设计一个搜索策略来识别和检索使用MEDLINE的循证医疗保健文章。

Health libraries review Pub Date : 1997-03-01
J Harrison
{"title":"设计一个搜索策略来识别和检索使用MEDLINE的循证医疗保健文章。","authors":"J Harrison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The practice of evidence-based health care requires that information on methodology be identified from databases such as MEDLINE. Up until this year there have been no designated medical subject headings (MeSH) for evidence-based health care. 'EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE' appears as a MeSH term from 1997. The absence of designated MeSH for this concept prior to 1997 provides a challenge to the searcher. This paper describes the creation of a MEDLINE search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care published prior to the introduction of the new term, where an optimal combination of free-text and MeSH terms is required to identify relevant material. The study examines both free-text and subject heading searching and attempts an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. It begins by examining separate free-text and subject heading searches. Sensitivity of the subject heading search was 33% and specificity 80%, while the free-text search produced a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 67%. The final strategy, combining both approaches, was more successful with sensitivity reaching between 82 and 90% and specificity 83%. It is therefore possible to devise a search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care with relatively successful rates of sensitivity and specificity. The limitations of MEDLINE, however, necessitate the use of additional approaches in identifying articles on the methods of evidence-based health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73211,"journal":{"name":"Health libraries review","volume":"14 1","pages":"33-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a search strategy to identify and retrieve articles on evidence-based health care using MEDLINE.\",\"authors\":\"J Harrison\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The practice of evidence-based health care requires that information on methodology be identified from databases such as MEDLINE. Up until this year there have been no designated medical subject headings (MeSH) for evidence-based health care. 'EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE' appears as a MeSH term from 1997. The absence of designated MeSH for this concept prior to 1997 provides a challenge to the searcher. This paper describes the creation of a MEDLINE search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care published prior to the introduction of the new term, where an optimal combination of free-text and MeSH terms is required to identify relevant material. The study examines both free-text and subject heading searching and attempts an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. It begins by examining separate free-text and subject heading searches. Sensitivity of the subject heading search was 33% and specificity 80%, while the free-text search produced a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 67%. The final strategy, combining both approaches, was more successful with sensitivity reaching between 82 and 90% and specificity 83%. It is therefore possible to devise a search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care with relatively successful rates of sensitivity and specificity. The limitations of MEDLINE, however, necessitate the use of additional approaches in identifying articles on the methods of evidence-based health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health libraries review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"33-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health libraries review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health libraries review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于证据的卫生保健实践要求从MEDLINE等数据库中确定有关方法的信息。直到今年,还没有为循证医疗保健指定医学主题(MeSH)。“循证医学”是1997年出现的一个MeSH术语。在1997年之前,这个概念缺乏指定的MeSH,这给搜索者带来了挑战。本文描述了一个MEDLINE搜索策略的创建,用于检索在引入新术语之前发表的关于循证卫生保健方法的文章,其中需要自由文本和MeSH术语的最佳组合来识别相关材料。该研究检查了自由文本和主题标题搜索,并试图在敏感性和特异性之间取得最佳平衡。它首先检查单独的自由文本和主题标题搜索。主题标题搜索的灵敏度为33%,特异性为80%,而自由文本搜索的灵敏度为50%,特异性为67%。结合两种方法的最终策略更成功,灵敏度达到82 - 90%,特异性达到83%。因此,有可能设计一种检索策略,检索有关循证卫生保健方法的文章,其敏感性和特异性相对成功。然而,MEDLINE的局限性需要使用其他方法来识别循证卫生保健方法的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing a search strategy to identify and retrieve articles on evidence-based health care using MEDLINE.

The practice of evidence-based health care requires that information on methodology be identified from databases such as MEDLINE. Up until this year there have been no designated medical subject headings (MeSH) for evidence-based health care. 'EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE' appears as a MeSH term from 1997. The absence of designated MeSH for this concept prior to 1997 provides a challenge to the searcher. This paper describes the creation of a MEDLINE search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care published prior to the introduction of the new term, where an optimal combination of free-text and MeSH terms is required to identify relevant material. The study examines both free-text and subject heading searching and attempts an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. It begins by examining separate free-text and subject heading searches. Sensitivity of the subject heading search was 33% and specificity 80%, while the free-text search produced a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 67%. The final strategy, combining both approaches, was more successful with sensitivity reaching between 82 and 90% and specificity 83%. It is therefore possible to devise a search strategy to retrieve articles on the methods of evidence-based health care with relatively successful rates of sensitivity and specificity. The limitations of MEDLINE, however, necessitate the use of additional approaches in identifying articles on the methods of evidence-based health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical journals and effective dissemination of health research Medical history for tomorrow-preserving the record of today The Open University history of medicine CD-ROM The Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London and the history of medicine Why historians of medicine need your help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1