[完全根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结阳性(pT1至4期,N1至3期,M0期,D1期)]。

Acta urologica Belgica Pub Date : 1998-03-01
A Feyaerts, L Stainier, M C Nollevaux, P De Groote, F Lorge, R Opsomer, F X Wese, J P Cosyns, P Van Cangh
{"title":"[完全根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结阳性(pT1至4期,N1至3期,M0期,D1期)]。","authors":"A Feyaerts,&nbsp;L Stainier,&nbsp;M C Nollevaux,&nbsp;P De Groote,&nbsp;F Lorge,&nbsp;R Opsomer,&nbsp;F X Wese,&nbsp;J P Cosyns,&nbsp;P Van Cangh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lymph node metastases are rarely detected during radical prostatectomy (55/647 patients in our series or 8.5%) and several authors consider that lymphadenectomy is unnecessary in most cases. Criteria based on clinical stage, PSA and tumor grade have been elaborated in order to avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in a low risk population. It is commonly admitted that patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, a PSA level < 10 ng/ml, and a Gleason score < 7 could be spared a pelvic lymphadenectomy. In our series, these patients account for 12% of positive nodes. The best treatment for prostate cancer patients with a nodal disease is controversial. We compare the evolution of two groups of patients: radical prostatectomy alone or combined with an immediate adjuvant hormonal treatment. We observe a difference between the two groups for biological progression (PSA failure) but not yet for clinical progression nor for survival as our mean follow-up in only 6 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":75424,"journal":{"name":"Acta urologica Belgica","volume":"66 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Complete radical prostatectomy and positive lymph nodes (stages pT1 to 4, N1 to 3, M0, D1)].\",\"authors\":\"A Feyaerts,&nbsp;L Stainier,&nbsp;M C Nollevaux,&nbsp;P De Groote,&nbsp;F Lorge,&nbsp;R Opsomer,&nbsp;F X Wese,&nbsp;J P Cosyns,&nbsp;P Van Cangh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lymph node metastases are rarely detected during radical prostatectomy (55/647 patients in our series or 8.5%) and several authors consider that lymphadenectomy is unnecessary in most cases. Criteria based on clinical stage, PSA and tumor grade have been elaborated in order to avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in a low risk population. It is commonly admitted that patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, a PSA level < 10 ng/ml, and a Gleason score < 7 could be spared a pelvic lymphadenectomy. In our series, these patients account for 12% of positive nodes. The best treatment for prostate cancer patients with a nodal disease is controversial. We compare the evolution of two groups of patients: radical prostatectomy alone or combined with an immediate adjuvant hormonal treatment. We observe a difference between the two groups for biological progression (PSA failure) but not yet for clinical progression nor for survival as our mean follow-up in only 6 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta urologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta urologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta urologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在根治性前列腺切除术中很少发现淋巴结转移(在我们的研究中,647例患者中有55例或8.5%),一些作者认为在大多数情况下,淋巴结切除术是不必要的。为了避免低危人群的盆腔淋巴结清扫,我们制定了基于临床分期、PSA和肿瘤分级的标准。临床局限性前列腺癌、PSA水平< 10 ng/ml、Gleason评分< 7的患者可以免行盆腔淋巴结切除术。在我们的研究中,这些患者占阳性淋巴结的12%。对于伴有淋巴结病变的前列腺癌患者的最佳治疗方法存在争议。我们比较两组患者的发展:单独根治性前列腺切除术或联合立即辅助激素治疗。我们观察到两组在生物学进展(PSA失败)方面存在差异,但在临床进展和生存方面尚未发现差异,我们的平均随访时间仅为6年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Complete radical prostatectomy and positive lymph nodes (stages pT1 to 4, N1 to 3, M0, D1)].

Lymph node metastases are rarely detected during radical prostatectomy (55/647 patients in our series or 8.5%) and several authors consider that lymphadenectomy is unnecessary in most cases. Criteria based on clinical stage, PSA and tumor grade have been elaborated in order to avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in a low risk population. It is commonly admitted that patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, a PSA level < 10 ng/ml, and a Gleason score < 7 could be spared a pelvic lymphadenectomy. In our series, these patients account for 12% of positive nodes. The best treatment for prostate cancer patients with a nodal disease is controversial. We compare the evolution of two groups of patients: radical prostatectomy alone or combined with an immediate adjuvant hormonal treatment. We observe a difference between the two groups for biological progression (PSA failure) but not yet for clinical progression nor for survival as our mean follow-up in only 6 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Duplication of urethra Partial Cystectomy Non-Neurogenic Neurogenic Bladder [Urinary incontinence in women]. [Ureaplasma urealyticum infections].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1