评估DUE标准的价值、准确性和操作可行性。

Formulary Pub Date : 1995-05-01
R Ben-Joseph, R Segal, W L Russell, T Oh
{"title":"评估DUE标准的价值、准确性和操作可行性。","authors":"R Ben-Joseph,&nbsp;R Segal,&nbsp;W L Russell,&nbsp;T Oh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the value, accuracy, and operational feasibility of indicators/criteria in a drug use evaluation (DUE) examining IV histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA). Pharmacists in 40 hospitals collected DUE data concurrent with hospital stays on a total of 1,200 patients. After completing the DUE, pharmacist data collectors were asked to evaluate each DUE criterion. Most reported that criteria relating to indications for use, therapeutic drug monitoring, and adverse drug reactions/drug interactions should be included in a DUE, but some criteria were not easy to collect or were inaccurate. The data suggest the need to carefully select DUE criteria that can be used for continuous improvements that meet JCAHO accreditation requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12354,"journal":{"name":"Formulary","volume":"30 5","pages":"280-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the value, accuracy, and operational feasibility of DUE criteria.\",\"authors\":\"R Ben-Joseph,&nbsp;R Segal,&nbsp;W L Russell,&nbsp;T Oh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the value, accuracy, and operational feasibility of indicators/criteria in a drug use evaluation (DUE) examining IV histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA). Pharmacists in 40 hospitals collected DUE data concurrent with hospital stays on a total of 1,200 patients. After completing the DUE, pharmacist data collectors were asked to evaluate each DUE criterion. Most reported that criteria relating to indications for use, therapeutic drug monitoring, and adverse drug reactions/drug interactions should be included in a DUE, but some criteria were not easy to collect or were inaccurate. The data suggest the need to carefully select DUE criteria that can be used for continuous improvements that meet JCAHO accreditation requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formulary\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"280-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formulary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formulary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估IV组胺2受体拮抗剂(H2-RA)的用药评价(DUE)指标/标准的价值、准确性和操作可行性。40家医院的药剂师收集了1200名患者住院期间的DUE数据。完成DUE后,要求药师数据收集者评估每个DUE标准。大多数报告说,与使用适应症、治疗药物监测和药物不良反应/药物相互作用有关的标准应包括在DUE中,但一些标准不容易收集或不准确。数据表明需要仔细选择DUE标准,这些标准可用于持续改进,以满足JCAHO认证要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the value, accuracy, and operational feasibility of DUE criteria.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the value, accuracy, and operational feasibility of indicators/criteria in a drug use evaluation (DUE) examining IV histamine2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA). Pharmacists in 40 hospitals collected DUE data concurrent with hospital stays on a total of 1,200 patients. After completing the DUE, pharmacist data collectors were asked to evaluate each DUE criterion. Most reported that criteria relating to indications for use, therapeutic drug monitoring, and adverse drug reactions/drug interactions should be included in a DUE, but some criteria were not easy to collect or were inaccurate. The data suggest the need to carefully select DUE criteria that can be used for continuous improvements that meet JCAHO accreditation requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Formulary
Formulary 医学-药学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
FDA approves rolapitant to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting You get what you need FDA expands Zytiga's use for late-stage prostate cancer Eyes to see, ears to hear This is pharmacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1