利用区域电源分析胫神经体感诱发电位的主要皮质成分

U Baumgärtner , H Vogel , J Ellrich , J Gawehn , P Stoeter , R.-D Treede
{"title":"利用区域电源分析胫神经体感诱发电位的主要皮质成分","authors":"U Baumgärtner ,&nbsp;H Vogel ,&nbsp;J Ellrich ,&nbsp;J Gawehn ,&nbsp;P Stoeter ,&nbsp;R.-D Treede","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00040-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Tibial nerve </span>somatosensory evoked potentials<span> (SEPs) show higher amplitudes ipsilateral to the side of stimulation, whereas subdural recordings revealed a source in the foot area of the contralateral hemisphere. We now investigated this paradoxical lateralization by performing a brain electrical source analysis in the P40 time window (34–46 ms). The tibial nerve was stimulated behind the ankle (8 subjects). On each side, 2048 stimuli were applied twice. SEPs were recorded using 32 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-verified electrode positions (bandpass 0.5–500 Hz). In each case, the P40 amplitude was higher ipsilaterally (0.45±0.14 </span></span><em>μ</em>V) than contralaterally (−0.49±0.16 <em>μ</em><span>V). The best fitting regional source, however, was always located in the contralateral hemisphere with a mean distance of 8.2±4.3 mm from the midline. The positivity pointed ipsilaterally shifting from a frontal orientation (P37) to a parietal direction (P40). The P40 dipole moment was 2.5 times stronger than the dipole moment of P37, which makes P40 most prominent in EEG recordings. However, with its oblique dipole orientation compared to the tangential P37 dipole, it is systematically underestimated in MEG. Dipole orientations explained interindividual variability of scalp potential distribution. SEP amplitudes were smaller when generated in the dominant (left) hemisphere. This is explained by deeper located sources (5.4±1.6 mm) with a more tangential orientation (</span><em>Δϑ</em>=17.5±2.3°) in the left hemisphere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 6","pages":"Pages 588-599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00040-9","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain electrical source analysis of primary cortical components of the tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential using regional sources\",\"authors\":\"U Baumgärtner ,&nbsp;H Vogel ,&nbsp;J Ellrich ,&nbsp;J Gawehn ,&nbsp;P Stoeter ,&nbsp;R.-D Treede\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00040-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Tibial nerve </span>somatosensory evoked potentials<span> (SEPs) show higher amplitudes ipsilateral to the side of stimulation, whereas subdural recordings revealed a source in the foot area of the contralateral hemisphere. We now investigated this paradoxical lateralization by performing a brain electrical source analysis in the P40 time window (34–46 ms). The tibial nerve was stimulated behind the ankle (8 subjects). On each side, 2048 stimuli were applied twice. SEPs were recorded using 32 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-verified electrode positions (bandpass 0.5–500 Hz). In each case, the P40 amplitude was higher ipsilaterally (0.45±0.14 </span></span><em>μ</em>V) than contralaterally (−0.49±0.16 <em>μ</em><span>V). The best fitting regional source, however, was always located in the contralateral hemisphere with a mean distance of 8.2±4.3 mm from the midline. The positivity pointed ipsilaterally shifting from a frontal orientation (P37) to a parietal direction (P40). The P40 dipole moment was 2.5 times stronger than the dipole moment of P37, which makes P40 most prominent in EEG recordings. However, with its oblique dipole orientation compared to the tangential P37 dipole, it is systematically underestimated in MEG. Dipole orientations explained interindividual variability of scalp potential distribution. SEP amplitudes were smaller when generated in the dominant (left) hemisphere. This is explained by deeper located sources (5.4±1.6 mm) with a more tangential orientation (</span><em>Δϑ</em>=17.5±2.3°) in the left hemisphere.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"108 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 588-599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00040-9\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559798000409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

胫骨神经体感诱发电位(SEPs)在刺激的同侧显示更高的振幅,而硬脑膜下记录显示在对侧半球的足区有一个源。我们现在通过在P40时间窗(34-46 ms)进行脑电源分析来研究这种矛盾的侧化。刺激踝关节后胫神经(8例)。每侧2048次刺激两次。使用32个磁共振成像(MRI)验证的电极位置(带通0.5-500 Hz)记录sep。P40振幅同侧(0.45±0.14 μV)高于对侧(- 0.49±0.16 μV)。然而,最适合的区域源总是位于对侧半球,平均距离中线8.2±4.3 mm。阳性提示同侧从额位(P37)向顶叶方向(P40)转移。P40偶极矩比P37偶极矩强2.5倍,使P40在脑电记录中最为突出。然而,与切向的P37偶极子相比,它的斜偶极子取向在MEG中被系统地低估了。偶极子取向解释了头皮电位分布的个体间差异。在主半球(左)产生的SEP振幅较小。这可以解释为位于更深的源(5.4±1.6 mm)与更切线的方向(Δϑ=17.5±2.3°)在左半球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brain electrical source analysis of primary cortical components of the tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential using regional sources

Tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) show higher amplitudes ipsilateral to the side of stimulation, whereas subdural recordings revealed a source in the foot area of the contralateral hemisphere. We now investigated this paradoxical lateralization by performing a brain electrical source analysis in the P40 time window (34–46 ms). The tibial nerve was stimulated behind the ankle (8 subjects). On each side, 2048 stimuli were applied twice. SEPs were recorded using 32 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-verified electrode positions (bandpass 0.5–500 Hz). In each case, the P40 amplitude was higher ipsilaterally (0.45±0.14 μV) than contralaterally (−0.49±0.16 μV). The best fitting regional source, however, was always located in the contralateral hemisphere with a mean distance of 8.2±4.3 mm from the midline. The positivity pointed ipsilaterally shifting from a frontal orientation (P37) to a parietal direction (P40). The P40 dipole moment was 2.5 times stronger than the dipole moment of P37, which makes P40 most prominent in EEG recordings. However, with its oblique dipole orientation compared to the tangential P37 dipole, it is systematically underestimated in MEG. Dipole orientations explained interindividual variability of scalp potential distribution. SEP amplitudes were smaller when generated in the dominant (left) hemisphere. This is explained by deeper located sources (5.4±1.6 mm) with a more tangential orientation (Δϑ=17.5±2.3°) in the left hemisphere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1