{"title":"南卡罗来纳医院管理者的角色。","authors":"E N Brandt, R W Broyles, D J Falcone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using discriminant analyses of data on 916 returned questionnaires from a mailing to 1,650 administrators in 82 South Carolina hospitals, this study examines the allocation of interpersonal, informational, decisional, and treatment roles among executive, administrative, and clinical directors. Educational attainment, years of experience, and gender were found to influence respondents' positions. Results also indicate that executive directors assume responsibility for the organization and its relation to the environment. As expected, those in clinical and administrative positions assume more responsibility for interpersonal and treatment roles than do executive directors.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"41 3","pages":"373-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roles of hospital administrators in South Carolina.\",\"authors\":\"E N Brandt, R W Broyles, D J Falcone\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using discriminant analyses of data on 916 returned questionnaires from a mailing to 1,650 administrators in 82 South Carolina hospitals, this study examines the allocation of interpersonal, informational, decisional, and treatment roles among executive, administrative, and clinical directors. Educational attainment, years of experience, and gender were found to influence respondents' positions. Results also indicate that executive directors assume responsibility for the organization and its relation to the environment. As expected, those in clinical and administrative positions assume more responsibility for interpersonal and treatment roles than do executive directors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital & health services administration\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"373-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital & health services administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & health services administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Roles of hospital administrators in South Carolina.
Using discriminant analyses of data on 916 returned questionnaires from a mailing to 1,650 administrators in 82 South Carolina hospitals, this study examines the allocation of interpersonal, informational, decisional, and treatment roles among executive, administrative, and clinical directors. Educational attainment, years of experience, and gender were found to influence respondents' positions. Results also indicate that executive directors assume responsibility for the organization and its relation to the environment. As expected, those in clinical and administrative positions assume more responsibility for interpersonal and treatment roles than do executive directors.