反向传播和自适应共振理论预测自杀风险。

I Modai, S Greenstain, A Weizman, S Mendel
{"title":"反向传播和自适应共振理论预测自杀风险。","authors":"I Modai,&nbsp;S Greenstain,&nbsp;A Weizman,&nbsp;S Mendel","doi":"10.3109/14639239809025368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability of backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory (ART) neural networks to predict the probability of complete suicide, within a two year span, in major psychiatric patients was investigated. Variables associated with suicide risk were collected from the files of 161 hospitalized psychiatric patients with a 10 year or greater history of illness. 84 patients were hospitalized due to suicide attempts and 77 had no previous suicide attempts or ideations. Suicide attempts were rated as medically serious suicide attempts (MSSA) or non-MSSA and used for training the systems. The ability of the neural networks was evaluated by screening the extremes of the suicidal spectrum (1) 54 records of patients who committed suicide and (2) 150 records of patients who never had suicidal thoughts. The records were taken from 3 hospitals, in various geographic regions in Israel. Neither neural network system is reliable in predicting suicide, however, records from one hospital, Gehah Hospital, were better identified than those from the two other hospitals (p < 0.05 for PPV; p < 0.01 for specificity). At present, neural networks are not reliable instruments for evaluating suicidal risk due to the significant number of false positive results. When low risk was indicated reliability was greater (NPV = 75.28%, specificity = 97.10% with ART; NPV = 91.76%, specificity = 95.12% with backpropagation). However, PPV, NPV and specificity rates of both systems achieved with Gehah Hospital records suggest that using a direct-subjective questionnaire may produce better results in the future. ART and backpropagation performed similarly in all measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":76132,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","volume":"23 4","pages":"325-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14639239809025368","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory in predicting suicidal risk.\",\"authors\":\"I Modai,&nbsp;S Greenstain,&nbsp;A Weizman,&nbsp;S Mendel\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/14639239809025368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability of backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory (ART) neural networks to predict the probability of complete suicide, within a two year span, in major psychiatric patients was investigated. Variables associated with suicide risk were collected from the files of 161 hospitalized psychiatric patients with a 10 year or greater history of illness. 84 patients were hospitalized due to suicide attempts and 77 had no previous suicide attempts or ideations. Suicide attempts were rated as medically serious suicide attempts (MSSA) or non-MSSA and used for training the systems. The ability of the neural networks was evaluated by screening the extremes of the suicidal spectrum (1) 54 records of patients who committed suicide and (2) 150 records of patients who never had suicidal thoughts. The records were taken from 3 hospitals, in various geographic regions in Israel. Neither neural network system is reliable in predicting suicide, however, records from one hospital, Gehah Hospital, were better identified than those from the two other hospitals (p < 0.05 for PPV; p < 0.01 for specificity). At present, neural networks are not reliable instruments for evaluating suicidal risk due to the significant number of false positive results. When low risk was indicated reliability was greater (NPV = 75.28%, specificity = 97.10% with ART; NPV = 91.76%, specificity = 95.12% with backpropagation). However, PPV, NPV and specificity rates of both systems achieved with Gehah Hospital records suggest that using a direct-subjective questionnaire may produce better results in the future. ART and backpropagation performed similarly in all measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"325-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14639239809025368\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239809025368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239809025368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

研究了反向传播和自适应共振理论(ART)神经网络预测重大精神病患者两年内完全自杀概率的能力。与自杀风险相关的变量从161名有10年或以上病史的住院精神病患者的档案中收集。84名患者因自杀未遂而住院,77名患者以前没有自杀企图或念头。自杀企图被评为医学上严重的自杀企图(MSSA)或非MSSA,并用于训练系统。神经网络的能力是通过筛选自杀谱系的极端来评估的(1)54名自杀患者的记录和(2)150名从未有过自杀想法的患者的记录。这些记录取自以色列不同地理区域的三家医院。两种神经网络系统在预测自杀方面都不可靠,然而,Gehah医院的记录比其他两家医院的记录更好地识别(p < 0.05;特异性P < 0.01)。目前,由于大量的假阳性结果,神经网络并不是评估自杀风险的可靠工具。低风险提示时,ART的可靠性更高(NPV = 75.28%,特异性= 97.10%;NPV = 91.76%,特异性为95.12%)。然而,根据Gehah医院的记录,两种系统的PPV、NPV和特异性表明,使用直接主观问卷可能会在未来产生更好的结果。ART和反向传播在所有测量中表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory in predicting suicidal risk.

The ability of backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory (ART) neural networks to predict the probability of complete suicide, within a two year span, in major psychiatric patients was investigated. Variables associated with suicide risk were collected from the files of 161 hospitalized psychiatric patients with a 10 year or greater history of illness. 84 patients were hospitalized due to suicide attempts and 77 had no previous suicide attempts or ideations. Suicide attempts were rated as medically serious suicide attempts (MSSA) or non-MSSA and used for training the systems. The ability of the neural networks was evaluated by screening the extremes of the suicidal spectrum (1) 54 records of patients who committed suicide and (2) 150 records of patients who never had suicidal thoughts. The records were taken from 3 hospitals, in various geographic regions in Israel. Neither neural network system is reliable in predicting suicide, however, records from one hospital, Gehah Hospital, were better identified than those from the two other hospitals (p < 0.05 for PPV; p < 0.01 for specificity). At present, neural networks are not reliable instruments for evaluating suicidal risk due to the significant number of false positive results. When low risk was indicated reliability was greater (NPV = 75.28%, specificity = 97.10% with ART; NPV = 91.76%, specificity = 95.12% with backpropagation). However, PPV, NPV and specificity rates of both systems achieved with Gehah Hospital records suggest that using a direct-subjective questionnaire may produce better results in the future. ART and backpropagation performed similarly in all measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hippocrates: an integrated platform for telemedicine applications. A network-based training environment: a medical image processing paradigm. A multi-agent architecture for teaching dermatology. Enhancing security and improving interoperability in healthcare information systems. Backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory in predicting suicidal risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1