精神病学和危险病人——问题:违反保密规定。

P G Wachsman
{"title":"精神病学和危险病人——问题:违反保密规定。","authors":"P G Wachsman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malpractice in the field of psychiatry underscores the legal and ethical conflicts between the patient's right to confidentiality of communications and the physician's duty to protect an individual or society from possible harm at the hands of his patient. There are three criteria used currently to predict violent behavior. None are clear-cut and neither the courts nor professional societies offer the practitioner much protection. The author suggests some courses of action for the psychiatrist to minimize the risk of malpractice.</p>","PeriodicalId":80221,"journal":{"name":"The Medical malpractice cost containment journal","volume":"1 2","pages":"150-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychiatry and the dangerous patient--problem: breach of confidentiality.\",\"authors\":\"P G Wachsman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malpractice in the field of psychiatry underscores the legal and ethical conflicts between the patient's right to confidentiality of communications and the physician's duty to protect an individual or society from possible harm at the hands of his patient. There are three criteria used currently to predict violent behavior. None are clear-cut and neither the courts nor professional societies offer the practitioner much protection. The author suggests some courses of action for the psychiatrist to minimize the risk of malpractice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical malpractice cost containment journal\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"150-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical malpractice cost containment journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical malpractice cost containment journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病学领域的医疗事故凸显了患者通信保密的权利与医生保护个人或社会免受患者可能造成的伤害的责任之间的法律和伦理冲突。目前有三个标准用于预测暴力行为。没有一个是明确的,法院和专业协会都没有为从业者提供多少保护。作者建议精神病医生采取一些行动,以尽量减少医疗事故的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychiatry and the dangerous patient--problem: breach of confidentiality.

Malpractice in the field of psychiatry underscores the legal and ethical conflicts between the patient's right to confidentiality of communications and the physician's duty to protect an individual or society from possible harm at the hands of his patient. There are three criteria used currently to predict violent behavior. None are clear-cut and neither the courts nor professional societies offer the practitioner much protection. The author suggests some courses of action for the psychiatrist to minimize the risk of malpractice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sample forms. The Human Dimension The trial of a malpractice case: part two. Reducing malpractice claims through proper maintenance of medical records. Medical records and malpractice claims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1