船载远程医疗的成本效益分析。

P H Stoloff, F E Garcia, J E Thomason, D S Shia
{"title":"船载远程医疗的成本效益分析。","authors":"P H Stoloff,&nbsp;F E Garcia,&nbsp;J E Thomason,&nbsp;D S Shia","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The U.S. Navy is considering the installation of telemedicine equipment on more than 300 ships. Besides improving the quality of care, benefits would arise from avoiding medical evacuations (MEDEVACs) and returning patients to work more quickly. Because telemedicine has not yet been fully implemented by the Navy, we relied on projections of anticipated savings and costs, rather than actual expenditures, to determine cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the demand for telemedicine and the cost-effectiveness of various technologies (telephone and fax, e-mail and Internet, video teleconferencing (VTC), teleradiology, and diagnostic instruments), as well as their bandwidth requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of Navy medical experts with telemedicine experience reviewed a representative sample of patient visits collected over a 1-year period and estimated the man-day savings and quality-of-care enhancements that might have occurred had telemedicine technologies been available. The savings from potentially avoiding MEDEVACs was estimated from a survey of ships' medical staff. These sample estimates were then projected to the medical workload of the entire fleet. Off-the-shelf telemedicine equipment prices were combined with installation, maintenance, training, and communication costs to obtain the lifecycle costs of the technology.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>If telemedicine were available to the fleet, ship medical staffs would initiate nearly 19, 000 consults in a year-7% of all patient visits. Telemedicine would enhance quality of care in two-thirds of these consults. Seventeen percent of the MEDEVACs would be preventable with telemedicine (representing 155,000 travel miles), with a savings of $4400 per MEDEVAC. If the ship's communication capabilities were available, e-mail and Internet and telephone and fax would be cost-effective on all ships (including small ships and submarines). Video teleconferencing would be cost-effective on large ships (aircraft carriers and amphibious) only. Teleradiology would be cost-effective on carriers only. Telemedicine's bandwidth requirement is small-1% of a month's time. However, if the ships' medical departments need to resort to a commercial satellite, E-mail and Internet would be the only telemedicine modality generating enough monetary benefits to offset the costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 4","pages":"293-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cost-effectiveness analysis of shipboard telemedicine.\",\"authors\":\"P H Stoloff,&nbsp;F E Garcia,&nbsp;J E Thomason,&nbsp;D S Shia\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The U.S. Navy is considering the installation of telemedicine equipment on more than 300 ships. Besides improving the quality of care, benefits would arise from avoiding medical evacuations (MEDEVACs) and returning patients to work more quickly. Because telemedicine has not yet been fully implemented by the Navy, we relied on projections of anticipated savings and costs, rather than actual expenditures, to determine cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the demand for telemedicine and the cost-effectiveness of various technologies (telephone and fax, e-mail and Internet, video teleconferencing (VTC), teleradiology, and diagnostic instruments), as well as their bandwidth requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of Navy medical experts with telemedicine experience reviewed a representative sample of patient visits collected over a 1-year period and estimated the man-day savings and quality-of-care enhancements that might have occurred had telemedicine technologies been available. The savings from potentially avoiding MEDEVACs was estimated from a survey of ships' medical staff. These sample estimates were then projected to the medical workload of the entire fleet. Off-the-shelf telemedicine equipment prices were combined with installation, maintenance, training, and communication costs to obtain the lifecycle costs of the technology.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>If telemedicine were available to the fleet, ship medical staffs would initiate nearly 19, 000 consults in a year-7% of all patient visits. Telemedicine would enhance quality of care in two-thirds of these consults. Seventeen percent of the MEDEVACs would be preventable with telemedicine (representing 155,000 travel miles), with a savings of $4400 per MEDEVAC. If the ship's communication capabilities were available, e-mail and Internet and telephone and fax would be cost-effective on all ships (including small ships and submarines). Video teleconferencing would be cost-effective on large ships (aircraft carriers and amphibious) only. Teleradiology would be cost-effective on carriers only. Telemedicine's bandwidth requirement is small-1% of a month's time. However, if the ships' medical departments need to resort to a commercial satellite, E-mail and Internet would be the only telemedicine modality generating enough monetary benefits to offset the costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"293-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:美国海军正在考虑在300多艘舰艇上安装远程医疗设备。除了提高护理质量外,避免医疗后送和更快地让病人重返工作岗位也会带来好处。由于远程医疗尚未在海军全面实施,我们依赖于预期节省和成本的预测,而不是实际支出,来确定成本效益。目的:确定远程医疗的需求和各种技术(电话和传真、电子邮件和互联网、视频电话会议(VTC)、远程放射学和诊断仪器)的成本效益,以及它们的带宽需求。方法:具有远程医疗经验的海军医学专家小组回顾了1年期间收集的有代表性的患者就诊样本,并估计了如果远程医疗技术可用,可能会节省人力和提高护理质量。通过对船舶医务人员的调查估计,可能避免使用医疗后送设备所节省的费用。然后将这些样本估计值预测到整个船队的医疗工作量。将现成的远程医疗设备价格与安装、维护、培训和通信成本相结合,以获得该技术的生命周期成本。结果和结论:如果远程医疗在船队中可用,船上医务人员每年将启动近19,000次咨询,占所有患者就诊的7%。远程医疗将提高三分之二的咨询服务质量。17%的医疗后送直升机可以通过远程医疗来预防(相当于155,000英里的行程),每架医疗后送直升机可以节省4400美元。如果舰艇的通信能力可用,电子邮件和因特网、电话和传真在所有舰艇(包括小型舰艇和潜艇)上将具有成本效益。视频电话会议只有在大型船只(航空母舰和两栖)上才具有成本效益。电视放射学只有在载体上才具有成本效益。远程医疗的带宽需求很小,仅占一个月时间的1%。然而,如果船上的医疗部门需要求助于商业卫星,电子邮件和互联网将是唯一的远程医疗模式,产生足够的金钱效益来抵消成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cost-effectiveness analysis of shipboard telemedicine.

