精神分裂症患者听觉诱发场中眼伪影的量化和排斥

T. Meier , T. Rosburg , M. Arnold , I. Kreitschmann-Andermahr , H. Sauer , H. Nowak , H. Witte
{"title":"精神分裂症患者听觉诱发场中眼伪影的量化和排斥","authors":"T. Meier ,&nbsp;T. Rosburg ,&nbsp;M. Arnold ,&nbsp;I. Kreitschmann-Andermahr ,&nbsp;H. Sauer ,&nbsp;H. Nowak ,&nbsp;H. Witte","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00031-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Results</strong>: In a magnetoencephalographic investigation of the auditory evoked field (AEF) in 17 schizophrenics and 17 controls, 37% of the schizophrenics and 12% of the controls showed eye artifacts in every second trial or even more frequently. In the uncorrected average fields, the ratio between the power of artifacts and the power of the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) exceeded the value of 0.1 for 48% of the schizophrenics and for 29% of the controls. Ocular artifacts biased the locations of equivalent current dipoles of the M100 component towards deeper positions. A regression algorithm for the correction of ocular artifacts in raw data and an identification technique of ocular artifacts based on the topography of transmission coefficients is described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: A linear dependence of ocular artifacts in AEF on the electrooculogram (EOG) was confirmed. Possible errors introduced by the correction are discussed. Transmission coefficients should be calculated for several individual trials with the same type of artifact. Errors due to evoked potentials in the EOG were found to be comparable in amplitude to noise in the AEF. Examples of transmission coefficients from the EOG to the MEG are given.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 6","pages":"Pages 526-535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00031-8","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification and rejection of ocular artifacts in auditory evoked fields in schizophrenics\",\"authors\":\"T. Meier ,&nbsp;T. Rosburg ,&nbsp;M. Arnold ,&nbsp;I. Kreitschmann-Andermahr ,&nbsp;H. Sauer ,&nbsp;H. Nowak ,&nbsp;H. Witte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00031-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Results</strong>: In a magnetoencephalographic investigation of the auditory evoked field (AEF) in 17 schizophrenics and 17 controls, 37% of the schizophrenics and 12% of the controls showed eye artifacts in every second trial or even more frequently. In the uncorrected average fields, the ratio between the power of artifacts and the power of the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) exceeded the value of 0.1 for 48% of the schizophrenics and for 29% of the controls. Ocular artifacts biased the locations of equivalent current dipoles of the M100 component towards deeper positions. A regression algorithm for the correction of ocular artifacts in raw data and an identification technique of ocular artifacts based on the topography of transmission coefficients is described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: A linear dependence of ocular artifacts in AEF on the electrooculogram (EOG) was confirmed. Possible errors introduced by the correction are discussed. Transmission coefficients should be calculated for several individual trials with the same type of artifact. Errors due to evoked potentials in the EOG were found to be comparable in amplitude to noise in the AEF. Examples of transmission coefficients from the EOG to the MEG are given.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"108 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 526-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00031-8\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

结果:对17名精神分裂症患者和17名对照组的听觉诱发场(AEF)进行了脑磁图调查,其中37%的精神分裂症患者和12%的对照组每隔一秒甚至更频繁地出现眼伪影。在未校正的平均视场中,48%的精神分裂症患者和29%的对照组的伪影功率与脑磁图(MEG)功率之比超过0.1。眼伪影使M100分量的等效电流偶极子的位置偏向更深的位置。介绍了一种原始数据眼伪影校正的回归算法和一种基于透射系数地形的眼伪影识别技术。结论:AEF的眼伪影与眼电图(EOG)呈线性关系。讨论了修正可能带来的误差。透射系数应计算几个单独的试验与相同类型的人工制品。EOG中诱发电位引起的误差在振幅上与AEF中的噪声相当。给出了从眼电图到脑电图传输系数的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantification and rejection of ocular artifacts in auditory evoked fields in schizophrenics

Results: In a magnetoencephalographic investigation of the auditory evoked field (AEF) in 17 schizophrenics and 17 controls, 37% of the schizophrenics and 12% of the controls showed eye artifacts in every second trial or even more frequently. In the uncorrected average fields, the ratio between the power of artifacts and the power of the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) exceeded the value of 0.1 for 48% of the schizophrenics and for 29% of the controls. Ocular artifacts biased the locations of equivalent current dipoles of the M100 component towards deeper positions. A regression algorithm for the correction of ocular artifacts in raw data and an identification technique of ocular artifacts based on the topography of transmission coefficients is described.

Conclusions: A linear dependence of ocular artifacts in AEF on the electrooculogram (EOG) was confirmed. Possible errors introduced by the correction are discussed. Transmission coefficients should be calculated for several individual trials with the same type of artifact. Errors due to evoked potentials in the EOG were found to be comparable in amplitude to noise in the AEF. Examples of transmission coefficients from the EOG to the MEG are given.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1