耶鲁算法。特殊的研讨会——临床。

M S Kramer, T A Hutchinson
{"title":"耶鲁算法。特殊的研讨会——临床。","authors":"M S Kramer,&nbsp;T A Hutchinson","doi":"10.1177/009286158401800315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of causality in drug-event associations depends on the setting and purpose of such an assessment. Epidemiologists are primarily interested in population-based inferences about whether a given drug can cause a certain adverse drug reaction (ADR), and if so, how often it does so. Pharmaceutical industries and regulatory agencies are also concerned with population-based risks, but in addition must worry about individual cases. Clinicians are primarily interested in the individual, ie, whether a given drug did cause a certain adverse event in a particular patient. The authors describe an algorithm that provides specific, detailed criteria for ranking the probability that an observed untoward clinical manifestation was caused by a given drug. The criteria are subdivided into six axes of decision strategy with a built-in scoring system that ordinally ranks the probability of an adverse drug reaction as definite, probable, possible, or unlikely. To illustrate the use of the algorithm, the authors assess a reference case of pancreatitis occurring after administration of methyldopa.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"18 3-4","pages":"283-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158401800315","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Yale algorithm. Special workshop--clinical.\",\"authors\":\"M S Kramer,&nbsp;T A Hutchinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/009286158401800315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of causality in drug-event associations depends on the setting and purpose of such an assessment. Epidemiologists are primarily interested in population-based inferences about whether a given drug can cause a certain adverse drug reaction (ADR), and if so, how often it does so. Pharmaceutical industries and regulatory agencies are also concerned with population-based risks, but in addition must worry about individual cases. Clinicians are primarily interested in the individual, ie, whether a given drug did cause a certain adverse event in a particular patient. The authors describe an algorithm that provides specific, detailed criteria for ranking the probability that an observed untoward clinical manifestation was caused by a given drug. The criteria are subdivided into six axes of decision strategy with a built-in scoring system that ordinally ranks the probability of an adverse drug reaction as definite, probable, possible, or unlikely. To illustrate the use of the algorithm, the authors assess a reference case of pancreatitis occurring after administration of methyldopa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Information Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 3-4\",\"pages\":\"283-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158401800315\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Information Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158401800315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158401800315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

对药物-事件关联的因果关系的评估取决于这种评估的设定和目的。流行病学家主要感兴趣的是基于人群的推断,即某种药物是否会引起某种药物不良反应(ADR),如果会,发生的频率是多少。制药业和监管机构也关注基于人群的风险,但除此之外还必须担心个别病例。临床医生主要对个体感兴趣,也就是说,某种药物是否会在特定患者身上引起某种不良事件。作者描述了一种算法,该算法提供了具体、详细的标准,用于对观察到的不良临床表现由给定药物引起的可能性进行排序。这些标准被细分为决策策略的六个轴,有一个内置的评分系统,通常将药物不良反应的概率分为确定、可能、可能或不可能。为了说明该算法的使用,作者评估了甲多巴给药后发生的胰腺炎的参考病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Yale algorithm. Special workshop--clinical.

The assessment of causality in drug-event associations depends on the setting and purpose of such an assessment. Epidemiologists are primarily interested in population-based inferences about whether a given drug can cause a certain adverse drug reaction (ADR), and if so, how often it does so. Pharmaceutical industries and regulatory agencies are also concerned with population-based risks, but in addition must worry about individual cases. Clinicians are primarily interested in the individual, ie, whether a given drug did cause a certain adverse event in a particular patient. The authors describe an algorithm that provides specific, detailed criteria for ranking the probability that an observed untoward clinical manifestation was caused by a given drug. The criteria are subdivided into six axes of decision strategy with a built-in scoring system that ordinally ranks the probability of an adverse drug reaction as definite, probable, possible, or unlikely. To illustrate the use of the algorithm, the authors assess a reference case of pancreatitis occurring after administration of methyldopa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data. A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles. Testing in a Prespecified Subgroup and the Intent-to-Treat Population. The Correction of Product Information in Drug References and Medical Textbooks Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1