{"title":"温度和活动对黑腹果蝇成虫代谢率的影响","authors":"D. Berrigan , L. Partridge","doi":"10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We measured metabolic rates of adult male <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> allowed to evolve in the laboratory at 18 and 25°C and compared these with measurements of metabolic rates of flies collected along a latitudinal gradient in Australia. Metabolic rates of flies that had evolved in the laboratory at low temperature were 5–7% higher than those of flies allowed to evolve at high temperature. Metabolic rates of field collected increased with latitude when measured at 18°C but not at higher temperature (25°C) and were about 9% greater in high latitude (∼41′00) flies than low latitude (16′53) flies. Metabolic rate was strongly influenced by measurement temperature; estimated Q<sub>10</sub>s ranged from 1.79 to 2.5 for measurements made at 18 and 25°C. Metabolic rate scaled isometrically with body mass; the estimated slope of a ln-ln regression of metabolic rate and body mass was 1.03 ± 0.1. We used our measures of metabolic rate and activity to estimate the minimum cost of transport (MCOT) while walking. The estimates of MCOT have high standard errors (lab, 34.30 ± 14.2 ml O<sub>2</sub>/g/km; and field, 38.0 ± 17.0 ml O<sub>2</sub>/g/km); however, they differ by only 3–9% from predicted values based on allometric relationships reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10612,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology","volume":"118 4","pages":"Pages 1301-1307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3","citationCount":"112","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of temperature and activity on the metabolic rate of adult Drosophila melanogaster\",\"authors\":\"D. Berrigan , L. Partridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We measured metabolic rates of adult male <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> allowed to evolve in the laboratory at 18 and 25°C and compared these with measurements of metabolic rates of flies collected along a latitudinal gradient in Australia. Metabolic rates of flies that had evolved in the laboratory at low temperature were 5–7% higher than those of flies allowed to evolve at high temperature. Metabolic rates of field collected increased with latitude when measured at 18°C but not at higher temperature (25°C) and were about 9% greater in high latitude (∼41′00) flies than low latitude (16′53) flies. Metabolic rate was strongly influenced by measurement temperature; estimated Q<sub>10</sub>s ranged from 1.79 to 2.5 for measurements made at 18 and 25°C. Metabolic rate scaled isometrically with body mass; the estimated slope of a ln-ln regression of metabolic rate and body mass was 1.03 ± 0.1. We used our measures of metabolic rate and activity to estimate the minimum cost of transport (MCOT) while walking. The estimates of MCOT have high standard errors (lab, 34.30 ± 14.2 ml O<sub>2</sub>/g/km; and field, 38.0 ± 17.0 ml O<sub>2</sub>/g/km); however, they differ by only 3–9% from predicted values based on allometric relationships reported in the literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology\",\"volume\":\"118 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1301-1307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0300-9629(97)00030-3\",\"citationCount\":\"112\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300962997000303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300962997000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112
摘要
我们测量了在18°C和25°C的实验室中进化的成年雄性黑腹果蝇的代谢率,并将这些数据与在澳大利亚沿纬度梯度收集的苍蝇的代谢率进行了比较。在实验室低温下进化的果蝇的代谢率比在高温下进化的果蝇高5-7%。在18°C测量时,田间采集的代谢率随纬度增加而增加,但在更高温度(25°C)下没有增加,高纬度(~ 41′00)蝇的代谢率比低纬度(16′53)蝇高9%左右。代谢率受测量温度的影响较大;在18°C和25°C测量时,估计的q10范围为1.79至2.5。代谢率与体重成等距比例;代谢率和体重的估计ln-ln回归斜率为1.03±0.1。我们使用代谢率和活动量来估算步行时的最小运输成本(MCOT)。MCOT的估计值具有较高的标准误差(实验室为34.30±14.2 ml O2/g/km;现场:38.0±17.0 ml O2/g/km);然而,它们与基于文献中报道的异速生长关系的预测值仅相差3-9%。
Influence of temperature and activity on the metabolic rate of adult Drosophila melanogaster
We measured metabolic rates of adult male Drosophila melanogaster allowed to evolve in the laboratory at 18 and 25°C and compared these with measurements of metabolic rates of flies collected along a latitudinal gradient in Australia. Metabolic rates of flies that had evolved in the laboratory at low temperature were 5–7% higher than those of flies allowed to evolve at high temperature. Metabolic rates of field collected increased with latitude when measured at 18°C but not at higher temperature (25°C) and were about 9% greater in high latitude (∼41′00) flies than low latitude (16′53) flies. Metabolic rate was strongly influenced by measurement temperature; estimated Q10s ranged from 1.79 to 2.5 for measurements made at 18 and 25°C. Metabolic rate scaled isometrically with body mass; the estimated slope of a ln-ln regression of metabolic rate and body mass was 1.03 ± 0.1. We used our measures of metabolic rate and activity to estimate the minimum cost of transport (MCOT) while walking. The estimates of MCOT have high standard errors (lab, 34.30 ± 14.2 ml O2/g/km; and field, 38.0 ± 17.0 ml O2/g/km); however, they differ by only 3–9% from predicted values based on allometric relationships reported in the literature.