S Hermouet, A E Niaussat, A Briec, D Pineau, N Robillard, R Bataille, N Milpied, J L Harousseau, B Mahé
{"title":"G-CSF动员白细胞分离产物纯化的CD34+细胞自体移植后血小板恢复分析。","authors":"S Hermouet, A E Niaussat, A Briec, D Pineau, N Robillard, R Bataille, N Milpied, J L Harousseau, B Mahé","doi":"10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied platelet recovery in relation to graft content in CFUs and CD34+ cells in 31 patients with multiple myeloma (21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10) receiving marrow-ablative therapy followed by autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products. Twelve patients had prolonged post-transplantation thrombopenia (> or = 14 days): their graft contents in CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E were significantly inferior to those of patients with rapid platelet recovery. Although numbers of infused CD34+ cells and CFU-GM or BFU-E were well correlated, the graft content in CD34+ cells was the only parameter predictive of platelet recovery (r = -0.38, p = 0.04), with a threshold of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. However, because rapid platelet reconstitution was obtained for 4 of 16 patients re-infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, we investigated whether the graft CFU-MK content might be a better predictor of platelet reconstitution than the CD34+ cell content. Eighteen CD34 grafts were studied for CFU-MK content: CD34 and CFU-MK contents were weakly correlated (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), but there was no correlation between numbers of infused CFU-MK and time to platelet recovery. We conclude that, for autologous CD34 grafts, CFU-MK assays, like CFU-GM or BFU-E assays, cannot be used to predict platelet recovery. A CD34+ cell content > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg remains the only reliable indicator of the platelet reconstitution capacity of a CD34 graft.</p>","PeriodicalId":73231,"journal":{"name":"Hematology and cell therapy","volume":"39 6","pages":"317-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of platelet recovery after autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products.\",\"authors\":\"S Hermouet, A E Niaussat, A Briec, D Pineau, N Robillard, R Bataille, N Milpied, J L Harousseau, B Mahé\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We studied platelet recovery in relation to graft content in CFUs and CD34+ cells in 31 patients with multiple myeloma (21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10) receiving marrow-ablative therapy followed by autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products. Twelve patients had prolonged post-transplantation thrombopenia (> or = 14 days): their graft contents in CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E were significantly inferior to those of patients with rapid platelet recovery. Although numbers of infused CD34+ cells and CFU-GM or BFU-E were well correlated, the graft content in CD34+ cells was the only parameter predictive of platelet recovery (r = -0.38, p = 0.04), with a threshold of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. However, because rapid platelet reconstitution was obtained for 4 of 16 patients re-infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, we investigated whether the graft CFU-MK content might be a better predictor of platelet reconstitution than the CD34+ cell content. Eighteen CD34 grafts were studied for CFU-MK content: CD34 and CFU-MK contents were weakly correlated (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), but there was no correlation between numbers of infused CFU-MK and time to platelet recovery. We conclude that, for autologous CD34 grafts, CFU-MK assays, like CFU-GM or BFU-E assays, cannot be used to predict platelet recovery. A CD34+ cell content > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg remains the only reliable indicator of the platelet reconstitution capacity of a CD34 graft.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology and cell therapy\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"317-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology and cell therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00282-997-0317-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
我们研究了31例接受骨髓消融治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(21例)或非霍奇金淋巴瘤(10例)患者的血小板恢复与移植物cfu和CD34+细胞含量的关系,然后用从白细胞分离产物中纯化的G-CSF动员CD34+细胞进行自体移植。12例移植后血小板减少时间延长(>或= 14天),移植后CD34+细胞、CFU-GM和BFU-E含量明显低于血小板快速恢复的患者。虽然输注CD34+细胞的数量与CFU-GM或BFU-E有良好的相关性,但CD34+细胞中的移植物含量是预测血小板恢复的唯一参数(r = -0.38, p = 0.04),阈值为2.5 × 10(6)个CD34+细胞/kg。然而,由于16例再次输注< 2.5 × 10(6)个CD34+细胞/kg的患者中有4例获得了快速血小板重建,我们研究了移植物CFU-MK含量是否比CD34+细胞含量更能预测血小板重建。对18例CD34移植物CFU-MK含量进行研究:CD34与CFU-MK含量呈弱相关(r = 0.52, p = 0.03),但CFU-MK输注数与血小板恢复时间无相关性。我们得出结论,对于自体CD34移植物,CFU-MK检测,如CFU-GM或BFU-E检测,不能用于预测血小板恢复。CD34+细胞含量>或= 2.5 × 10(6)/kg仍然是CD34移植物血小板重建能力的唯一可靠指标。
Analysis of platelet recovery after autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products.
We studied platelet recovery in relation to graft content in CFUs and CD34+ cells in 31 patients with multiple myeloma (21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10) receiving marrow-ablative therapy followed by autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products. Twelve patients had prolonged post-transplantation thrombopenia (> or = 14 days): their graft contents in CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E were significantly inferior to those of patients with rapid platelet recovery. Although numbers of infused CD34+ cells and CFU-GM or BFU-E were well correlated, the graft content in CD34+ cells was the only parameter predictive of platelet recovery (r = -0.38, p = 0.04), with a threshold of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. However, because rapid platelet reconstitution was obtained for 4 of 16 patients re-infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, we investigated whether the graft CFU-MK content might be a better predictor of platelet reconstitution than the CD34+ cell content. Eighteen CD34 grafts were studied for CFU-MK content: CD34 and CFU-MK contents were weakly correlated (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), but there was no correlation between numbers of infused CFU-MK and time to platelet recovery. We conclude that, for autologous CD34 grafts, CFU-MK assays, like CFU-GM or BFU-E assays, cannot be used to predict platelet recovery. A CD34+ cell content > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg remains the only reliable indicator of the platelet reconstitution capacity of a CD34 graft.