保健领域的远程学习:加拿大的观点。

P A Jennett, B J Hunter, J P Husack
{"title":"保健领域的远程学习:加拿大的观点。","authors":"P A Jennett,&nbsp;B J Hunter,&nbsp;J P Husack","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project identified telelearning projects associated with the 13 established Canadian telehealth centers in order to describe the nature of their activities, outline enablers and barriers to these activities, and present key action plans to move the Canadian agenda on telelearning in health forward.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected by a one-page questionnaire sent to the Canadian telehealth centers. Recipients were asked to identify current partners in such activities and to indicate if such partners should complete a separate questionnaire. Forty-nine questionnaires were distributed. Reported enablers, barriers, and action plans were placed in categories and analyzed. Data from 37 questionnaires, referencing 101 projects, formed the basis of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half of the telelearning programs were developed for health providers, approximately one third for undergraduate or graduate students, and a small percentage for patients or the private sector. The most frequently used communication mode was two-way audio/video conferencing. Enabling conditions were grouped into four categories: Canada as a country, timing, infrastructure, and collaboration and support. Five categories of barriers were cited: lack of sustainable funding, insufficient infrastructure and resources for sustainable programs, absence of the required culture change, lack of standardization and defined policies, and unavailability of valid and reliable evaluation frameworks. Eight broad constructive action steps were suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reported enablers can create momentum to carry telelearning into a position of prominence. The Canadian telehealth community recommends action steps that could facilitate the removal of barriers and maximize current opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 3","pages":"237-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telelearning in health: a Canadian perspective.\",\"authors\":\"P A Jennett,&nbsp;B J Hunter,&nbsp;J P Husack\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project identified telelearning projects associated with the 13 established Canadian telehealth centers in order to describe the nature of their activities, outline enablers and barriers to these activities, and present key action plans to move the Canadian agenda on telelearning in health forward.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected by a one-page questionnaire sent to the Canadian telehealth centers. Recipients were asked to identify current partners in such activities and to indicate if such partners should complete a separate questionnaire. Forty-nine questionnaires were distributed. Reported enablers, barriers, and action plans were placed in categories and analyzed. Data from 37 questionnaires, referencing 101 projects, formed the basis of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half of the telelearning programs were developed for health providers, approximately one third for undergraduate or graduate students, and a small percentage for patients or the private sector. The most frequently used communication mode was two-way audio/video conferencing. Enabling conditions were grouped into four categories: Canada as a country, timing, infrastructure, and collaboration and support. Five categories of barriers were cited: lack of sustainable funding, insufficient infrastructure and resources for sustainable programs, absence of the required culture change, lack of standardization and defined policies, and unavailability of valid and reliable evaluation frameworks. Eight broad constructive action steps were suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reported enablers can create momentum to carry telelearning into a position of prominence. The Canadian telehealth community recommends action steps that could facilitate the removal of barriers and maximize current opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"237-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目标:本项目确定了与13个已建立的加拿大远程保健中心有关的远程学习项目,以描述其活动的性质,概述这些活动的促成因素和障碍,并提出推动加拿大保健领域远程学习议程的关键行动计划。材料和方法:通过发给加拿大远程保健中心的一页调查问卷收集数据。请受助人指出目前参与这些活动的伙伴,并指出这些伙伴是否应单独填写一份调查表。发放了49份问卷。报告的促成因素、障碍和行动计划被分类并进行分析。来自37份问卷的数据,涉及101个项目,构成了分析的基础。结果:超过一半的远程学习方案是为卫生保健提供者开发的,大约三分之一是为本科生或研究生开发的,一小部分是为患者或私营部门开发的。最常用的通信方式是双向音频/视频会议。有利条件分为四类:加拿大作为一个国家、时机、基础设施、合作和支持。他们列举了五类障碍:缺乏可持续资金、可持续项目的基础设施和资源不足、缺乏必要的文化变革、缺乏标准化和明确的政策,以及缺乏有效和可靠的评估框架。会议提出了八项广泛的建设性行动步骤。结论:报告的推动者可以创造动力,使远程学习成为一个突出的位置。加拿大远程保健界建议采取行动步骤,以促进消除障碍和最大限度地利用目前的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telelearning in health: a Canadian perspective.

Objective: This project identified telelearning projects associated with the 13 established Canadian telehealth centers in order to describe the nature of their activities, outline enablers and barriers to these activities, and present key action plans to move the Canadian agenda on telelearning in health forward.

Materials and methods: Data were collected by a one-page questionnaire sent to the Canadian telehealth centers. Recipients were asked to identify current partners in such activities and to indicate if such partners should complete a separate questionnaire. Forty-nine questionnaires were distributed. Reported enablers, barriers, and action plans were placed in categories and analyzed. Data from 37 questionnaires, referencing 101 projects, formed the basis of the analysis.

Results: More than half of the telelearning programs were developed for health providers, approximately one third for undergraduate or graduate students, and a small percentage for patients or the private sector. The most frequently used communication mode was two-way audio/video conferencing. Enabling conditions were grouped into four categories: Canada as a country, timing, infrastructure, and collaboration and support. Five categories of barriers were cited: lack of sustainable funding, insufficient infrastructure and resources for sustainable programs, absence of the required culture change, lack of standardization and defined policies, and unavailability of valid and reliable evaluation frameworks. Eight broad constructive action steps were suggested.

Conclusions: The reported enablers can create momentum to carry telelearning into a position of prominence. The Canadian telehealth community recommends action steps that could facilitate the removal of barriers and maximize current opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Abstract from the American Telemedicine Association's Fifth Annual Meeting May 21-24, 2000, Phoenix, Arizona. Behavioral Telemedicine: A New Approach to the Continuous Nonintrusive Monitoring of Activities of Daily Living Specialist–Primary Care Provider–Patient Communication in Telemedical Consultations Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1