{"title":"九十年代的成长型产业。","authors":"Amacher","doi":"10.1007/s003290050122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article critically reviews the current state of knowledge relating to outcome following decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Non-biased reviews of outcome are rare, follow-up times are not uniform and generally short, surgical techniques are not standardized. Rationale regarding the efficacy of concomitant spinal fusion is unconvincing. A procedure that is becoming ever more common in the neurosurgical armamentarium appears to be poorly described with respect to outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79482,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","volume":"9 3","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s003290050122","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The growth industry of the nineties.\",\"authors\":\"Amacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s003290050122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article critically reviews the current state of knowledge relating to outcome following decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Non-biased reviews of outcome are rare, follow-up times are not uniform and generally short, surgical techniques are not standardized. Rationale regarding the efficacy of concomitant spinal fusion is unconvincing. A procedure that is becoming ever more common in the neurosurgical armamentarium appears to be poorly described with respect to outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"135-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s003290050122\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s003290050122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article critically reviews the current state of knowledge relating to outcome following decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Non-biased reviews of outcome are rare, follow-up times are not uniform and generally short, surgical techniques are not standardized. Rationale regarding the efficacy of concomitant spinal fusion is unconvincing. A procedure that is becoming ever more common in the neurosurgical armamentarium appears to be poorly described with respect to outcomes.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
