恢复室的一次性加湿器——微生物评估。

APIC Pub Date : 1979-09-01
M B McGuckin, J Boyer, L R Soling, R J Thorpe, F M Hess, T Wardrop
{"title":"恢复室的一次性加湿器——微生物评估。","authors":"M B McGuckin,&nbsp;J Boyer,&nbsp;L R Soling,&nbsp;R J Thorpe,&nbsp;F M Hess,&nbsp;T Wardrop","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humidification, unlike nebulization, does not produce water droplets in the process of producing desiccated gases, and therefore is considered low risk in terms of potential infection sources. However, direct inoculation of bacteria into these units has been shown to produce contaminated effluents. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine if the airborne route of contamination was a potential source of bacterial inoculum for these units and to determine the maximum number of days units remained free of bacterial contamination. Disposable humidifiers were placed in both high and low volume patient areas of the recovery room. Units were used on multiple patients with only the cannula replaced between patients. Our results showed that these units do have the potential for becoming inoculated through the airborne route, but did not produce contaminated effluents greater than background air. Units remained sterile during the entire time in use in both high and low volume areas. In conclusion, our data suggests that each institution should evaluate the usage of disposable humidifiers based on patient parameters and environment rather than manufacturer's guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":79789,"journal":{"name":"APIC","volume":"7 3","pages":"20-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disposable humidifiers in a recovery room--a microbiological evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"M B McGuckin,&nbsp;J Boyer,&nbsp;L R Soling,&nbsp;R J Thorpe,&nbsp;F M Hess,&nbsp;T Wardrop\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humidification, unlike nebulization, does not produce water droplets in the process of producing desiccated gases, and therefore is considered low risk in terms of potential infection sources. However, direct inoculation of bacteria into these units has been shown to produce contaminated effluents. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine if the airborne route of contamination was a potential source of bacterial inoculum for these units and to determine the maximum number of days units remained free of bacterial contamination. Disposable humidifiers were placed in both high and low volume patient areas of the recovery room. Units were used on multiple patients with only the cannula replaced between patients. Our results showed that these units do have the potential for becoming inoculated through the airborne route, but did not produce contaminated effluents greater than background air. Units remained sterile during the entire time in use in both high and low volume areas. In conclusion, our data suggests that each institution should evaluate the usage of disposable humidifiers based on patient parameters and environment rather than manufacturer's guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"APIC\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"20-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"APIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与雾化不同,加湿在产生干燥气体的过程中不会产生水滴,因此在潜在感染源方面被认为是低风险的。然而,已证明直接将细菌接种到这些装置中会产生受污染的废水。因此,本研究旨在确定空气污染途径是否是这些单位细菌接种的潜在来源,并确定单位保持无细菌污染的最大天数。一次性加湿器放置在康复室的高容量和低容量病人区。该装置用于多例患者,仅在患者之间更换套管。我们的研究结果表明,这些单位确实有可能通过空气传播途径接种,但没有产生比本底空气更大的污染流出物。单位保持无菌在使用的整个时间在高和低容量区域。总之,我们的数据表明,每个机构应该根据患者参数和环境来评估一次性加湿器的使用情况,而不是根据制造商的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disposable humidifiers in a recovery room--a microbiological evaluation.

Humidification, unlike nebulization, does not produce water droplets in the process of producing desiccated gases, and therefore is considered low risk in terms of potential infection sources. However, direct inoculation of bacteria into these units has been shown to produce contaminated effluents. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine if the airborne route of contamination was a potential source of bacterial inoculum for these units and to determine the maximum number of days units remained free of bacterial contamination. Disposable humidifiers were placed in both high and low volume patient areas of the recovery room. Units were used on multiple patients with only the cannula replaced between patients. Our results showed that these units do have the potential for becoming inoculated through the airborne route, but did not produce contaminated effluents greater than background air. Units remained sterile during the entire time in use in both high and low volume areas. In conclusion, our data suggests that each institution should evaluate the usage of disposable humidifiers based on patient parameters and environment rather than manufacturer's guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hospital infection Control Development and application of an antimicrobial-susceptibility guide. Legionnaires' Disease. Hospital infection control. Protective isolation techniques for leukemic patients: a review and commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1