拉隆德及其后:回顾"加拿大人健康的新视角"。

T Hancock
{"title":"拉隆德及其后:回顾\"加拿大人健康的新视角\"。","authors":"T Hancock","doi":"10.1093/heapro/1.1.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Lalonde Report was published in 1974, and was the first significant government report to suggest that health care services were not the most important determinant of health. After reviewing the evidence, the report suggested that there were four \"health fields\"--lifestyle, environment, health care organization, human biology--and that major improvements in health would result primarily from improvements in lifestyle, environment and our knowledge of human biology. Lalonde also indicated a broad understanding of the determinants of health in subsequent speeches. While the report was greeted sympathetically at the time, it did not have all that significant an impact in Canada. It was criticised on a number of grounds, in particular that it paid too much attention to lifestyle and too little attention to environment. Furthermore, because health is a provincial responsibility in Canada, while the report was a federal report, there was no mechanism readily available to implement the recommendations of the report. The report was nonetheless widely hailed outside Canada, and similar (and often better) reports were published in Britain, the USA, Sweden and elsewhere. The report remains a highly regarded contribution to the transformation in thinking about health that has occurred in the past decade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79940,"journal":{"name":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":"93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.1.93","citationCount":"115","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lalonde and beyond: looking back at \\\"A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians\\\".\",\"authors\":\"T Hancock\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/1.1.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Lalonde Report was published in 1974, and was the first significant government report to suggest that health care services were not the most important determinant of health. After reviewing the evidence, the report suggested that there were four \\\"health fields\\\"--lifestyle, environment, health care organization, human biology--and that major improvements in health would result primarily from improvements in lifestyle, environment and our knowledge of human biology. Lalonde also indicated a broad understanding of the determinants of health in subsequent speeches. While the report was greeted sympathetically at the time, it did not have all that significant an impact in Canada. It was criticised on a number of grounds, in particular that it paid too much attention to lifestyle and too little attention to environment. Furthermore, because health is a provincial responsibility in Canada, while the report was a federal report, there was no mechanism readily available to implement the recommendations of the report. The report was nonetheless widely hailed outside Canada, and similar (and often better) reports were published in Britain, the USA, Sweden and elsewhere. The report remains a highly regarded contribution to the transformation in thinking about health that has occurred in the past decade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"93-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/heapro/1.1.93\",\"citationCount\":\"115\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health promotion (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.1.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health promotion (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/1.1.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 115

摘要

《拉隆德报告》发表于1974年,是第一份表明卫生保健服务不是健康最重要决定因素的重要政府报告。在审查了证据之后,报告指出,有四个"健康领域"————生活方式、环境、保健组织、人类生物学————而健康的重大改善主要来自生活方式、环境和我们对人类生物学知识的改善。拉隆德在随后的讲话中还表示对健康的决定因素有广泛的了解。虽然这份报告在当时受到了同情的欢迎,但它在加拿大并没有产生那么大的影响。它受到了很多批评,尤其是它太关注生活方式,而对环境的关注太少。此外,由于卫生是加拿大各省的责任,而该报告是一份联邦报告,因此没有现成的机制来执行报告的建议。尽管如此,这份报告还是在加拿大以外的地方广受欢迎,英国、美国、瑞典和其他地方也发表了类似(通常更好)的报告。该报告仍然是对过去十年中对卫生的看法发生转变的一项高度重视的贡献。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lalonde and beyond: looking back at "A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians".

The Lalonde Report was published in 1974, and was the first significant government report to suggest that health care services were not the most important determinant of health. After reviewing the evidence, the report suggested that there were four "health fields"--lifestyle, environment, health care organization, human biology--and that major improvements in health would result primarily from improvements in lifestyle, environment and our knowledge of human biology. Lalonde also indicated a broad understanding of the determinants of health in subsequent speeches. While the report was greeted sympathetically at the time, it did not have all that significant an impact in Canada. It was criticised on a number of grounds, in particular that it paid too much attention to lifestyle and too little attention to environment. Furthermore, because health is a provincial responsibility in Canada, while the report was a federal report, there was no mechanism readily available to implement the recommendations of the report. The report was nonetheless widely hailed outside Canada, and similar (and often better) reports were published in Britain, the USA, Sweden and elsewhere. The report remains a highly regarded contribution to the transformation in thinking about health that has occurred in the past decade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some social and health policy requirements for the prevention of AIDS. Health promotion policy in Sweden: means and methods in intersectoral action. The Arjeplog project: comprehensive health promotion in a community. Crossing the health divide--mortality attributable to social inequality in Great Britain. Dutch obstetric care: home or hospital, midwife or gynaecologist?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1