R Villet, E Mandron, D Salet-Lizee, M van den Akker, P Gadonneix, M Zafiropulo
{"title":"【经腹入路促进固定及膀胱前下假体置入联合耻骨后阴道峡破术治疗泌尿生殖系统脱垂:104例解剖和功能结果】。","authors":"R Villet, E Mandron, D Salet-Lizee, M van den Akker, P Gadonneix, M Zafiropulo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A homogeneous series of 104 patients with genito-urinary prolapse or urinary incontinence is reported. Surgical treatment combined promotofixation with (n = 45) or without (n = 59) subtotal hysterectomy, retropubic colpopexia and in certain cases posterior colpoperineorraphia with myorraphia of the levator ani (n = 28). Anatomic results were excellent for bladder and uterine ptosis. Moderate results were obtained for rectoceles and procedures involving the posterior perineum. A rectovaginal prosthesis or complete repair of the rectovaginal wall appeared to be required to improve results for rectoceles. Urine function was good for urinary incontinence: 91% success. Results depended on the pressure of the uretral closure. A complete urodynamic work-up is required prior to surgery in case of sphincter failure. Poor results were also related to excessive posterior traction which can open the cervico-uretral angle. Treatment of genito-urinary prolapse with promotofixation in combination with retropubic colpopexia is a reliable reproducible technique which gives excellent long-term results if excessive promontory traction is avoided and if, in certain cases, the rectovaginal wall is repaired or a prosthesis implanted when maximum uretral closure pressure is weak.</p>","PeriodicalId":10182,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","volume":"122 5-6","pages":"353-8; discussion 358-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Surgical treatment of genito-urinary prolapse by abdominal approach with promotofixation and setting of an anterior subvesical prosthesis combined with retropubic colpopexia: anatomical and functional results in 104 patients].\",\"authors\":\"R Villet, E Mandron, D Salet-Lizee, M van den Akker, P Gadonneix, M Zafiropulo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A homogeneous series of 104 patients with genito-urinary prolapse or urinary incontinence is reported. Surgical treatment combined promotofixation with (n = 45) or without (n = 59) subtotal hysterectomy, retropubic colpopexia and in certain cases posterior colpoperineorraphia with myorraphia of the levator ani (n = 28). Anatomic results were excellent for bladder and uterine ptosis. Moderate results were obtained for rectoceles and procedures involving the posterior perineum. A rectovaginal prosthesis or complete repair of the rectovaginal wall appeared to be required to improve results for rectoceles. Urine function was good for urinary incontinence: 91% success. Results depended on the pressure of the uretral closure. A complete urodynamic work-up is required prior to surgery in case of sphincter failure. Poor results were also related to excessive posterior traction which can open the cervico-uretral angle. Treatment of genito-urinary prolapse with promotofixation in combination with retropubic colpopexia is a reliable reproducible technique which gives excellent long-term results if excessive promontory traction is avoided and if, in certain cases, the rectovaginal wall is repaired or a prosthesis implanted when maximum uretral closure pressure is weak.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"122 5-6\",\"pages\":\"353-8; discussion 358-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Surgical treatment of genito-urinary prolapse by abdominal approach with promotofixation and setting of an anterior subvesical prosthesis combined with retropubic colpopexia: anatomical and functional results in 104 patients].
A homogeneous series of 104 patients with genito-urinary prolapse or urinary incontinence is reported. Surgical treatment combined promotofixation with (n = 45) or without (n = 59) subtotal hysterectomy, retropubic colpopexia and in certain cases posterior colpoperineorraphia with myorraphia of the levator ani (n = 28). Anatomic results were excellent for bladder and uterine ptosis. Moderate results were obtained for rectoceles and procedures involving the posterior perineum. A rectovaginal prosthesis or complete repair of the rectovaginal wall appeared to be required to improve results for rectoceles. Urine function was good for urinary incontinence: 91% success. Results depended on the pressure of the uretral closure. A complete urodynamic work-up is required prior to surgery in case of sphincter failure. Poor results were also related to excessive posterior traction which can open the cervico-uretral angle. Treatment of genito-urinary prolapse with promotofixation in combination with retropubic colpopexia is a reliable reproducible technique which gives excellent long-term results if excessive promontory traction is avoided and if, in certain cases, the rectovaginal wall is repaired or a prosthesis implanted when maximum uretral closure pressure is weak.