[临床实践中新型抗抑郁药的使用模式]。

A L Montejo, I Gilaberte, C Fombellida, T R Hylan, J A Sacristán
{"title":"[临床实践中新型抗抑郁药的使用模式]。","authors":"A L Montejo,&nbsp;I Gilaberte,&nbsp;C Fombellida,&nbsp;T R Hylan,&nbsp;J A Sacristán","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data from naturalistic studies have reported differences in the clinical use of antidepressants referring to the need for adjusting doses, treatment duration, tolerability and use of concomitant medication. These differences could be considered as an indicator of the effectiveness of antidepressants in clinical practice settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is a naturalistic, retrospective, observational study which objective is to evaluate and compare the pattern of antidepressant use (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine) and to establish if there is a relation between the different pattern of use and the effectiveness of them.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine with a follow-up period of 6 months was used. Information about clinical characteristics of patients and antidepressant pattern of use were collected. Pattern of antidepressant use were defined as: \"initial doses\", \"upward dose titration\", \"augmentation strategy\", \"switching\" and \"early interruption of treatment\". The efficacy of the therapy was assessed by the CGI-improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fluoxetine was the antidepressant more associated with a statistical significance (p = 0.001) to an stable pattern of use (initial doses without upward dose titration, switching or augmentation). After controlling for other observed baseline characteristics, patients who remained on their initial antidepressant therapy, with a stable pattern of use were 1.61 times more likely than patients who had an adjustment to therapy to experience a treatment response. Patients who initiated treatment with sertraline or venlafaxine were 2.155 and 4.831 times less likely, respectively, to experience a response relative to patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need to upward dose titration, switching or augmentation in the treatment could be indicated a worse therapeutic control of the symptoms. Patients treated with fluoxetine are in a stable pattern of use more likely than patients in the other antidepressants, this fact is related with better global therapeutic results.</p>","PeriodicalId":75429,"journal":{"name":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","volume":"26 2","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pattern of usage of new antidepressants in clinical practice].\",\"authors\":\"A L Montejo,&nbsp;I Gilaberte,&nbsp;C Fombellida,&nbsp;T R Hylan,&nbsp;J A Sacristán\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data from naturalistic studies have reported differences in the clinical use of antidepressants referring to the need for adjusting doses, treatment duration, tolerability and use of concomitant medication. These differences could be considered as an indicator of the effectiveness of antidepressants in clinical practice settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It is a naturalistic, retrospective, observational study which objective is to evaluate and compare the pattern of antidepressant use (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine) and to establish if there is a relation between the different pattern of use and the effectiveness of them.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine with a follow-up period of 6 months was used. Information about clinical characteristics of patients and antidepressant pattern of use were collected. Pattern of antidepressant use were defined as: \\\"initial doses\\\", \\\"upward dose titration\\\", \\\"augmentation strategy\\\", \\\"switching\\\" and \\\"early interruption of treatment\\\". The efficacy of the therapy was assessed by the CGI-improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fluoxetine was the antidepressant more associated with a statistical significance (p = 0.001) to an stable pattern of use (initial doses without upward dose titration, switching or augmentation). After controlling for other observed baseline characteristics, patients who remained on their initial antidepressant therapy, with a stable pattern of use were 1.61 times more likely than patients who had an adjustment to therapy to experience a treatment response. Patients who initiated treatment with sertraline or venlafaxine were 2.155 and 4.831 times less likely, respectively, to experience a response relative to patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need to upward dose titration, switching or augmentation in the treatment could be indicated a worse therapeutic control of the symptoms. Patients treated with fluoxetine are in a stable pattern of use more likely than patients in the other antidepressants, this fact is related with better global therapeutic results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"75-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas luso-espanolas de neurologia, psiquiatria y ciencias afines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自自然主义研究的数据报告了临床使用抗抑郁药的差异,包括调整剂量、治疗持续时间、耐受性和使用伴随药物的需要。这些差异可以被认为是抗抑郁药在临床实践中有效性的一个指标。目的:这是一项自然的、回顾性的、观察性的研究,目的是评价和比较抗抑郁药的使用模式(氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林、文拉法辛),并确定不同的使用模式与它们的有效性之间是否存在关系。资料和方法:回顾性分析了开始使用氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林或文拉法辛治疗的患者,随访时间为6个月。收集患者的临床特征和抗抑郁药的使用方式。抗抑郁药的使用模式定义为:“初始剂量”、“剂量递增”、“强化策略”、“切换”和“早期中断治疗”。以颅脑损伤改善程度评价治疗效果。结果:氟西汀是抗抑郁药,与稳定的使用模式(初始剂量没有上升剂量滴定、切换或增加)有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。在控制了其他观察到的基线特征后,继续接受初始抗抑郁药治疗并稳定使用的患者比调整治疗的患者出现治疗反应的可能性高1.61倍。与开始使用氟西汀治疗的患者相比,开始使用舍曲林或文拉法辛治疗的患者分别比开始使用氟西汀治疗的患者出现反应的可能性低2.155和4.831倍。结论:在治疗中需要增加剂量滴定、转换或增加剂量可能表明症状的治疗控制较差。使用氟西汀治疗的患者比使用其他抗抑郁药的患者更有可能处于稳定的使用模式,这一事实与更好的整体治疗效果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Pattern of usage of new antidepressants in clinical practice].

Introduction: Data from naturalistic studies have reported differences in the clinical use of antidepressants referring to the need for adjusting doses, treatment duration, tolerability and use of concomitant medication. These differences could be considered as an indicator of the effectiveness of antidepressants in clinical practice settings.

Objectives: It is a naturalistic, retrospective, observational study which objective is to evaluate and compare the pattern of antidepressant use (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine) and to establish if there is a relation between the different pattern of use and the effectiveness of them.

Data and methods: A retrospective dataset of patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine with a follow-up period of 6 months was used. Information about clinical characteristics of patients and antidepressant pattern of use were collected. Pattern of antidepressant use were defined as: "initial doses", "upward dose titration", "augmentation strategy", "switching" and "early interruption of treatment". The efficacy of the therapy was assessed by the CGI-improvement.

Results: Fluoxetine was the antidepressant more associated with a statistical significance (p = 0.001) to an stable pattern of use (initial doses without upward dose titration, switching or augmentation). After controlling for other observed baseline characteristics, patients who remained on their initial antidepressant therapy, with a stable pattern of use were 1.61 times more likely than patients who had an adjustment to therapy to experience a treatment response. Patients who initiated treatment with sertraline or venlafaxine were 2.155 and 4.831 times less likely, respectively, to experience a response relative to patients who initiated therapy on fluoxetine.

Conclusions: The need to upward dose titration, switching or augmentation in the treatment could be indicated a worse therapeutic control of the symptoms. Patients treated with fluoxetine are in a stable pattern of use more likely than patients in the other antidepressants, this fact is related with better global therapeutic results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Benzodiazepines in the treatment of schizophrenia: a review]. [Psychiatric symptoms in Cushing syndrome: a clinical case]. [Apolipoproteins and cognitive deterioration]. [Normative data for the neuropsychological evaluation of intravenous drug users]. [Importance of the early diagnosis of malignant neuroleptic syndrome: report of 2 cases].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1