{"title":"ISDN带宽对产科超声远程医疗传输图像质量的影响","authors":"F D Malone, A Athanassiou, J Nores, M E D'Alton","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate objectively the effect of different bandwidths on the ability to interpret obstetric ultrasound scans transmitted live over a commercial telephone network.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An integrated services digital network (ISDN) was established from three satellite offices to our central prenatal diagnostic center. In the first half of the study, the network was based on four ISDN channels transmitting at a bandwidth of 256 kbits per second (kbps), while in the second half of the study, this was increased to six ISDN channels transmitting at 384 kbps. A physician trained in obstetric ultrasonography provided an interpretation of fetal anatomy using a live, real-time telemedicine link. A scoring system consisting of 33 anatomic items was used to evaluate image quality objectively. The number of transmissions complicated by motion artifact was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients had a fetal anatomy survey performed using the 256 kbps system, and these interpretations were compared with those from another group of 100 patients who were examined using the 384 kbps system. Although the visibility of the 33 anatomic items was similar using the two systems, significantly more examinations at 256 kbps were complicated by motion artifact (12% vs. 3%; P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote sonographic viewing of fetal anatomy was adequate using both 256 and 384 kbps systems, although motion artifact was significantly more likely to occur using the slower system. This problem may affect the ability of the lower-bandwidth system to allow optimal detection when fetal anomalies are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 2","pages":"161-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ISDN bandwidth on image quality for telemedicine transmission of obstetric ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"F D Malone, A Athanassiou, J Nores, M E D'Alton\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate objectively the effect of different bandwidths on the ability to interpret obstetric ultrasound scans transmitted live over a commercial telephone network.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An integrated services digital network (ISDN) was established from three satellite offices to our central prenatal diagnostic center. In the first half of the study, the network was based on four ISDN channels transmitting at a bandwidth of 256 kbits per second (kbps), while in the second half of the study, this was increased to six ISDN channels transmitting at 384 kbps. A physician trained in obstetric ultrasonography provided an interpretation of fetal anatomy using a live, real-time telemedicine link. A scoring system consisting of 33 anatomic items was used to evaluate image quality objectively. The number of transmissions complicated by motion artifact was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients had a fetal anatomy survey performed using the 256 kbps system, and these interpretations were compared with those from another group of 100 patients who were examined using the 384 kbps system. Although the visibility of the 33 anatomic items was similar using the two systems, significantly more examinations at 256 kbps were complicated by motion artifact (12% vs. 3%; P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote sonographic viewing of fetal anatomy was adequate using both 256 and 384 kbps systems, although motion artifact was significantly more likely to occur using the slower system. This problem may affect the ability of the lower-bandwidth system to allow optimal detection when fetal anomalies are present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"161-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
摘要
目的:客观评价不同带宽对商业电话网络产科超声扫描实时传输能力的影响。材料和方法:从三个卫星办公室到我们的中心产前诊断中心建立了综合服务数字网络(ISDN)。在研究的前半部分,网络基于4个ISDN通道,传输带宽为256 kb / s (kbps),而在研究的后半段,这一数字增加到6个ISDN通道,传输带宽为384 kb / s。一位接受过产科超声检查培训的医生通过实时远程医疗链接对胎儿解剖进行了解释。采用由33个解剖项目组成的评分系统对图像质量进行客观评价。同时记录了运动伪影导致的传输次数。结果:100名患者使用256 kbps系统进行了胎儿解剖调查,并将这些解释与另一组使用384 kbps系统检查的100名患者进行了比较。尽管两种系统对33个解剖项目的可见性是相似的,但在256 kbps下,明显更多的检查因运动伪影而复杂化(12% vs. 3%;P = 0.02)。结论:使用256和384 kbps系统时,胎儿解剖的远程超声观察是足够的,尽管使用较慢的系统时,运动伪影明显更容易发生。这个问题可能会影响低带宽系统的能力,以便在胎儿异常时进行最佳检测。
Effect of ISDN bandwidth on image quality for telemedicine transmission of obstetric ultrasonography.
Objective: To evaluate objectively the effect of different bandwidths on the ability to interpret obstetric ultrasound scans transmitted live over a commercial telephone network.
Materials and methods: An integrated services digital network (ISDN) was established from three satellite offices to our central prenatal diagnostic center. In the first half of the study, the network was based on four ISDN channels transmitting at a bandwidth of 256 kbits per second (kbps), while in the second half of the study, this was increased to six ISDN channels transmitting at 384 kbps. A physician trained in obstetric ultrasonography provided an interpretation of fetal anatomy using a live, real-time telemedicine link. A scoring system consisting of 33 anatomic items was used to evaluate image quality objectively. The number of transmissions complicated by motion artifact was also recorded.
Results: One hundred patients had a fetal anatomy survey performed using the 256 kbps system, and these interpretations were compared with those from another group of 100 patients who were examined using the 384 kbps system. Although the visibility of the 33 anatomic items was similar using the two systems, significantly more examinations at 256 kbps were complicated by motion artifact (12% vs. 3%; P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Remote sonographic viewing of fetal anatomy was adequate using both 256 and 384 kbps systems, although motion artifact was significantly more likely to occur using the slower system. This problem may affect the ability of the lower-bandwidth system to allow optimal detection when fetal anomalies are present.