R M Nathu, W M Mendenhall, J T Parsons, A A Mancuso, R R Carroll
{"title":"T4口咽癌的诱导化疗和放疗。","authors":"R M Nathu, W M Mendenhall, J T Parsons, A A Mancuso, R R Carroll","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 1964 and 1996, 123 patients were treated for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma; 93 were treated with radiation therapy alone; 30 were treated with induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients who received induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy were treated between 1985 and 1996; during this time 39 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone. Five-year local control rates for patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, radiation therapy alone (all patients), and radiation therapy alone (patients treated since September 1985) were 63%, 38%, and 48%, respectively. The five-year rates of freedom from distant metastasis were 87%, 73%, and 76%, respectively. The five-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates were 58%, 27%, and 37%, respectively, while the five-year absolute survival rates were 42%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. Improvements in local control and freedom from distant metastasis in those receiving chemotherapy were not statistically significant, while the improvements in cause-specific survival and absolute survival were significant at the P < or = 0.05 level. Induction chemotherapy may improve the cure rate for patients with T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma. Although encouraging, these data are nonrandomized and should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20894,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology investigations","volume":"7 2","pages":"98-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"R M Nathu, W M Mendenhall, J T Parsons, A A Mancuso, R R Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between 1964 and 1996, 123 patients were treated for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma; 93 were treated with radiation therapy alone; 30 were treated with induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients who received induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy were treated between 1985 and 1996; during this time 39 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone. Five-year local control rates for patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, radiation therapy alone (all patients), and radiation therapy alone (patients treated since September 1985) were 63%, 38%, and 48%, respectively. The five-year rates of freedom from distant metastasis were 87%, 73%, and 76%, respectively. The five-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates were 58%, 27%, and 37%, respectively, while the five-year absolute survival rates were 42%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. Improvements in local control and freedom from distant metastasis in those receiving chemotherapy were not statistically significant, while the improvements in cause-specific survival and absolute survival were significant at the P < or = 0.05 level. Induction chemotherapy may improve the cure rate for patients with T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma. Although encouraging, these data are nonrandomized and should be interpreted with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"98-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation oncology investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1999)7:2<98::aid-roi5>3.0.co;2-b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma.
Between 1964 and 1996, 123 patients were treated for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma; 93 were treated with radiation therapy alone; 30 were treated with induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients who received induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy were treated between 1985 and 1996; during this time 39 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone. Five-year local control rates for patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, radiation therapy alone (all patients), and radiation therapy alone (patients treated since September 1985) were 63%, 38%, and 48%, respectively. The five-year rates of freedom from distant metastasis were 87%, 73%, and 76%, respectively. The five-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates were 58%, 27%, and 37%, respectively, while the five-year absolute survival rates were 42%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. Improvements in local control and freedom from distant metastasis in those receiving chemotherapy were not statistically significant, while the improvements in cause-specific survival and absolute survival were significant at the P < or = 0.05 level. Induction chemotherapy may improve the cure rate for patients with T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma. Although encouraging, these data are nonrandomized and should be interpreted with caution.