Background: The U.S. Navy is considering the installation of telemedicine equipment on more than 300 ships. Besides improving the quality of care, benefits would arise from avoiding medical evacuations (MEDEVACs) and returning patients to work more quickly. Because telemedicine has not yet been fully implemented by the Navy, we relied on projections of anticipated savings and costs, rather than actual expenditures, to determine cost-effectiveness.

Objectives: To determine the demand for telemedicine and the cost-effectiveness of various technologies (telephone and fax, e-mail and Internet, video teleconferencing (VTC), teleradiology, and diagnostic instruments), as well as their bandwidth requirements.

Methods: A panel of Navy medical experts with telemedicine experience reviewed a representative sample of patient visits collected over a 1-year period and estimated the man-day savings and quality-of-care enhancements that might have occurred had telemedicine technologies been available. The savings from potentially avoiding MEDEVACs was estimated from a survey of ships' medical staff. These sample estimates were then projected to the medical workload of the entire fleet. Off-the-shelf telemedicine equipment prices were combined with installation, maintenance, training, and communication costs to obtain the lifecycle costs of the technology.

Results and conclusions: If telemedicine were available to the fleet, ship medical staffs would initiate nearly 19, 000 consults in a year-7% of all patient visits. Telemedicine would enhance quality of care in two-thirds of these consults. Seventeen percent of the MEDEVACs would be preventable with telemedicine (representing 155,000 travel miles), with a savings of $4400 per MEDEVAC. If the ship's communication capabilities were available, e-mail and Internet and telephone and fax would be cost-effective on all ships (including small ships and submarines). Video teleconferencing would be cost-effective on large ships (aircraft carriers and amphibious) only. Teleradiology would be cost-effective on carriers only. Telemedicine's bandwidth requirement is small-1% of a month's time. However, if the ships' medical departments need to resort to a commercial satellite, E-mail and Internet would be the only telemedicine modality generating enough monetary benefits to offset the costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Abstract from the American Telemedicine Association's Fifth Annual Meeting May 21-24, 2000, Phoenix, Arizona. Behavioral Telemedicine: A New Approach to the Continuous Nonintrusive Monitoring of Activities of Daily Living Specialist–Primary Care Provider–Patient Communication in Telemedical Consultations Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1