人格:当前的法律观点。

Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.) Pub Date : 1990-07-01

E J Larson

{"title":"人格:当前的法律观点。","authors":"E J Larson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical developments have given people unprecedented control over the beginning and end of life but have also altered traditional and legal concepts of personhood. Recent court decisions on prefetal life, fetuses, the infirm, and the dying reflect a struggle with the new ambiguity surrounding the definition of \"person.\"","PeriodicalId":79722,"journal":{"name":"Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)","volume":" 14","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personhood: current legal views.\",\"authors\":\"E J Larson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical developments have given people unprecedented control over the beginning and end of life but have also altered traditional and legal concepts of personhood. Recent court decisions on prefetal life, fetuses, the infirm, and the dying reflect a struggle with the new ambiguity surrounding the definition of \\\"person.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":79722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"40-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

医学的发展使人们对生命的开始和结束有了前所未有的控制权，但也改变了传统和法律上的人格概念。最近法院关于胎儿前生命、胎儿、体弱者和临终者的判决反映了围绕“人”定义的新的模糊性的斗争。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Personhood: current legal views.

Medical developments have given people unprecedented control over the beginning and end of life but have also altered traditional and legal concepts of personhood. Recent court decisions on prefetal life, fetuses, the infirm, and the dying reflect a struggle with the new ambiguity surrounding the definition of "person."

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Linda Krauss and the lap of God. A spiritual assessment case study. AIDS, Judaism, and the limits of the secular society. Can a healer be too wounded to heal? The reign of autonomy: is the end in sight? The case confessions of a pastoral visitor.