C Nieder, U Nestle, R Ketter, H Kolles, S J Gentner, W I Steudel, K Schnabel
{"title":"多形性胶质母细胞瘤的超分割和加速超分割放疗。","authors":"C Nieder, U Nestle, R Ketter, H Kolles, S J Gentner, W I Steudel, K Schnabel","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of promising radiobiological advantages allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of treatment time, hyperfractionated and accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy (hf-rt, ahf-rt) were introduced as part of treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (gbm). In December 1988 we started a prospective study of hf-rt (total dose 78 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.3 Gy, interval between daily fractions 6 hr, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 34 patients). The results were compared with our previous regimen of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (cf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, single dose 2 Gy, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 32 patients). In June 1990, the protocol was modified in order to reduce treatment time (ahf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.5 Gy, interval 6 hr, treatment time 4 weeks, n = 92 patients until December 1996). No chemotherapy was given. Entry criteria were: age > or = 17 years, pathological diagnosis of supratentorial gbm, and no previous treatment other than surgery. The ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with previous surgical resection instead of biopsy only. Compared with the cf-rt group, both the hf-rt and the ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with frontal tumor location. We found no significant survival difference between the groups (median survival 7-10 months, 1-year survival rate 19%-29%). Progression-free survival, clinical course, and toxicity were also not significantly different. Karnofsky performance status, age, and corticosteroid dose during radiotherapy were the most important prognostic factors. The results of this trial are in large agreement with most previous publications. It demonstrated no improved survival. However, it showed that treatment time can be reduced by ahf-rt without loss of survival benefit or intolerable toxicity. A short radiotherapy course might be appropriate for many patients with gbm who are not suitable for rather aggressive investigational therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20894,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology investigations","volume":"7 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyperfractionated and accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme.\",\"authors\":\"C Nieder, U Nestle, R Ketter, H Kolles, S J Gentner, W I Steudel, K Schnabel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Because of promising radiobiological advantages allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of treatment time, hyperfractionated and accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy (hf-rt, ahf-rt) were introduced as part of treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (gbm). In December 1988 we started a prospective study of hf-rt (total dose 78 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.3 Gy, interval between daily fractions 6 hr, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 34 patients). The results were compared with our previous regimen of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (cf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, single dose 2 Gy, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 32 patients). In June 1990, the protocol was modified in order to reduce treatment time (ahf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.5 Gy, interval 6 hr, treatment time 4 weeks, n = 92 patients until December 1996). No chemotherapy was given. Entry criteria were: age > or = 17 years, pathological diagnosis of supratentorial gbm, and no previous treatment other than surgery. The ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with previous surgical resection instead of biopsy only. Compared with the cf-rt group, both the hf-rt and the ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with frontal tumor location. We found no significant survival difference between the groups (median survival 7-10 months, 1-year survival rate 19%-29%). Progression-free survival, clinical course, and toxicity were also not significantly different. Karnofsky performance status, age, and corticosteroid dose during radiotherapy were the most important prognostic factors. The results of this trial are in large agreement with most previous publications. It demonstrated no improved survival. However, it showed that treatment time can be reduced by ahf-rt without loss of survival benefit or intolerable toxicity. A short radiotherapy course might be appropriate for many patients with gbm who are not suitable for rather aggressive investigational therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"36-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:1<36::AID-ROI5>3.0.CO;2-O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hyperfractionated and accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme.
Because of promising radiobiological advantages allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of treatment time, hyperfractionated and accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy (hf-rt, ahf-rt) were introduced as part of treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (gbm). In December 1988 we started a prospective study of hf-rt (total dose 78 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.3 Gy, interval between daily fractions 6 hr, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 34 patients). The results were compared with our previous regimen of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (cf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, single dose 2 Gy, treatment time 6 weeks, n = 32 patients). In June 1990, the protocol was modified in order to reduce treatment time (ahf-rt: total dose 60 Gy, two daily fractions of 1.5 Gy, interval 6 hr, treatment time 4 weeks, n = 92 patients until December 1996). No chemotherapy was given. Entry criteria were: age > or = 17 years, pathological diagnosis of supratentorial gbm, and no previous treatment other than surgery. The ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with previous surgical resection instead of biopsy only. Compared with the cf-rt group, both the hf-rt and the ahf-rt group included significantly more patients with frontal tumor location. We found no significant survival difference between the groups (median survival 7-10 months, 1-year survival rate 19%-29%). Progression-free survival, clinical course, and toxicity were also not significantly different. Karnofsky performance status, age, and corticosteroid dose during radiotherapy were the most important prognostic factors. The results of this trial are in large agreement with most previous publications. It demonstrated no improved survival. However, it showed that treatment time can be reduced by ahf-rt without loss of survival benefit or intolerable toxicity. A short radiotherapy course might be appropriate for many patients with gbm who are not suitable for rather aggressive investigational therapies.