慢性髓性白血病的微小残留病。

Hematology and cell therapy Pub Date : 1998-10-01
N C Cross
{"title":"慢性髓性白血病的微小残留病。","authors":"N C Cross","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The principle aim of residual disease analysis in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is to gauge patient response to treatment and, in patients after allogeneic BMT, to enable early diagnosis of relapse. RT-PCR is by far the most sensitive assay to detect residual disease in CML and can enable a single leukaemia cell to be detected in a background of 10(5)-10(6) normal cells. This is approximately 1000 x greater than the routine detection limit of the other methods. After allogeneic BMT, many CML patients are BCR-ABL positive for prolonged periods of time without subsequently relapsing. Thus the simple presence or absence of residual BCR-ABL transcripts in patients' leukocytes is of little value in the management of individual cases. Quantitative PCR techniques can distinguish between those PCR positive patients who have low or falling BCR-ABL levels on sequential analysis from those who have levels that are increasing. Provided assays are performed frequently enough, rising or persistently high numbers of BCR-ABL transcripts can be detected prior to frank relapse and this information may be used for early therapeutic intervention. Most patients who respond to treatment for relapse by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) achieve durable molecular remission. Quantitative PCR is also useful to gauge the response of CML patients to IFN-alpha. We have found that the great majority of patients in complete cytogenetic remission after treatment with IFN-alpha remain PCR positive and harbour a minority population of BCR-ABL positive myeloid precursor cells. It is unlikely therefore this treatment modality completely eliminates the disease in any patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":73231,"journal":{"name":"Hematology and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"N C Cross\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The principle aim of residual disease analysis in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is to gauge patient response to treatment and, in patients after allogeneic BMT, to enable early diagnosis of relapse. RT-PCR is by far the most sensitive assay to detect residual disease in CML and can enable a single leukaemia cell to be detected in a background of 10(5)-10(6) normal cells. This is approximately 1000 x greater than the routine detection limit of the other methods. After allogeneic BMT, many CML patients are BCR-ABL positive for prolonged periods of time without subsequently relapsing. Thus the simple presence or absence of residual BCR-ABL transcripts in patients' leukocytes is of little value in the management of individual cases. Quantitative PCR techniques can distinguish between those PCR positive patients who have low or falling BCR-ABL levels on sequential analysis from those who have levels that are increasing. Provided assays are performed frequently enough, rising or persistently high numbers of BCR-ABL transcripts can be detected prior to frank relapse and this information may be used for early therapeutic intervention. Most patients who respond to treatment for relapse by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) achieve durable molecular remission. Quantitative PCR is also useful to gauge the response of CML patients to IFN-alpha. We have found that the great majority of patients in complete cytogenetic remission after treatment with IFN-alpha remain PCR positive and harbour a minority population of BCR-ABL positive myeloid precursor cells. It is unlikely therefore this treatment modality completely eliminates the disease in any patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology and cell therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology and cell therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者残留疾病分析的主要目的是评估患者对治疗的反应,并在异基因BMT患者中进行早期复发诊断。RT-PCR是迄今为止检测CML残留疾病最敏感的方法,可以在10(5)-10(6)个正常细胞的背景中检测到单个白血病细胞。这比其他方法的常规检测限大约高1000倍。同种异体骨髓移植后,许多CML患者在很长一段时间内BCR-ABL呈阳性,随后没有复发。因此,单纯的患者白细胞中残留BCR-ABL转录物的存在或不存在对个别病例的管理价值不大。定量PCR技术可以区分序列分析中BCR-ABL水平较低或下降的PCR阳性患者和升高的患者。如果检测足够频繁,BCR-ABL转录本数量的上升或持续高可以在复发之前检测到,这些信息可用于早期治疗干预。大多数对供体淋巴细胞输注(DLI)治疗复发有反应的患者获得持久的分子缓解。定量PCR也可用于评估CML患者对ifn - α的反应。我们发现,绝大多数经ifn - α治疗后细胞遗传学完全缓解的患者仍保持PCR阳性,并有少数BCR-ABL阳性骨髓前体细胞。因此,这种治疗方式不太可能完全消除任何患者的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

The principle aim of residual disease analysis in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is to gauge patient response to treatment and, in patients after allogeneic BMT, to enable early diagnosis of relapse. RT-PCR is by far the most sensitive assay to detect residual disease in CML and can enable a single leukaemia cell to be detected in a background of 10(5)-10(6) normal cells. This is approximately 1000 x greater than the routine detection limit of the other methods. After allogeneic BMT, many CML patients are BCR-ABL positive for prolonged periods of time without subsequently relapsing. Thus the simple presence or absence of residual BCR-ABL transcripts in patients' leukocytes is of little value in the management of individual cases. Quantitative PCR techniques can distinguish between those PCR positive patients who have low or falling BCR-ABL levels on sequential analysis from those who have levels that are increasing. Provided assays are performed frequently enough, rising or persistently high numbers of BCR-ABL transcripts can be detected prior to frank relapse and this information may be used for early therapeutic intervention. Most patients who respond to treatment for relapse by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) achieve durable molecular remission. Quantitative PCR is also useful to gauge the response of CML patients to IFN-alpha. We have found that the great majority of patients in complete cytogenetic remission after treatment with IFN-alpha remain PCR positive and harbour a minority population of BCR-ABL positive myeloid precursor cells. It is unlikely therefore this treatment modality completely eliminates the disease in any patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allogeneic bone marrow tranplantation for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: HLA-Matched sibling donor availability does not improve treatment ouctome Imbalance between the number of patients supplying stem cells for autologous transplantation and the number of patients receiving such transplants in France in 1997 and 1998 Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) a report of the BGMT cooperative group about 32 patients VECP-Bleo regimen as treatment of advanced stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in elderly patients a GOELAMS protocol Cost analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1