癫痫患者开车时的道德困境。

J Ozuna
{"title":"癫痫患者开车时的道德困境。","authors":"J Ozuna","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concern about driving safety in people with epilepsy has been present since the automobile became a widely used source of transportation (Siegel, 1988). Unfortunately, we still do not have adequate means to determine who can and cannot drive. Clinicians must use their best medical judgment to make these determinations. They then must consider the aspects of their state's driving laws and legal consequences of their judgments. In the 44 states that do not require clinician reporting of seizures, they must deliberate about breaching or maintaining the confidentiality of patients with uncontrolled seizures who continue to drive. In making this deliberation they should consider both the probability and magnitude of harm posed by continued driving of an individual patient. Judgments to breach confidentiality should include assessment of risks and benefits to the patient and to society by taking such action. Ultimately, each patient must be judged individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":79396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nursing practice in epilepsy","volume":"5 1","pages":"7-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical dilemmas in people with epilepsy who drive.\",\"authors\":\"J Ozuna\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concern about driving safety in people with epilepsy has been present since the automobile became a widely used source of transportation (Siegel, 1988). Unfortunately, we still do not have adequate means to determine who can and cannot drive. Clinicians must use their best medical judgment to make these determinations. They then must consider the aspects of their state's driving laws and legal consequences of their judgments. In the 44 states that do not require clinician reporting of seizures, they must deliberate about breaching or maintaining the confidentiality of patients with uncontrolled seizures who continue to drive. In making this deliberation they should consider both the probability and magnitude of harm posed by continued driving of an individual patient. Judgments to breach confidentiality should include assessment of risks and benefits to the patient and to society by taking such action. Ultimately, each patient must be judged individually.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nursing practice in epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"7-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nursing practice in epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nursing practice in epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从汽车成为一种广泛使用的交通工具以来,人们就开始关注癫痫患者的驾驶安全问题(Siegel, 1988)。不幸的是,我们仍然没有足够的手段来决定谁能开车,谁不能开车。临床医生必须使用他们最好的医学判断来做出这些决定。然后,他们必须考虑他们所在州的驾驶法律以及他们的判决的法律后果。在44个不要求临床医生报告癫痫发作的州中,他们必须慎重考虑是否会违反或维护癫痫发作不受控制的患者继续开车的机密。在进行这种审议时,他们应该考虑个别病人继续驾驶所造成的伤害的可能性和程度。对违反保密的判断应包括对采取这种行动对患者和社会的风险和利益的评估。最终,每个病人都必须单独判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical dilemmas in people with epilepsy who drive.

Concern about driving safety in people with epilepsy has been present since the automobile became a widely used source of transportation (Siegel, 1988). Unfortunately, we still do not have adequate means to determine who can and cannot drive. Clinicians must use their best medical judgment to make these determinations. They then must consider the aspects of their state's driving laws and legal consequences of their judgments. In the 44 states that do not require clinician reporting of seizures, they must deliberate about breaching or maintaining the confidentiality of patients with uncontrolled seizures who continue to drive. In making this deliberation they should consider both the probability and magnitude of harm posed by continued driving of an individual patient. Judgments to breach confidentiality should include assessment of risks and benefits to the patient and to society by taking such action. Ultimately, each patient must be judged individually.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy: what people with epilepsy and their families need to know. Ethical dilemmas in people with epilepsy who drive. Preventing accidental injury in people with epilepsy. Living safely with seizures: assistive technology, rehabilitation technology, and resources. Pregnancy and related issues for women with epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1