemical sensors were tested to determine the effects of anesthetic agents, gas sample flow rates, and high CO concentrations on their electrochemical sensor. The portable CO monitors were exposed to gas mixtures of 0 to 500 ppm CO in either 70% nitrous oxide, 1 MAC concentrations of contemporary volatile anesthetics, or reacted isoflurane or desflurane (containing CO and CHF3) in oxygen. The CO measurements from the electrochemical sensors were compared to simultaneously obtained samples measured by gas chromatography (GC). Data were analyzed by linear regression.

Results: Overall correlation between the portable CO monitors and the GC resulted in an r2 value >0.98 for all anesthetic agents. Sequestered samples produced an exponential decay of measured CO with time, whereas stable measurements were maintained during continuous flow across the sensor. Increasing flow rates resulted in higher CO readings. Exposing the CO sensor to 3000 and 19000 ppm CO resulted in maximum reported concentrations of approximately 1250 ppm, with a prolonged recovery.

Conclusions: Decrease in measured concentration of the sequestered samples suggests destruction of the sample by the sensor, whereas a diffusion limitation is suggested by the dependency of measured value upon flow. Any value over 500 ppm must be assumed to represent dangerous concentrations of CO because of the non-linear response of these monitors at very high CO concentrations. These portable electrochemical CO monitors are adequate to measure CO concentrations up to 500 ppm in the presence of typical clinical concentrations of anesthetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thanks to reviewers Pulse oximetry. Abstracts of scientific papers third international symposium on computing in anesthesia Abstracts of scientific papers computers in anesthesia VI Monitoring in Anesthesia, Second Edition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1