Katrin Hoffmann, Herbert Witte, Hannes Niedner, Rüdiger Vollandt
{"title":"使用较少数量的PVEP试验识别受刺激的半视网膜","authors":"Katrin Hoffmann, Herbert Witte, Hannes Niedner, Rüdiger Vollandt","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00035-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Left and right hemifield pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (PVEP) at P100 latency are characterised by typical field distributions of potential and the spectral parameter instantaneous frequency (IF). Both parameters can be utilised for the correct identification of the stimulated hemiretina in healthy volunteers (Hoffmann, K. et al. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 100, 1996: 569–578). The aim of this study was the investigation of the robustness of instantaneous frequency for reduced numbers of averages. Hemifield PVEP of 15 volunteers (20 channel records) were analysed. The number of averages was reduced step-by-step (64–32–16–8–4–1). For each average, the time of P100 latency was determined by the Global field power maximum between 90 and 125 ms. The stimulated hemifield was identified using the potential or instantaneous frequency values at the occipital electrode positions O1 and O2: by maximal potential and instantaneous frequency on the stimulus-contralateral side. In summary, by reduced numbers of averages (as well as by single trials) the stimulated hemiretina was correctly identified more frequently on the basis of instantaneous frequency than of potential distribution. A number of 8 averages seems to be sufficient for the correct identification of the stimulus condition. Consequently, for the identification of left and right hemifield stimulations the recording time could be reduced immensely. Instantaneous frequency is suggested as an additional and robust parameter for the selective averaging of artefact-free trials during the recording of hemifield PVEP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 6","pages":"Pages 560-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00035-5","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of the stimulated hemiretinae using a reduced number of PVEP trials\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Hoffmann, Herbert Witte, Hannes Niedner, Rüdiger Vollandt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00035-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Left and right hemifield pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (PVEP) at P100 latency are characterised by typical field distributions of potential and the spectral parameter instantaneous frequency (IF). Both parameters can be utilised for the correct identification of the stimulated hemiretina in healthy volunteers (Hoffmann, K. et al. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 100, 1996: 569–578). The aim of this study was the investigation of the robustness of instantaneous frequency for reduced numbers of averages. Hemifield PVEP of 15 volunteers (20 channel records) were analysed. The number of averages was reduced step-by-step (64–32–16–8–4–1). For each average, the time of P100 latency was determined by the Global field power maximum between 90 and 125 ms. The stimulated hemifield was identified using the potential or instantaneous frequency values at the occipital electrode positions O1 and O2: by maximal potential and instantaneous frequency on the stimulus-contralateral side. In summary, by reduced numbers of averages (as well as by single trials) the stimulated hemiretina was correctly identified more frequently on the basis of instantaneous frequency than of potential distribution. A number of 8 averages seems to be sufficient for the correct identification of the stimulus condition. Consequently, for the identification of left and right hemifield stimulations the recording time could be reduced immensely. Instantaneous frequency is suggested as an additional and robust parameter for the selective averaging of artefact-free trials during the recording of hemifield PVEP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"108 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 560-566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00035-5\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
P100潜伏期的左、右半场模式反转视觉诱发电位(PVEP)具有典型的电位场分布和瞬时频率(IF)谱参数。这两个参数都可用于正确识别健康志愿者受刺激的半视网膜(Hoffmann, K. et al.)。Electroenceph。中国。Neurophysiol。农业科学学报,1996:569-578)。本研究的目的是调查瞬时频率的鲁棒性,以减少平均值的数量。分析了15名志愿者的半场PVEP(20个通道记录)。平均数的数量逐步减少(64 - 32 - 16 - 8 - 1 - 1)。对于每个平均值,P100延迟时间由90到125 ms之间的全局场功率最大值确定。通过枕电极位置O1和O2的电位或瞬时频率值来识别受刺激的半场:通过刺激对侧的最大电位和瞬时频率来识别。总之,通过减少平均次数(以及单次试验),根据瞬时频率而不是电位分布,更频繁地正确识别受刺激的半视网膜。8个平均值似乎足以正确识别刺激条件。因此,对于左右半野刺激的识别,可以大大减少记录时间。在半场PVEP记录过程中,瞬时频率可作为无伪影试验选择性平均的附加鲁棒参数。
Identification of the stimulated hemiretinae using a reduced number of PVEP trials
Left and right hemifield pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (PVEP) at P100 latency are characterised by typical field distributions of potential and the spectral parameter instantaneous frequency (IF). Both parameters can be utilised for the correct identification of the stimulated hemiretina in healthy volunteers (Hoffmann, K. et al. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 100, 1996: 569–578). The aim of this study was the investigation of the robustness of instantaneous frequency for reduced numbers of averages. Hemifield PVEP of 15 volunteers (20 channel records) were analysed. The number of averages was reduced step-by-step (64–32–16–8–4–1). For each average, the time of P100 latency was determined by the Global field power maximum between 90 and 125 ms. The stimulated hemifield was identified using the potential or instantaneous frequency values at the occipital electrode positions O1 and O2: by maximal potential and instantaneous frequency on the stimulus-contralateral side. In summary, by reduced numbers of averages (as well as by single trials) the stimulated hemiretina was correctly identified more frequently on the basis of instantaneous frequency than of potential distribution. A number of 8 averages seems to be sufficient for the correct identification of the stimulus condition. Consequently, for the identification of left and right hemifield stimulations the recording time could be reduced immensely. Instantaneous frequency is suggested as an additional and robust parameter for the selective averaging of artefact-free trials during the recording of hemifield PVEP.