确保获得新医疗技术的道德义务?

Journal of health care technology Pub Date : 1984-01-01
A M Capron
{"title":"确保获得新医疗技术的道德义务?","authors":"A M Capron","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of health care's special status, society has an ethical obligation to ensure that all people have access to an adequate level of health care (including access to new technologies as well as existing ones), without facing excessive burdens in obtaining such care. Society's recognition and implementation of this obligation is all the more important because market forces, alone, will not produce appropriate distribution of health care resources. For those making decisions about resource allocation, ethical pitfalls can best be avoided if policy formulation is differentiated from clinical decisions about specific patients' access to care. The latter can and should be made by each patient's physician, but, to be effective, the former must be accomplished in broadly based political processes by both health care professionals and others. Further, decision making about access to new technologies should begin early in the research and development process, and should involve Medicare and other insurance carriers that will be called upon to pay for the technology. This course is highly preferable to waiting until the technology is ready for wide use--as is now common--and only then deciding whether to pay for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":80026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health care technology","volume":"1 2","pages":"103-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ethical obligation to ensure access to new medical technologies?\",\"authors\":\"A M Capron\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Because of health care's special status, society has an ethical obligation to ensure that all people have access to an adequate level of health care (including access to new technologies as well as existing ones), without facing excessive burdens in obtaining such care. Society's recognition and implementation of this obligation is all the more important because market forces, alone, will not produce appropriate distribution of health care resources. For those making decisions about resource allocation, ethical pitfalls can best be avoided if policy formulation is differentiated from clinical decisions about specific patients' access to care. The latter can and should be made by each patient's physician, but, to be effective, the former must be accomplished in broadly based political processes by both health care professionals and others. Further, decision making about access to new technologies should begin early in the research and development process, and should involve Medicare and other insurance carriers that will be called upon to pay for the technology. This course is highly preferable to waiting until the technology is ready for wide use--as is now common--and only then deciding whether to pay for it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health care technology\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"103-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health care technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health care technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于卫生保健的特殊地位,社会在道德上有义务确保所有人都能获得适当水平的卫生保健(包括获得新技术和现有技术),而不会在获得这种保健方面面临过重的负担。社会对这一义务的认识和执行更为重要,因为单靠市场力量不会产生保健资源的适当分配。对于那些做出资源分配决策的人来说,如果将政策制定与关于特定患者获得护理的临床决策区分开来,就可以最好地避免伦理陷阱。后者可以而且应该由每个病人的医生制定,但是,要想有效,前者必须由卫生保健专业人员和其他人在基础广泛的政治进程中完成。此外,关于获得新技术的决策应该在研发过程的早期就开始,并且应该让医疗保险和其他保险公司参与进来,因为它们将被要求为这项技术买单。这比等到技术准备好广泛应用——现在很普遍——然后再决定是否为它买单要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An ethical obligation to ensure access to new medical technologies?

Because of health care's special status, society has an ethical obligation to ensure that all people have access to an adequate level of health care (including access to new technologies as well as existing ones), without facing excessive burdens in obtaining such care. Society's recognition and implementation of this obligation is all the more important because market forces, alone, will not produce appropriate distribution of health care resources. For those making decisions about resource allocation, ethical pitfalls can best be avoided if policy formulation is differentiated from clinical decisions about specific patients' access to care. The latter can and should be made by each patient's physician, but, to be effective, the former must be accomplished in broadly based political processes by both health care professionals and others. Further, decision making about access to new technologies should begin early in the research and development process, and should involve Medicare and other insurance carriers that will be called upon to pay for the technology. This course is highly preferable to waiting until the technology is ready for wide use--as is now common--and only then deciding whether to pay for it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive bone mineral assessment. Is automated urinalysis in your laboratory's future? Swiss Hospital Institute's approach to the problems of magnetic resonance imaging. The legal system, insurance, and health care. What can be done about the liability problem? An ECRI technology management assessment. Reuse and reprocessing of disposable medical devices. Legal liability issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1