{"title":"大休斯顿地区办公室氟化物的使用情况。","authors":"J T Chan, D P Warren, H A Henson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the types of fluorides and techniques used for the application of in-office fluorides in the Houston area. A telephone survey was conducted using a stratified random sample of 262 dentists. Approximately 39% of the offices contacted chose to respond to the survey. Only one of the 101 dental offices responding was using an ADA approved professional fluoride product and technique: 1.23% APF for 4 minutes. While 41.6% or 42 of the respondents were using 1.23% APF, they were administering the fluoride for 2 minutes or less with the majority (38 out of 42) administering for only 1 minute. The second most number of respondents (35.6%) reported using a dual rinse type product consisting of 0.31% APF and 1.64% SnF2. Of the 101 respondents, 12.8% reported the use of sodium fluoride gels and rinses. Of these 13 respondents, 9 were using 2.0% NaF but for less than the recommended 4 minute application time. The other 4 were using 2.0% rinse which is more appropriate as a weekly-use rinse. The remaining respondents (9.8%) reported the use of a stannous fluoride containing less fluoride than the approved 8.0%. Of these 10 respondents, 3 were using 0.63% SnF2 and 7 were using 0.4% SnF2. One office reported the use of a non-fluoride containing mouthrinse used as an in-office fluoride treatment. This response is not included in the data as it does not qualify as a type of fluoride product.</p>","PeriodicalId":77430,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society","volume":"68 3","pages":"22-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of in-office fluorides in the Greater Houston area.\",\"authors\":\"J T Chan, D P Warren, H A Henson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the types of fluorides and techniques used for the application of in-office fluorides in the Houston area. A telephone survey was conducted using a stratified random sample of 262 dentists. Approximately 39% of the offices contacted chose to respond to the survey. Only one of the 101 dental offices responding was using an ADA approved professional fluoride product and technique: 1.23% APF for 4 minutes. While 41.6% or 42 of the respondents were using 1.23% APF, they were administering the fluoride for 2 minutes or less with the majority (38 out of 42) administering for only 1 minute. The second most number of respondents (35.6%) reported using a dual rinse type product consisting of 0.31% APF and 1.64% SnF2. Of the 101 respondents, 12.8% reported the use of sodium fluoride gels and rinses. Of these 13 respondents, 9 were using 2.0% NaF but for less than the recommended 4 minute application time. The other 4 were using 2.0% rinse which is more appropriate as a weekly-use rinse. The remaining respondents (9.8%) reported the use of a stannous fluoride containing less fluoride than the approved 8.0%. Of these 10 respondents, 3 were using 0.63% SnF2 and 7 were using 0.4% SnF2. One office reported the use of a non-fluoride containing mouthrinse used as an in-office fluoride treatment. This response is not included in the data as it does not qualify as a type of fluoride product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"22-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of in-office fluorides in the Greater Houston area.
The purpose of this study was to determine the types of fluorides and techniques used for the application of in-office fluorides in the Houston area. A telephone survey was conducted using a stratified random sample of 262 dentists. Approximately 39% of the offices contacted chose to respond to the survey. Only one of the 101 dental offices responding was using an ADA approved professional fluoride product and technique: 1.23% APF for 4 minutes. While 41.6% or 42 of the respondents were using 1.23% APF, they were administering the fluoride for 2 minutes or less with the majority (38 out of 42) administering for only 1 minute. The second most number of respondents (35.6%) reported using a dual rinse type product consisting of 0.31% APF and 1.64% SnF2. Of the 101 respondents, 12.8% reported the use of sodium fluoride gels and rinses. Of these 13 respondents, 9 were using 2.0% NaF but for less than the recommended 4 minute application time. The other 4 were using 2.0% rinse which is more appropriate as a weekly-use rinse. The remaining respondents (9.8%) reported the use of a stannous fluoride containing less fluoride than the approved 8.0%. Of these 10 respondents, 3 were using 0.63% SnF2 and 7 were using 0.4% SnF2. One office reported the use of a non-fluoride containing mouthrinse used as an in-office fluoride treatment. This response is not included in the data as it does not qualify as a type of fluoride product.