降息,缺乏政府行动扼杀了只有医疗补助的PSO。

{"title":"降息,缺乏政府行动扼杀了只有医疗补助的PSO。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providers learn from a Medicaid plan that didn't survive. When the University of Chicago started its Family First Medicaid plan, that health system thought it could retain its Medicaid patients by offering members a good benefit package with top-notch customer service, and even attract more patients when the state went to mandatory managed care enrollment. But two years later, the provider-sponsored plan is gone. Find out what went wrong.</p>","PeriodicalId":80144,"journal":{"name":"Public sector contracting report : the monthly guide to Medicare and Medicaid managed care","volume":"4 12","pages":"189-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate cuts, lack of state action kill Medicaid-only PSO.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Providers learn from a Medicaid plan that didn't survive. When the University of Chicago started its Family First Medicaid plan, that health system thought it could retain its Medicaid patients by offering members a good benefit package with top-notch customer service, and even attract more patients when the state went to mandatory managed care enrollment. But two years later, the provider-sponsored plan is gone. Find out what went wrong.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public sector contracting report : the monthly guide to Medicare and Medicaid managed care\",\"volume\":\"4 12\",\"pages\":\"189-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public sector contracting report : the monthly guide to Medicare and Medicaid managed care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public sector contracting report : the monthly guide to Medicare and Medicaid managed care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗服务提供者从失败的医疗补助计划中吸取教训。当芝加哥大学(University of Chicago)启动“家庭第一医疗补助计划”(Family First Medicaid)时,该医疗系统认为,通过向成员提供良好的福利待遇和一流的客户服务,它可以留住医疗补助计划的患者,甚至在国家实行强制性管理医疗注册时,它还能吸引更多的患者。但是两年后,这个由保险公司赞助的计划就消失了。找出哪里出了问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rate cuts, lack of state action kill Medicaid-only PSO.

Providers learn from a Medicaid plan that didn't survive. When the University of Chicago started its Family First Medicaid plan, that health system thought it could retain its Medicaid patients by offering members a good benefit package with top-notch customer service, and even attract more patients when the state went to mandatory managed care enrollment. But two years later, the provider-sponsored plan is gone. Find out what went wrong.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reach out to community to develop culturally sensitive patient care. CA study finds some challenges in Medicaid may be universal. Troubled PHO reveals Medicare risk contracting strategy. Model for PCP contracts offers right incentives for Medicare, Medicaid providers. Collect data, monitor claims receipts to ensure prompt Medicare, Medicaid payment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1