病史专家系统的工程知识。

Journal of clinical computing Pub Date : 1987-01-01
H J Seelos
{"title":"病史专家系统的工程知识。","authors":"H J Seelos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computerized information systems that support medical decision-making are based upon formalized medical knowledge. Therefore, appropriate methods of knowledge engineering are of conspicuous importance. In order to arrive at a medical-history expert system, a target-oriented construction method of knowledge engineering was devised. Beginning with a framework of diagnostic categories, an optimal set of reliable and valid questions were formulated. In this paper, two independently developed general medicine questionnaires prepared by such a method are comparatively presented. It is shown that (a) inspite of a good deal of similarity between the two frames of reference considerable differences exist between the two sets of selected questions, and (b) the valid collection of medical information is limited to diagnostic categories that allow a clear description of medical symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":79662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical computing","volume":"15 6","pages":"211-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge of engineering for a medical-history expert system.\",\"authors\":\"H J Seelos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Computerized information systems that support medical decision-making are based upon formalized medical knowledge. Therefore, appropriate methods of knowledge engineering are of conspicuous importance. In order to arrive at a medical-history expert system, a target-oriented construction method of knowledge engineering was devised. Beginning with a framework of diagnostic categories, an optimal set of reliable and valid questions were formulated. In this paper, two independently developed general medicine questionnaires prepared by such a method are comparatively presented. It is shown that (a) inspite of a good deal of similarity between the two frames of reference considerable differences exist between the two sets of selected questions, and (b) the valid collection of medical information is limited to diagnostic categories that allow a clear description of medical symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical computing\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"211-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持医疗决策的计算机化信息系统是基于正式的医学知识。因此,合适的知识工程方法显得尤为重要。为了实现病史专家系统,提出了一种面向目标的知识工程构建方法。从诊断类别的框架开始,制定了一套可靠和有效的最佳问题。本文比较介绍了采用该方法编制的两份自主开发的普通医学问卷。结果表明:(a)尽管两个参考框架之间有许多相似之处,但两组选定问题之间存在相当大的差异;(b)有效收集的医疗信息仅限于能够明确描述医疗症状的诊断类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge of engineering for a medical-history expert system.

Computerized information systems that support medical decision-making are based upon formalized medical knowledge. Therefore, appropriate methods of knowledge engineering are of conspicuous importance. In order to arrive at a medical-history expert system, a target-oriented construction method of knowledge engineering was devised. Beginning with a framework of diagnostic categories, an optimal set of reliable and valid questions were formulated. In this paper, two independently developed general medicine questionnaires prepared by such a method are comparatively presented. It is shown that (a) inspite of a good deal of similarity between the two frames of reference considerable differences exist between the two sets of selected questions, and (b) the valid collection of medical information is limited to diagnostic categories that allow a clear description of medical symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal electronic records for diabetic patients. Part II: Clinical aspects. Longitudinal electronic records for diabetic patients. Part I: Clinical aspects. Installation of a network and custom made software connecting different HIV/AIDS centres. Decision making system. Six years of epidemiological monitoring with the Austrian computer based medical record abstract system for anonymous HIV-1 counseling and testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1