重新设计思想、职业、系统、部门。

C A Holland
{"title":"重新设计思想、职业、系统、部门。","authors":"C A Holland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1993, Hammer and Champy inspired many health-care institutions to initiate reengineering projects with their prediction that America's largest corporations would fail if they did not apply the principles of business reengineering. Many of these companies reengineered to simplify their processes but did not achieve radical gains. Who or what is to blame for the failures? Does health care's complexity play a role in these failures? A 1981 study found that health care is more than 2,000% more complex than the standard business. It concluded that \"routine\" management strategies do not provide a sufficiently comprehensive theory for managing health care's complexity. This article addresses the need to reengineer on four levels--the mind, career, system, and department--to circumvent these complexities. Reengineering on each level enhances the chances for success on the other levels. In today's tumultuous health-care environment, you need to understand your role in reengineering at each level so you can implement it, support it, and live it. If you succeed, you will achieve radical gains, add a valuable tool to your repertoire, enhance your self-confidence, and become a leader in the industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":79576,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association","volume":"12 3","pages":"169-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reengineering the mind, career, system, department.\",\"authors\":\"C A Holland\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1993, Hammer and Champy inspired many health-care institutions to initiate reengineering projects with their prediction that America's largest corporations would fail if they did not apply the principles of business reengineering. Many of these companies reengineered to simplify their processes but did not achieve radical gains. Who or what is to blame for the failures? Does health care's complexity play a role in these failures? A 1981 study found that health care is more than 2,000% more complex than the standard business. It concluded that \\\"routine\\\" management strategies do not provide a sufficiently comprehensive theory for managing health care's complexity. This article addresses the need to reengineer on four levels--the mind, career, system, and department--to circumvent these complexities. Reengineering on each level enhances the chances for success on the other levels. In today's tumultuous health-care environment, you need to understand your role in reengineering at each level so you can implement it, support it, and live it. If you succeed, you will achieve radical gains, add a valuable tool to your repertoire, enhance your self-confidence, and become a leader in the industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"169-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1993年,哈默和钱皮预测,如果美国最大的公司不应用业务重组的原则,它们就会倒闭,这促使许多医疗保健机构启动了业务重组项目。其中许多公司进行了重组,简化了流程,但并没有取得重大进展。谁或什么应该为这些失败负责?医疗保健的复杂性是否在这些失败中发挥了作用?1981年的一项研究发现,医疗保健比普通行业复杂2000%以上。它的结论是,“常规”管理策略不能为管理医疗保健的复杂性提供一个足够全面的理论。本文阐述了在四个层面上进行重新设计的必要性——思想、职业、系统和部门——以规避这些复杂性。每个层次上的重组都能提高其他层次上成功的机会。在当今纷乱的医疗保健环境中,您需要了解自己在每个级别的再造中所扮演的角色,以便能够实施、支持和实践它。如果你成功了,你将获得巨大的收益,为你的技能增加一个有价值的工具,增强你的自信,并成为行业的领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reengineering the mind, career, system, department.

In 1993, Hammer and Champy inspired many health-care institutions to initiate reengineering projects with their prediction that America's largest corporations would fail if they did not apply the principles of business reengineering. Many of these companies reengineered to simplify their processes but did not achieve radical gains. Who or what is to blame for the failures? Does health care's complexity play a role in these failures? A 1981 study found that health care is more than 2,000% more complex than the standard business. It concluded that "routine" management strategies do not provide a sufficiently comprehensive theory for managing health care's complexity. This article addresses the need to reengineer on four levels--the mind, career, system, and department--to circumvent these complexities. Reengineering on each level enhances the chances for success on the other levels. In today's tumultuous health-care environment, you need to understand your role in reengineering at each level so you can implement it, support it, and live it. If you succeed, you will achieve radical gains, add a valuable tool to your repertoire, enhance your self-confidence, and become a leader in the industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care testing. Dollar$ & $en$e. Part III: Measuring added value. The use of the Delphi panel for consensus development on indicators of laboratory performance. What is your return on your skills investment? As we see it. Outreach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1